Gregg Jarrett: Donald Trump Jr. did not violate campaign laws -- Pelosi and others ar

[stjames1_53]

Gregg Jarrett: Donald Trump Jr. did not violate campaign laws -- Pelosi and others are wrong

The law is common sense. Yet, it is created by lawmakers who seem to be lacking any sense at all. Many of them do not understand their own laws.
Nancy Pelosi recently proved this point. The House Minority Leader held a news conference, surrounded by like-minded Democrats, during which she declared that Donald Trump Jr. had broken campaign laws when he met with a Russian lawyer during last year’s presidential campaign to obtain negative information on the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton. Here is what Pelosi said:
“This is a campaign violation: soliciting, coordinating, or accepting something of value --opposition research, documents, and information—from a foreign national. Plain and simple.”
In truth, it is plain and simple that Pelosi is wrong. And so are many others who have joined the chorus of condemnation based on laws they have surely never read. Allow me to help them out.

The Commission goes on to explain that foreigners are “allowed to attend campaign strategy meetings and events”. They are allowed to contribute ideas, information, and even advice. They are allowed to open their mouths and speak.
None of this is considered to be a donation or “anything of value” under the campaign statutes, as some Democrats and many in the media allege. To the contrary, the Commission specifically states, “an individual may volunteer his or her personal services to a campaign without making a campaign contribution”.
The same language is found in both the Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101 8-B) and the Code of Federal Regulations (100.74):
“The value of services provided by any individual who volunteers on behalf of a candidate or political committee is not a contribution.”


The Federal Election Commission is the independent regulatory agency which enforces campaign laws enacted by Congress. On its government website, the FEC makes it clear that it is perfectly lawful for foreign nationals to be involved in American political campaigns:
“Even though a foreign national cannot make campaign contributions, he or she can serve as an uncompensated volunteer for a campaign or political party”.
The First Amendment gives Americans the freedom to associate with whomever they want, including Russians. It gives people the freedom to exchange ideas and information, even with Russians. As long as the information is neither stolen nor classified, there is no crime. There is no civil wrong.
We do not criminalize free speech and free association in America. Yet, there is this false mentality that all Russians are boogeymen. And talking to them is somehow a crime. It is not. The founders of our Constitution would be mortified at that notion.
One commentator recently said, “Donald Trump Jr. had an absolute duty to notify the FBI”. Why? Where is that law or duty written? If it is not a crime to exchange information with a Russian, why should the FBI be notified? Why would FBI agents be interested in legal activity? Trust me, they are not. Even if a citizen learns of a crime, there is no affirmative duty imposed by law to report it to law enforcement.
Talking with a Russian and gathering information is not a crime. Yet Pelosi and others allege that the president’s son may also be guilty of conspiracies to commit espionage and defraud the government.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/...wrong.amp.html

no laws were broken, There can be no treason since we are not at war with Russia, much to the dislike of our resident lie-berals

[Agent Cooper]

I've always thought Democrats weren't the brightest bulbs, but they've dumbed themselves down to just plain stupid.

Term limits was never more necessary.

Maxine Waters, for Christ's sake. She's a name nobody should even know. She should be shuffled to the back of the asylum and forgotten.

[Crepitus]

Trumplings will defend Trumps to the bitter end.

[resister]

Trumplings will defend Trumps to the bitter end.

So you cant refute the OP? Got it ;-)

[resister]

I've always thought Democrats weren't the brightest bulbs, but they've dumbed themselves down to just plain stupid.

Term limits was never more necessary.

Maxine Waters, for Christ's sake. She's a name nobody should even know. She should be shuffled to the back of the asylum and forgotten.

Attachment 18899

[stjames1_53]

Trumplings will defend Trumps to the bitter end.

what laws did he break? What act of treason did he commit?
That alone needs no defending.....................

[MisterVeritis]

Trumplings will defend Trumps to the bitter end.

...which will come in about 7.5 years.

[stjames1_53]

notice, with one exception, the lie-berals are avoiding this thread like the plague

[texan]

I've always thought Democrats weren't the brightest bulbs, but they've dumbed themselves down to just plain stupid.

Term limits was never more necessary.

Maxine Waters, for Christ's sake. She's a name nobody should even know. She should be shuffled to the back of the asylum and forgotten.

I laughed at the note she would run for president as it has been floated lately. LOL! Please.......She is more disliked than HRC and doesn't know it. At least Billary knew it.

[Captain Obvious]

Trumplings will defend Trumps to the bitter end.

Defend?

Against what, a baseless witch hunt from the bedwetting crowd?

There is nothing being defended.