User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: What the 2012 U.S. Election Implies

Threaded View

  1. #14
    Original Ranter
    Points: 298,326, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    416629
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    118,065
    Points
    298,326
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    25,344
    Thanked 53,574x in 36,513 Posts
    Mentioned
    1102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by IMPress Polly View Post
    By "won the popular vote", I refer to acquiring a plurality of it. I think you knew that.
    That certainly carries far different implications from what you were attempting to argue. Again, it's highly likely that Clinton would have lost in 1992 if Perot had not run. Possibly in 1996 as well. You analysis needs work.

    I give you evidence including a link and you call me delusional without substantiation. Yeah I believe that about sums up the level of dialogue here.
    An editorial is not evidence. Try again. Secondly, I am calling all women who felt that their right to an abortion was being threatened delusional. If that's the case then they were easily swayed by propaganda and fear mongering. That says less about the GOP than it does the political acumen of female voters.
    Last edited by Mister D; 11-11-2012 at 12:36 PM.
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts