User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: You need to know what you’re talking about

  1. #1
    Points: 500,453, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cigar's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    325517
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wow, what next?
    Posts
    78,900
    Points
    500,453
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,088
    Thanked 12,276x in 9,780 Posts
    Mentioned
    1541 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Exclamation You need to know what you’re talking about

    Rachel Maddow smacked down the defacto foreign policy leader of the Republican Party, Republican Senator John McCain, for being both wrong and incompetent on foreign policy...

    Noting that the Republican Party still hasn’t admitted they got Iraq wrong, and that they ran Mitt Romney who has zero foreign policy experience, Rachel Maddow sees Republicans as allowing McCain to be their voice for foreign policy. This is a problem for the country since he is so often completely wrong on the subject.

    After playing a Chris Hayes montage of McCain getting it wrong repeatedly entitled “Arm the Rebels”, Maddow delivered the final blow:

    .“There is a basic level of interest and competence required even of the opposition party on the subject, even if the country has decided they don’t want to put you back in the White House, not after what George W Bush did with it. Even if you’re just in congress, even if you’re just the opposition, you need to know what you’re talking about. You need to have a basic level of competence. And doing what John McCain says is not a reasonable substitution for basic competence on this subject.”

    Read more: http://www.politicususa.com/rachel-m...ing-about.html


    So I wonder why we are starting this new Congress with a protracted debate about a foregone conclusion… . I can only conclude we are doing this for no other reason than lingering bitterness at the outcome of the elections… . We all have varying policy views, but the President, in my view, has a clear right to put in place the team he believed would serve him best.


    Of course, in the case of the above quote, the year was 2005, the "Rice" was Condoleezza, the incorrect assertions were that Saddam Hussein's regime had weapons of mass destruction, and the defender ... was John McCain.

    Ooops ...

  2. #2
    Points: 14,949, Level: 29
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 501
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    keymanjim's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    4661
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,253
    Points
    14,949
    Level
    29
    Thanks Given
    1,093
    Thanked 1,205x in 824 Posts
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So, what she basically said, in her slacked-jawed progressive unearned smugness, was "McCain am wrong".

  3. #3
    Points: 500,453, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cigar's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    325517
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wow, what next?
    Posts
    78,900
    Points
    500,453
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,088
    Thanked 12,276x in 9,780 Posts
    Mentioned
    1541 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by keymanjim View Post
    So, what she basically said, in her slacked-jawed progressive unearned smugness, was "McCain am wrong".
    So I wonder why we are starting this new Congress with a protracted debate about a foregone conclusion… . I can only conclude we are doing this for no other reason than lingering bitterness at the outcome of the elections… . We all have varying policy views, but the President, in my view, has a clear right to put in place the team he believed would serve him best.

    ~ Sen McCain

  4. #4
    Points: 113,551, Level: 81
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 99
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hanger4's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    221697
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mountains of WNC
    Posts
    43,300
    Points
    113,551
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    12,975
    Thanked 22,806x in 15,377 Posts
    Mentioned
    549 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    From your link Cigar;

    Maddow said

    "Never mind that Rice was only repeating what the intelligence community approved as talking points on the Benghazi attacks, McCain wants her to go on TV and say she was “wrong.”"
    Maddow lied to make her point.

    Petraeus and others have already testified the WH knew with in a day or so the attack was not a "video made um do it" scenario.

    Five days later Rice was sent out to lie.

    Maddow basses her opinion on a known false premise, She knows she lied.

    She must believe her viewers are imbeciles to so blatantly lie and call it the truth.
    It's ok if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to hanger4 For This Useful Post:

    keymanjim (11-20-2012)

  6. #5
    Points: 500,453, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cigar's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    325517
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wow, what next?
    Posts
    78,900
    Points
    500,453
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,088
    Thanked 12,276x in 9,780 Posts
    Mentioned
    1541 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hanger4 View Post
    From your link Cigar;

    Maddow said



    Maddow lied to make her point.

    Petraeus and others have already testified the WH knew with in a day or so the attack was not a "video made um do it" scenario.

    Five days later Rice was sent out to lie.

    Maddow basses her opinion on a known false premise, She knows she lied.

    She must believe her viewers are imbeciles to so blatantly lie and call it the truth.


    Care to explain Powell and Rice Lies of the Bush Administration?

  7. #6
    Points: 113,551, Level: 81
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 99
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hanger4's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    221697
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mountains of WNC
    Posts
    43,300
    Points
    113,551
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    12,975
    Thanked 22,806x in 15,377 Posts
    Mentioned
    549 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cigar View Post
    Care to explain Powell and Rice Lies of the Bush Administration?
    Did they lie or was it bad intelligence ??

    http://intelligence.senate.gov/080605/phase2a.pdf

    We know someone told Rice to lie.
    It's ok if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.

  8. #7
    Points: 113,551, Level: 81
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 99
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hanger4's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    221697
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mountains of WNC
    Posts
    43,300
    Points
    113,551
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    12,975
    Thanked 22,806x in 15,377 Posts
    Mentioned
    549 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As an aside Cigar,

    to point at others and claim "they did it too" to justify your point

    does nothing but solidify the point of your opponent.
    It's ok if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.

  9. #8
    Points: 500,453, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cigar's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    325517
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wow, what next?
    Posts
    78,900
    Points
    500,453
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,088
    Thanked 12,276x in 9,780 Posts
    Mentioned
    1541 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hanger4 View Post
    As an aside Cigar,

    to point at others and claim "they did it too" to justify your point

    does nothing but solidify the point of your opponent.

    Now that really sounds hilarious coming from the Right

  10. #9
    Points: 113,551, Level: 81
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 99
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hanger4's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    221697
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mountains of WNC
    Posts
    43,300
    Points
    113,551
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    12,975
    Thanked 22,806x in 15,377 Posts
    Mentioned
    549 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cigar View Post
    Now that really sounds hilarious coming from the Right
    It came from me Cigar, your generalizations and continued "they did it too" memes are juvenile at best.
    It's ok if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.

  11. #10
    Points: 14,949, Level: 29
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 501
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    keymanjim's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    4661
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,253
    Points
    14,949
    Level
    29
    Thanks Given
    1,093
    Thanked 1,205x in 824 Posts
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cigar View Post
    Care to explain Powell and Rice Lies of the Bush Administration?
    Wow! Trolling your own thread. How low can you get?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts