Mark Levin goes nuclear on Marxist caller

[Cruel]

So let us debate something of substance, ok?

Enough with the name calling. I am sorry and ask you to accept my apology.

sub·stance
   [suhb-stuhns]
noun
1.
that of which a thing consists; physical matter or material: form and substance.
2.
a species of matter of definite chemical composition: a chalky substance.
3.
controlled substance.
4.
the subject matter of thought, discourse, study, etc.
5.
the actual matter of a thing, as opposed to the appearance or shadow; reality.

In the way you most likely meant (substance) which would match the 4th an 5th definitions of it, I have been responding to your posted thoughts and subject matter posts.

We can give the no name calling a try and I can cut you some slack this time for your apology, but don't expect me not to take you to task for your statements and posted threads such as the slandering of the Tea Party and Cain one you posted today in the future. I will call things as I see them, cruelly or not.

[jgreer]

I think we can talk about things without the name calling. I am glad you can agree. You can call Obama names and I can call Cain names but at the end of the day I don't have any anger toward you. You can be cruel to me and I won't care.

[Mr. Wonderful]

So let us debate something of substance, ok?

Enough with the name calling. I am sorry and ask you to accept my apology.

sub·stance
   [suhb-stuhns]
noun
1.
that of which a thing consists; physical matter or material: form and substance.
2.
a species of matter of definite chemical composition: a chalky substance.
3.
controlled substance.
4.
the subject matter of thought, discourse, study, etc.
5.
the actual matter of a thing, as opposed to the appearance or shadow; reality.

In the way you most likely meant (substance) which would match the 4th an 5th definitions of it, I have been responding to your posted thoughts and subject matter posts.

We can give the no name calling a try and I can cut you some slack this time for your apology, but don't expect me not to take you to task for your statements and posted threads such as the slandering of the Tea Party and Cain one you posted today in the future. I will call things as I see them, cruelly or not.

Nothing wrong with calling out a Liberal. If we had done it more they wouldn't have made things as bad as they are now. Call the bull when you see it, that what every patriot should do.

[MMC]

Again Bush was the one to initiate all Clandestine activites into motion against AQ. Moreover he forced the French to have to open up their Interpol which they had not done. Were not doing. Forcing the French to share Intel and what their L.E.s had on anybody. Nobody can take that away from Bush.

Althought I do not think we needed a DHS created. Which was not only an expansion of Government. But the passing of Power to a Fed Dept that Supercedes all others. In which the only line they ever have to use is.....It's in the Interests of National Security. Classified, and thats to others like NSA and All our L.E.s

so you are sayin the french had better intel that we did?

that is terrible

and dhs plus more alphabet divisions just make things more complicated

we already had fbi nsa cia and on and on. they need to be able to share info not compete for it

No I am saying they didnt share info. Now would they. Until Bush gave Sarkosy an offer he couldnt refuse. Which is the way the French and the Sunni always need to be treated. The Brits I would say have the best intel in the EU. Both Bush and Blair railed at the French. Moreover the French did not back its Allies with Iraq and only sent limited, very limted troops to Afghanistan. Which they were pulling out their 300 guys.

Course then the French dont have to pay for no Defense as they are protected by the US and NATO.