User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Lawmakers Open to Change in Military Benefits......

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Lawmakers Open to Change in Military Benefits......

    http://news.yahoo.com/lawmakers-open...080216962.html

    Republicans and Democrats alike are signaling a willingness — unheard of at the height of two post-Sept. 11 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — to make military retirees pay more for coverage. It's a reflection of Washington's newfound embrace of fiscal austerity and the Pentagon's push to cut health care costs that have skyrocketed from $19 billion in 2001 to $53 billion.

    The numbers are daunting for a military focused on building and arming an all-volunteer force for war. The Pentagon is providing health care coverage for 3.3 million active duty personnel and their dependents and 5.5 million retirees, eligible dependents and surviving spouses. Retirees outnumber the active duty, 2.3 million to 1.4 million.

    The two groups were unnerved when both parties' leaders on the Senate Armed Services Committee — Carl Levin, D-Mich., and John McCain, R-Ariz. — recommended that the special deficit-cutting supercommittee look at raising enrollment fees and imposing restrictions on the military's health care program, known as TRICARE. Current military members would be grandfathered in.
    McCain and Levin also favored creating a commission to look at military retirement benefits and make recommendations for changes Republicans and Democrats have echoed his apocalyptic warning. In their separate letters to the supercommittee, Levin and McCain said they reject any deeper cuts in overall defense spending beyond the 10-year, $450 billion cuts.

    Determined to avoid spending reductions that would hit troop numbers, aircraft, ships and weapons, Levin, McCain and other lawmakers are urging budget-cutters to scrutinize the military entitlement programs.

    Levin and McCain support establishing an annual enrollment fee for TRICARE for Life, the health care program that now has no fee for participation. Obama had proposed an initial annual fee of $200.

    Levin said future increases in fees should be tied to the same index used to determine hikes in the TRICARE Prime program, which has the lowest out-of-pocked expenses.

    McCain also urged the supercommittee to consider restricting working-age military retirees and their dependents from enrolling in TRICARE Prime. The retirees could still enroll in other TRICARE programs. McCain pointed out that the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that such a move would save $111 billion over 10 years.

    The House vote to raise the annual TRICARE Prime fees by $2.50 for individuals and $5 for families.....snip~

    Now because they are deperate for money they want to go after Vets and the Military benefits. Thats both Parties. Yet did they go after those lifelong Judges Positions. Those politicans benefits. What are they doing for the Dept of the SOS. Not to mention those Serving only get combat pay while in a War. So it's not like they would even have the income to live on by themselves.

    Both Panetta and Clinton have stated that the Military cannot be cut more than the 450 billion already stated without it affecting the National Security of the US. Helloooo, catch the terminology that was told to Congress and the White House. A Threat to the National Security of the US. Which means any percieved talks will then become classified and certian programs will not be cut.

    Note.....WITF is Johnny (Quest) McCain doing on the is Armed Services Committee as Head of that Committee. Number one lets not forget McCain says he don't know anything about economics. Basics right? So here is a guy proposing to cut and or hinder, not to mention cost Military personell and their families to have to pay more and spend more. Yet then runs out and talks about how he is for the troops.

    To top it off every week Johnny toots his horn only to change what he stated from before. No telling which way Johnny Quest's horn will blow. Then the State of Arizona re-elects him all based on the fact that he is a War Hero. That the military generations of today actually listen to what he has to say is bad enough. But then to watch him flip over things he did or started or even said is a trajedy in itself.


    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  2. #2
    Original Ranter
    Points: 10,045, Level: 23
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 5
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Elibe's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    42
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    274
    Points
    10,045
    Level
    23
    Thanks Given
    8
    Thanked 23x in 16 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Lawmakers Open to Change in Military Benefits......

    good the military should be the first thing cut

    we dont need to keep this up

  3. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Lawmakers Open to Change in Military Benefits......

    Quote Originally Posted by Elibe View Post
    good the military should be the first thing cut

    we dont need to keep this up
    They have already cut 450 billion.....going after benefits for medical, knowing most Vets will need medical care is ridiculous. Moreover there is already a difference for those who never serve in War-time as opposed to those who do.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  4. #4
    Original Ranter
    Points: 10,045, Level: 23
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 5
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Elibe's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    42
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    274
    Points
    10,045
    Level
    23
    Thanks Given
    8
    Thanked 23x in 16 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Lawmakers Open to Change in Military Benefits......

    see the conservatives want it both ways

    no government health care for all americans but vets get all their medical care for free for life? that is not right

    i think everyone in this country has the right for healthcare not just military

  5. #5
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Lawmakers Open to Change in Military Benefits......

    Quote Originally Posted by Elibe View Post
    see the conservatives want it both ways

    no government health care for all americans but vets get all their medical care for free for life? that is not right

    i think everyone in this country has the right for healthcare not just military
    Yep I dont have a problem with those going off to War. Sacrificing All if necessay. How you can apply it to politicians and judges that get lifelong jobs and benefits sure don't make no sense to me.

    Moreover a people without the means to protect themselves. Won't stand long as a country. Since we have to have an Army. Do you want that Army to be the best there is. Or just average. Looking to cut all from Defense is not the answer. Again thats 450 billion plus what Gates cut before he left.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Obama Allows the Taliban to Open New Office in Qatar
    By Juggernaut in forum U.S. Politics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-08-2017, 09:00 PM
  2. Senate Approves Job Benefits for Veterans.....
    By MMC in forum U.S. Politics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-11-2011, 10:47 AM
  3. Should the Age to Receive Social Security Benefits be Raised?
    By Conley in forum The Latest Happenings
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-19-2011, 09:36 PM
  4. Have CA lawmakers gone insane?
    By Mister D in forum Rants
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-08-2011, 05:51 AM
  5. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-24-2011, 04:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts