User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47

Thread: There’s talk of capping 401(k) contributions at $2,400 per year

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    There’s talk of capping 401(k) contributions at $2,400 per year

    There’s talk of capping 401(k) contributions at $2,400 per year

    This is not a good idea. I wonder who is floating it?

    Proposals floating around Washington to cap the amount that Americans can contribute before taxes to 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts are unsettling professionals in the retirement industry.

    Republicans are looking for ways to generate revenue to support broad reductions in individual tax rates. One idea is to limit the amount of pretax money households can sock away for retirement saving. Such a move would likely generate significant political blowback but it hasn’t been explicitly ruled out, stirring worry among industry lobbyists.

    Experts say most Americans are under-prepared for retirement. This plan would make that worse.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. #2
    Points: 10,517, Level: 24
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 333
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Kacper's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1027
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,404
    Points
    10,517
    Level
    24
    Thanks Given
    495
    Thanked 1,017x in 747 Posts
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Doubt it happens for other reasons. There is almost $5T in the market in 401K's. The indices would tank if that money stopped flowing into the markets. In addition, people like me would be royally PO'd if my retirement planning got gutted so the top 1% got a tax cut.

  3. #3
    Points: 445,632, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    339120
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    66,766
    Points
    445,632
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    8,788
    Thanked 18,323x in 10,925 Posts
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The house floated it and I just dont understand it. Americans do not save enough as it is and they certainly dont save enough for retirement. Somehow they think its a good idea to cap how much they can save for retirement. What the hell could be the purpose for that.
    LETS GO BRANDON
    F Joe Biden

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Common For This Useful Post:

    Captain Obvious (10-21-2017),NapRover (10-21-2017),Peter1469 (10-21-2017)

  5. #4
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    During the 2008 elections the left floated the idea of taking all 401Ks and trading the dollars for T-Bills- making them backed by bonds. At the time I said that would end the country. Investors would rebel.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:


  7. #5

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 479,587, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 72.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    201361
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    53,455
    Points
    479,587
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,193
    Thanked 46,631x in 25,168 Posts
    Mentioned
    892 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't get the suggestion. Why? To tax more income? There's already an annual limit for HCIs. This would hurt the people that need it the most.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    Kacper (10-21-2017)

  9. #6
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    I don't get the suggestion. Why? To tax more income? There's already an annual limit for HCIs. This would hurt the people that need it the most.
    Right, to tax another $3100 per year from all who max out their 401Ks.

    And yes, that just hurts people who save for their retirements.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Points: 445,632, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    339120
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    66,766
    Points
    445,632
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    8,788
    Thanked 18,323x in 10,925 Posts
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    I don't get the suggestion. Why? To tax more income? There's already an annual limit for HCIs. This would hurt the people that need it the most.
    Exactly, just like with bush tax cuts that they touted as an across the board tax cut for everyone, that was just not true
    LETS GO BRANDON
    F Joe Biden

  12. #8
    Points: 10,517, Level: 24
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 333
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Kacper's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1027
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,404
    Points
    10,517
    Level
    24
    Thanks Given
    495
    Thanked 1,017x in 747 Posts
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    The house floated it and I just dont understand it. Americans do not save enough as it is and they certainly dont save enough for retirement. Somehow they think its a good idea to cap how much they can save for retirement. What the hell could be the purpose for that.
    My guess is that they assume that those who don't save by 401K will invest directly in the market which will push more volume/trading into the day to day exchanges.

  13. #9

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 479,587, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 72.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    201361
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    53,455
    Points
    479,587
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,193
    Thanked 46,631x in 25,168 Posts
    Mentioned
    892 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kacper View Post
    My guess is that they assume that those who don't save by 401K will invest directly in the market which will push more volume/trading into the day to day exchanges.
    They have to know that's not true. If you let people take it home, they spend it generally. The 401K is a good method of tax reduction and forced savings.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (10-21-2017)

  15. #10
    Points: 173,687, Level: 99
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 3,963
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88678
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52,092
    Points
    173,687
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    18,455
    Thanked 20,646x in 14,858 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    There’s talk of capping 401(k) contributions at $2,400 per year

    This is not a good idea. I wonder who is floating it?



    Experts say most Americans are under-prepared for retirement. This plan would make that worse.

    No doubt proposed by someone who makes millions in unearned income and only pays 20% on most of those millions.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts