What did Obama have to do with that?Originally Posted by leekohler2
Senior Member
What did Obama have to do with that?
stjames1_53 (11-13-2017)
Senior Member
bullsh!t!!.....................you want it all your way and you'll have that over my dead body
For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
- Thucydides
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Senior Member
"Activist Judges". Haven't you heard?
In contrast, Trump is actually nominating people who he thinks will will be biased in their decisions, not people who he thinks will actually adhere to the constitution. Why anyone thinks that's a good idea is beyond me.
Last edited by leekohler2; 11-13-2017 at 11:30 AM.
I'm prancing like a pony.
Senior Member
Well then, Obama gets credit for nominating people who he thought would be biased in their decisions, not for legalizing gay marriage. Had he been a leader and pushed through legislation, or even tried to do so, then he would be deserving of the credit."Activist Judges". Haven't you heard?
In contrast, Trump is actually nominating people who he thinks will will be biased in their decisions, not people who he thinks will actually adhere to the constitution. Why anyone thinks that's a good idea is beyond me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kalkin (11-13-2017)
Senior Member
Biased toward the constitution. Why anyone on the left thinks that is a good idea is beyond me."Activist Judges". Haven't you heard?
In contrast, Trump is actually nominating people who he thinks will will be biased in their decisions, not people who he thinks will actually adhere to the constitution. Why anyone thinks that's a good idea is beyond me.
Senior Member
Good god, not you too.
I'm prancing like a pony.
Overlord
Your question is irrelevant to the topic. It’s a deflection.
"Those who produce should have, but we know that those who produce the most — that is, those who work hardest, and at the most difficult and most menial tasks, have the least."
- Eugene V. Debs (1855-1926), five-time Socialist Party candidate for U.S. President
silvereyes (11-13-2017)
Senior Member
I just turned your logic around on you. For what it's worth, I had hoped he would at least try to legalize it the right way. I felt then and still do, that the best way is through hearts and minds, not judicial activism, but he let us down. Lucky for him, he had appointed judges who were biased to the left, and so he never had to take a stand either way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Green Arrow (11-13-2017)
Senior Member
Oh, Obama never nominated anyone who he thought would be biased in his favor, no siree, he never did anything like that......get real.
What do you want, Lee, that you don't already have? Name one thing. You have access to everything every other citizen has, heck, we're always hearing about how well you're doing, so, is what you want, special treatment for being a gay man?
Senior Member
so, you are actually defining activism as non-biased?....f*cking wow"Activist Judges". Haven't you heard?
In contrast, Trump is actually nominating people who he thinks will will be biased in their decisions, not people who he thinks will actually adhere to the constitution. Why anyone thinks that's a good idea is beyond me.
For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
- Thucydides
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
