User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Has Civilization Really Changed?

  1. #1
    Points: 222,626, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteranYour first Group
    Ethereal's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    468804
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    67,628
    Points
    222,626
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    14,219
    Thanked 41,536x in 26,005 Posts
    Mentioned
    1169 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Has Civilization Really Changed?

    I think it's fair to say that most people operate under the assumption that civilization, such as it is, has been undergoing a constant state of change and evolution, a process that many would characterize as "progress". But is that really the case? Is there any fundamental difference between how ancient Egypt or Rome operated and how ostensibly "enlightened" western nations operate? I would concede that the rhetoric and the dialectic have changed significantly, but has the actual substance of power dynamics reflected that change? I would contend that it has not. We still live in a world where a tiny elite control society through a combination of psychological conditioning and brute force. The packaging may be different, but the results are largely the same.
    Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
    --John Adams

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ethereal For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (11-13-2017),resister (11-13-2017)

  3. #2
    Points: 174,762, Level: 99
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 2,888
    Overall activity: 23.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    Dr. Who's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    870666
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Gallifrey
    Posts
    69,089
    Points
    174,762
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    12,826
    Thanked 12,929x in 8,807 Posts
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As you point out, we have not lost the pyramidal system that has characterized society since we moved out of caves. However, we certainly have developed an extensive body of law to protect ourselves from our worst inclinations. That's certainly not 100%. The more impoverished the nation, the less it appears that laws are enforced because enforcement requires the ability to employ enforcers. Have we changed significantly as people - not so much. We are better educated and less tolerant of abuses, but the tiny elite are still dominating the world. Why - because wealth still equals power. We still live in a world of scarcity (even if it's often artificial).
    In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.



    "The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
    Mahatma Gandhi

  4. #3
    Points: 78,723, Level: 68
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 1,327
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveSocial50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    resister's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    154141
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    29,399
    Points
    78,723
    Level
    68
    Thanks Given
    23,242
    Thanked 10,122x in 7,595 Posts
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    I think it's fair to say that most people operate under the assumption that civilization, such as it is, has been undergoing a constant state of change and evolution, a process that many would characterize as "progress". But is that really the case? Is there any fundamental difference between how ancient Egypt or Rome operated and how ostensibly "enlightened" western nations operate? I would concede that the rhetoric and the dialectic have changed significantly, but has the actual substance of power dynamics reflected that change? I would contend that it has not. We still live in a world where a tiny elite control society through a combination of psychological conditioning and brute force. The packaging may be different, but the results are largely the same.
    Interesting, I think you have a great point!
    There is no God but Resister and Refugee is his messenger’.

    Book of Democrat Things, Chapter 1:1






  5. #4
    Points: 665,213, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433306
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,542
    Points
    665,213
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,895x in 54,713 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Civilization, not much. They rise and fall while people persist.

    Within the last 1-2% of man's existence civilization has brought us the state and then the nation-state, an oxymoron in that nations are defined by race/ethnicity, language, traditions, customs, history, place, etc, and the state by artificial boundaries and laws. I think the days of empire are over, states splintering up into, well, nations, the failure of the EU--but for the defacto hegemony of the US.

    The notion of the individual so prominent today in the modern view, was unthinkable in a part of family, tribe, even unto feudal times and what some describe as organic collectives, but Christianity seeded it till it emerged in the Enlightenment, and then the reaction against individualism in in what might be seen as a return to collectivism in Nazism, Fascism, Communism were it not artificial.

    Certainly man has progressed technologically.

    I don't think man has ever changed morally.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts