WH Warns 29 Sanctuary Cities to Comply to Get Aid

[Captdon]

Won’t happen. Every attempt by the dictator has been rebuked by the courts

SCOTUS allowed his ban. His rescinding regulations has been upheld. So far, SCOTUS hasn't ruled against him once.

[gamewell45]

It's about damn time! Cities that don't comply don't deserve anything from the federal government.....period. let them flounder and die, for all I care.

ANY, US city that puts illegals ahead of the legal citizens, as far as I'm concerned, are traitors to this country and, should be prosecuted.....the city officials, I know you can't prosecute a city.

I'm sick to death of illegals getting special treatment, at this point, I'd be in favor of a bounty put on them, that's how fed up I am and, how tired I am of having to support them.

Hypothetically what would you do if they cut off aid to all the cities that harbor illegals and the states/businesses in retaliation refused to collect federal withholding taxes and provide security for federal installations, etc.

I think the better way to resolve this is to use the court system and whatever the courts say everyone abides by it.

[Common]

SCOTUS allowed his ban. His rescinding regulations has been upheld. So far, SCOTUS hasn't ruled against him once.

They wont on sanctuary cities either because they are illegal

[Agent Zero]

They wont on sanctuary cities either because they are illegal

Yes you are.

https://www.google.com/search?q=cour...obile&ie=UTF-8

Lol.

[leekohler2]

Won’t happen. Every attempt by the dictator has been rebuked by the courts

It is the job of the fed to enforce immigration law. It is not the job of local governments. Period. Local police forces have their own jobs to do.

[leekohler2]

Lol.

Good lord. The ignorance is astounding.

[Newpublius]

It is the job of the fed to enforce immigration law. It is not the job of local governments. Period. Local police forces have their own jobs to do.

And its the job of states to police state laws, right? So if the feds pick up a person wanted on a felony warrant by a state government, should the feds ignore that?

Of course not. Its called 'concurrent jurisdiction'

Its how it should be done.

[Abby08]

There's no way the courts can side with something that isn't legal......and, if they do, then all hope is lost, there would be no reason to keep our court system.

[MisterVeritis]

We need to amend the Constitution to end the practice of counting illegal aliens for representation and federal dollars.

[leekohler2]

And its the job of states to police state laws, right? So if the feds pick up a person wanted on a felony warrant by a state government, should the feds ignore that?

Of course not. Its called 'concurrent jurisdiction'

Its how it should be done.

Read:

http://beta.latimes.com/opinion/op-e...306-story.html