User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 41011121314
Results 131 to 133 of 133

Thread: So, why do we need tax cuts now?

  1. #131
    Points: 50,281, Level: 54
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    Mini Me's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    20518
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Grass Valley, CA
    Posts
    16,815
    Points
    50,281
    Level
    54
    Thanks Given
    4,643
    Thanked 1,662x in 1,296 Posts
    Mentioned
    118 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Docthehun View Post
    I'm opposed to the tax cuts. The economy has been and is doing fine. Corporations are sitting on record amounts of dough and interest rates are incredibly low. If there was real demand for a corporation's goods and services beyond their current capacity, they would have borrowed the dough to build. It's expensive to build stuff here, especially if a business has to hire you or I. Worse, you and I aren't necessarily the employees we once were. In any case, if corporations need dough, let them borrow it.

    As far as tax cuts for you and I, let's get real. The last number I heard was $688 bucks a year for the average family making between 50 and 80 thousand a year. What are you planning to do with your extra $13.25 a week. Seriously! This is a glitzy attempt by my party to disguise a "cash for clunkers" program as huge, dramatic tax cut and reform. Please, people aren't stupid. Most of us don't pay much, if any Federal tax to start, so unless they're planning on giving us a freebee, the real tax break dough is going almost entirely to those who don't really need it in the first place. They wouldn't know "week to week" if it came up and bit them in the arse.

    Throw in the fact, that most of these new rules will expire anyway, I bet you'll see your taxes soar in five or six years. Unless of course you're a corporation, for which, the cuts are permanent. Sounds fair to me................

    But hey, it is what it is and you'd all hate my solutions anyway; so belly up to the bar and enjoy the "greatest tax cut" in history. We sent them to Washington, so I guess we're getting exactly what we demanded.
    Good post! Its timed so the next regime will get the tax increases. That means the Dems!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Mini Me For This Useful Post:

    Docthehun (11-22-2017)

  3. #132
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497546
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,556x in 94,977 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
    Good post! Its timed so the next regime will get the tax increases. That means the Dems!
    They won't win on a tax increase agenda. They will run anti-Trump, not mention a tax increase, and then cramp one through if they win.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  4. #133
    Points: 435,862, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308622
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    184,810
    Points
    435,862
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,287
    Thanked 77,637x in 56,021 Posts
    Mentioned
    707 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Docthehun View Post
    Come on now. How much? Social Security & Medicare/caid combined aren't 1.5T a year. Tens of trillions over the last several years? I think not! Sources for those numbers please.
    we have transferred tens of trillions of dollars to the needy and lazy through the supposed "war on poverty". How much more should we throw down the drain?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts