User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The Iran-vs.-Saudi Arabia proxy war isn’t worth getting our military involved.

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497526
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,536x in 94,963 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    The Iran-vs.-Saudi Arabia proxy war isn’t worth getting our military involved.

    The Iran-vs.-Saudi Arabia proxy war isn’t worth getting our military involved.

    An interesting article that shows some interesting links between al Qaeda and Iran and how Iran tried to give them to us. But we refused.

    On November 1, CIA Director Mike Pompeo released thousands of files found by SEAL Team Six in Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Many documents detailed ties between al-Qaeda and Iran. Ned Price, former CIA analyst and de facto Obama administration official, accused Pompeo of releasing the documents to torpedo the Iran deal and drum up support for regime change in Iran. In rushed The Weekly Standard’s Stephen Hayes to claim the documents show how the Obama administration—Ned Price included—covered up the Iran and al-Qaeda ties for political purposes.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    donttread (11-24-2017)

  3. #2
    Points: 141,908, Level: 90
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 1,142
    Overall activity: 28.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ransom's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    48090
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,318
    Points
    141,908
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    10,167
    Thanked 15,097x in 10,779 Posts
    Mentioned
    496 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Our military already involved.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...aida-us-troops

    The US military has for the first time publicly acknowledged that US troops are operating inside Yemen to help the country’s government and a Saudi-backed coalition confront al-Qaida affiliated forces.
    Defense department spokesman Navy captain Jeff Davis said on Friday that a “very small number” of military personnel has in recent weeks been working with Yemeni and Arab Coalition forces to push al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) fighters from the port city of Mukalla.

    The Pentagon has stepped up air strikes against the jihadists in the war-torn country, Davis said.
    “This is of great interest to us. It does not serve our interests to have a terrorist organization in charge of a port city, and so we are assisting in that,” the spokesman added.
    He said the troops were helping Emirati forces with “intelligence support”, but declined to say if they are special operations forces.
    Poverty is rife, thousands have died and children have joined the fighting – Yemen’s year of civil war has been a catastrophe While the number of US personnel on the ground is limited, the US is also offering an array of assistance to partners in Yemen, including air-to-air refueling capabilities, surveillance, planning, maritime security and medical help.


    The US Navy also has several ships nearby, including an amphibious assault ship called the USS Boxer and two destroyers.

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497526
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,536x in 94,963 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ransom View Post
    I am not too worried about SoF forces doing typical SoF stuff.

    I worry about using conventional forces in places like that.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  5. #4
    Points: 141,908, Level: 90
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 1,142
    Overall activity: 28.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ransom's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    48090
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,318
    Points
    141,908
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    10,167
    Thanked 15,097x in 10,779 Posts
    Mentioned
    496 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's good Peter. Because it means you see a reality that is nothing less than a vital national security interest. And why you do not oppose US intervention or need to directly confront ISIS and al-Qaeda. It means insurgencies or these organizations taking refuge in Yemen or anywhere on the Arabian Peninsula or even across the Gulf of Aden to include Somalia and Sudan you consider a threat. It is in our interests to prevent these organizations from creating training facilities or camps they can then threaten the population and governments from. Getting better Pete, you have tightened up. Great job.

  6. #5
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497526
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,536x in 94,963 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ransom View Post
    That's good Peter. Because it means you see a reality that is nothing less than a vital national security interest. And why you do not oppose US intervention or need to directly confront ISIS and al-Qaeda. It means insurgencies or these organizations taking refuge in Yemen or anywhere on the Arabian Peninsula or even across the Gulf of Aden to include Somalia and Sudan you consider a threat. It is in our interests to prevent these organizations from creating training facilities or camps they can then threaten the population and governments from. Getting better Pete, you have tightened up. Great job.
    I have posted before that we have SoF in over 18- countries. I support that.

    What I don't support is the Neocon occupation movements.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  7. #6
    Points: 173,663, Level: 99
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 3,987
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88673
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52,085
    Points
    173,663
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    18,449
    Thanked 20,641x in 14,855 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hopefully we can start practicing STFOOI. Or Stay the $#@! out of it.

  8. #7
    Points: 141,908, Level: 90
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 1,142
    Overall activity: 28.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ransom's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    48090
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,318
    Points
    141,908
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    10,167
    Thanked 15,097x in 10,779 Posts
    Mentioned
    496 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I have posted before that we have SoF in over 18- countries. I support that.

    What I don't support is the Neocon occupation movements.
    But you support all that while claiming in another forum that our military is breaking by moving less that 600 troops to Yemen. Acting like it was this horrible strain and yet here you are supporting it.

    I support it as well, Pete. I agree with you.

    You don't support occupations in Japan, Korea, or Guam?

    Europe? Poland as Putin has just moved troops back into Ukraine?

    Bases in UAE, Iraq, Syria?

  9. #8
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497526
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,536x in 94,963 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ransom View Post
    But you support all that while claiming in another forum that our military is breaking by moving less that 600 troops to Yemen. Acting like it was this horrible strain and yet here you are supporting it.

    I support it as well, Pete. I agree with you.

    You don't support occupations in Japan, Korea, or Guam?

    Europe? Poland as Putin has just moved troops back into Ukraine?

    Bases in UAE, Iraq, Syria?
    This has been explained to you before. Our occupations after WWII were of nations that had existing civil institutions that we could support and build on. We don't have that in the Middle East or Southwest Asia.

    Stop trying to occupy the world. We don't need to. And more importantly, we don't have the resources for it.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts