It’s Astonishing That It Took This Long for the Bill Clinton Moment of Reckoning to A

[Peter1469]

It’s Astonishing That It Took This Long for the Bill Clinton Moment of Reckoning to Arrive

Slate joins the stampede to toss the Clinton's out.

One of the many remarkable things about this cavalcade of comeuppance for sexual abusers and harassers is that it’s taking down men who once seemed untouchable to the media in part because they were on the right team: editors and executives at media outlets beloved by progressives, actors and comedians who were the faces of prestige TV shows, Democratic donors. Having “good” politics, it turns out, isn’t the same thing as having good sexual politics. Donating or pontificating on behalf of progressive values doesn’t stop men from pressing their erections against unwilling colleagues, or kissing co-workers on the mouth, or taking out their penises in front of aspiring mentees.

The nonpartisan nature of the current moment of reckoning helps explain why the Bill Clinton moment has finally arrived. On Monday, Caitlin Flanagan published an essay in the Atlanticarguing that it’s time for liberals to reassess Bill Clinton’s moral legacy. On Tuesday, Michelle Goldberg wrote a column in the New York Times titled “I Believe Juanita.” “I think we got it wrong,” Matt Yglesias wrote in Vox on Wednesday. “The [Lewinsky] scandal was never about infidelity or perjury—or at least, it shouldn’t have been. It was about power in the workplace and its use.” In hindsight, he concludes, Clinton should have resigned.

[Common]

They have to throw clinton under the bus, if they want to be credible. The clintons are done as the powerbrokers of the democrat party

[Peter1469]

They have to throw clinton under the bus, if they want to be credible. The clintons are done as the powerbrokers of the democrat party

That is a good thing.

[Common]

That is a good thing.

Watch what you wish for, their replacements might be much worse.