User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Why Democrats are to blame for CFPB debacle

  1. 11-29-2017, 02:06 PM #11
    Green Arrow
    Green Arrow is offline
    Points: 158,710, Level: 95
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 2,940
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdrive50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupVeteran     Green Arrow's Avatar Overlord
    Karma
    620067
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    47,841
    Points
    158,710
    Level
    95
    Thanks Given
    54,414
    Thanked 24,816x in 16,297 Posts
    Mentioned
    1674 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Captdon View Post
    She was appointed Assistant Director the day before the head of it quit.
    Right, because one of the two dueling statutes appeared to say that she would thus have to be the new director after Corddray’s resignation.
    "Those who produce should have, but we know that those who produce the most — that is, those who work hardest, and at the most difficult and most menial tasks, have the least."
    - Eugene V. Debs (1855-1926), five-time Socialist Party candidate for U.S. President
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 11-29-2017, 05:59 PM #12
    donttread
    donttread is offline
    Points: 173,663, Level: 99
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 3,987
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran     donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88672
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52,085
    Points
    173,663
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    18,449
    Thanked 20,640x in 14,854 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Green Arrow View Post
    It’s not really the agency’s fault, there are two dueling laws that aren’t totally clear about succession. That’s the root of the problem.
    Only in America!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 11-29-2017, 06:02 PM #13
    MisterVeritis
    MisterVeritis is offline
    Points: 265,586, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 57.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive     MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308005
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,807
    Points
    265,586
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,879
    Thanked 39,379x in 27,945 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Green Arrow View Post
    Right, because one of the two dueling statutes appeared to say that she would thus have to be the new director after Corddray’s resignation.
    This is not correct. The Director was not simply unavailable. The Director quit. There was no conflict between statutes.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 11-30-2017, 12:28 AM #14
    Tahuyaman
    Tahuyaman is offline
    Points: 435,490, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial     Awards:
    Frequent Poster     Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308571
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    184,704
    Points
    435,490
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,281
    Thanked 77,586x in 55,991 Posts
    Mentioned
    707 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    This is not correct. The Director was not simply unavailable. The Director quit. There was no conflict between statutes.
    There are contrary laws. However the court ruled in the administration's favor.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
+ Reply to Thread
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules