I have been thinking for a long while about the different styles adopted by people as to their system of government, and, have come to the conclusion that they all have merits and flaws. The one I like most is capitalism, as it stimulates the growth of one for investment in another, where there needs to be expansion bringing income by producing. With the advanced laws regulating capitalism, it stands to reason that any government system inspected as much could also do well, as, the systems of the west are always debated, as there is always someone out there trying to make a name for themselves by brining down the establishment. Hell, there are whole departments set up for fighting for one law or another, one policy to be taken and so forth.

So, why not evolve certain other forms? If we set up departments for the purpose of finding 'new ways of doing things,' for systems from Socialism to Monarchism, then there would be progress for all of those. These could, as the wealth is concentrated in the state coffers often, find it's way into the private or public legal boards and law agencies and so forth to find these new methods to 'cure old wounds.'

For example, if America was to find a new economic policy for North Korea and the other communist states, then they could solidify a great term of good will between the nations and then see forth a great time of peace. This could be done within two weeks where they would dedicate a team of about four or five lawyers and economists to the problems facing each of these systems - likewise, the states of North Korea could work on the system problems of capitalism, all for good will, for free peace, yes? Why? Because you cannot see your own problems through your own agenda, but through the slants of others.

If everyone was to apply their own values to teach other's systems, this would, sooner or later, probably within two months, find countries going to the media with advice for each other, depending on what they value, of course.