It has been a while since I ventured into surface level language, where the root or emotion of the word, and the force of nature that founds the word or pursing of the lips, or, even sound, would lead to a thorough understanding of the circumstances the word is used for if linked to a picture or circumstance. Even though I profess to understand every language spoken, I as yet cannot communicate in such a manner from me to another, and, since others will have to learn how to communicate like me to understand what I am saying, I presume that I need to find grammar and other things to bolster my wording of things.
~ Soon, I will have language learning software for my Linux terminal! Then we will see...
So, what are fundamental rules of grammar that are always present? I would say this comes down to the structure being where the 'objects' need to be represented by the words around them, not adverbs, but the linking words like "the" or "if." This means we need to observe that certain words, names are easy to identify, would be surrounded by words that infer reactions, and, goals, of course.
This means that we need to get to the linking words - merely eliminating them would lead to a flow of 'characters' that would be in any order the other words would allow. Actually, all you need is the 'figures' and then you can understand that... wait... if someone loves or hates someone, that is a bit much!
So, we will go with this character arrangement and the words between them. This would be where the words between them, understood to be short, would be 'mere words.' These mere words would represent 'the proclaiming of a new character,' or, 'the foundation of a new element to consider.' If that were the case, then we would need to observe that the linking words would lead to the relationship between them, verbs being the cornerstone of the relationship, as these are "events."
Objects, events...
So, once we know the objects and events, we will understand the whole sentence, to a certain point, yes? This would lead to a understanding of the normal letters used... actually let's work with the vowels? Every language has vowels! This could come to a point where the verbs are made up by emotive language where the forces of the physical universe, or, in fact, physics is used to define the effects on the objects by the other objects, leading to a statement or comment of some sort, usually, a question or answer, mind you.
If we were to observe that in the English alphabet we will find the same letters bearing the same sounds, and all languages are written in English today as well, then we would find that it would be easy to use names to infer objects with events from vowels to infer effects on objects, of course.