Starting with Gorsuch -- The most important SCOTUS stories of 2017

[Captdon]

That is a lie.

Advice and Consent- The US Constitution. They didn't decide. Call that a lie.

[hanger4]

Not at all Crepitus, the creative interpretation is all yours. Of course you could show what in the Constitution points to any sort of theft of a SCOTUS seat. I'll wait.

Apparently I'm gonna wait quite a long time, amirite @Crepitus ??

[Crepitus]

Not at all Crepitus, the creative interpretation is all yours. Of course you could show what in the Constitution points to any sort of theft of a SCOTUS seat. I'll wait.

Please explain the phrase "advise and consent".

Hint: nowhere does it say "block and impede".

[Crepitus]

Apparently I'm gonna wait quite a long time, amirite @Crepitus ??

Some of us have jobs Hefe.

[hanger4]

Please explain the phrase "advise and consent". Hint: nowhere does it say "block and impede".

Simple Crepitus, the Senate majority advised the President there would be no consent. That's not at all hard to understand.

[hanger4]

Some of us have jobs Hefe.

You made several posts this afternoon while ignoring the question I posted at 9:50 am and have yet to answer it.

[Kalkin]

Stolen SCOTUS seat actually happened.

Stealing is illegal. Have you filed a police report?

[Crepitus]

You made several posts this afternoon while ignoring the question I posted at 9:50 am and have yet to answer it.

Started at the bottom and answered a few if I had time. Besides, I may have mentioned this before but I don't always read all of your posts.

[hanger4]

Started at the bottom and answered a few if I had time. Besides, I may have mentioned this before but I don't always read all of your posts.

That's to bad, I can be quite informative, even my questions inform if you seek the answers. Advice and consent is the sole constitutional duty of the Senate concerning Presidential nominations. When they consent or refuse consent is irrelevant.

[Crepitus]

That's to bad, I can be quite informative, even my questions inform if you seek the answers. Advice and consent is the sole constitutional duty of the Senate concerning Presidential nominations. When they consent or refuse consent is irrelevant.

Sorry dude, your shtick is to ask leading and repetitive questions to corner the incautious by forcing a misstatement. I find that both annoying and boring so I don't always feel the need to engage with you.