User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: Regulations at 'Lowest Count Since Records Began Being Kept in the Mid-1970s'

  1. #21
    Points: 68,393, Level: 63
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 357
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveSocial50000 Experience Points1 year registered
    resister's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    153996
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Arcadia Fl
    Posts
    29,321
    Points
    68,393
    Level
    63
    Thanks Given
    23,069
    Thanked 9,977x in 7,546 Posts
    Mentioned
    261 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zelmo1234 View Post
    Do you have a specific regulation that you believe will poison the earth? Just what has he done that is going to cause great damage?
    @zelmo1234 I was mocking the inevitable liberal replies, I would think Peter and Captdon, knew that.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to resister For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (01-07-2018)

  3. #22
    Points: 5,766, Level: 18
    Level completed: 3%, Points required for next Level: 584
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered5000 Experience Points
    Kacper's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1027
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,404
    Points
    5,766
    Level
    18
    Thanks Given
    495
    Thanked 1,017x in 747 Posts
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Boris The Animal View Post
    Let's hope not. Bipartisanship and compromise just means Conservatives kowtow and step and fetch for the Left.
    Not necessarily. We at least seemed to be heading in the same general direction no matter who was in power. Feels like we have been spinning wheels since at least 2008, probably closer to 2005/2006.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Kacper For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (01-07-2018)

  5. #23
    Points: 423,927, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    392394
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    140,443
    Points
    423,927
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,673
    Thanked 39,962x in 29,609 Posts
    Mentioned
    1649 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Crepitus View Post
    You are assuming that these people will think a less regulated market is more dangerous. I think they will feel safer with less regulation. I think they currently worry about running afoul of government regulators more than anything else.
    You're wandering away from the point. What are you more likely to invest in, a gamble where you might lose everything or a sure thing where you can't lose? The sure thing is what regulation tries to provide. You can't lose. But you never really gain because you suffer no consequences if you decide wrong.
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  6. #24
    Points: 98,785, Level: 76
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 1,165
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Crepitus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1253691
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    35,707
    Points
    98,785
    Level
    76
    Thanks Given
    15,916
    Thanked 11,916x in 8,660 Posts
    Mentioned
    419 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    You're wandering away from the point. What are you more likely to invest in, a gamble where you might lose everything or a sure thing where you can't lose? The sure thing is what regulation tries to provide. You can't lose. But you never really gain because you suffer no consequences if you decide wrong.
    You are wrong. Regulations don't ensure you can't lose, they make it harder for people to rip you off either by intention or negligence. Remove thse regulations and how long before some is selling "repackaged securities" to over eager investors?
    Attention:

    The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves.

    That Is All.

  7. #25
    Points: 423,927, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    392394
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    140,443
    Points
    423,927
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,673
    Thanked 39,962x in 29,609 Posts
    Mentioned
    1649 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Crepitus View Post
    You are wrong. Regulations don't ensure you can't lose, they make it harder for people to rip you off either by intention or negligence. Remove thse regulations and how long before some is selling "repackaged securities" to over eager investors?
    You are wrong. Dead wrong. There are laws against murder, right? And yet murders happen. You're confusing punative law with regulatory law that assures people their investments are safe because the government will bail you out. Such laws encourage malinvestment. Such laws led to the Great Recenssion.

    Remove the laws and you'd return to a time where reputation mattered.

    Perhaps though, since you so readily say you'd see rip offs, cheating, theft, etc, that is what you would do?
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  8. #26
    Points: 98,785, Level: 76
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 1,165
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Crepitus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1253691
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    35,707
    Points
    98,785
    Level
    76
    Thanks Given
    15,916
    Thanked 11,916x in 8,660 Posts
    Mentioned
    419 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    You are wrong. Dead wrong. There are laws against murder, right? And yet murders happen. You're confusing punative law with regulatory law that assures people their investments are safe because the government will bail you out. Such laws encourage malinvestment. Such laws led to the Great Recenssion.

    Remove the laws and you'd return to a time where reputation mattered.

    Perhaps though, since you so readily say you'd see rip offs, cheating, theft, etc, that is what you would do?
    Deregulation of banks led to the financial crisis, why would you think that deregulating them again would be any different?
    Attention:

    The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves.

    That Is All.

  9. #27
    Points: 423,927, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    392394
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    140,443
    Points
    423,927
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,673
    Thanked 39,962x in 29,609 Posts
    Mentioned
    1649 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Crepitus View Post
    Deregulation of banks led to the financial crisis, why would you think that deregulating them again would be any different?
    False again. Deregulation had nothing to do with banks or housing. There were regulations in place that everyone trusted and so malinvested.
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  10. #28
    Points: 423,927, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    392394
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    140,443
    Points
    423,927
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,673
    Thanked 39,962x in 29,609 Posts
    Mentioned
    1649 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Here you go, crep: The Political Implications of Ignoring Our Own Ignorance

    ...Regulators, too, fell victim to the combination of cognitive hubris and radical ignorance. They believed in the quality of bank risk management using the new tools.4 They also believed in the effectiveness of their own rules and practices.

    A common post-crisis narrative is that banking was de-regulated in the Reagan-Greenspan era. Some pundits make it sound as if regulators behaved like parents who hand their teenagers the keys to the liquor cabinet, leave for the weekend, and say “Have a good time.” In fact, regulators believed that they had stronger regulations in place in 2005 than they did in the pre-Reagan era.

    —Before 1980, mortgage loans held by banks were illiquid assets subject to considerable interest-rate risk. These problems were alleviated by the shift toward securitization.

    —Before 1980, insolvent institutions were opaque because of book-value accounting. This problem was addressed with market-value accounting, enabling regulators to take more timely corrective action to address troubled institutions.

    —Before 1980, banks had no formal capital requirements and there were no mechanisms in place to steer banks away from risky assets. This problem was addressed with the Basel capital accords (formally adopted in 1988), which incorporated a risk-weighted measure of assets to determine required minimum capital. In the 2000s, these risk weightings were altered to penalize banks that did not invest in highly rated, asset-backed securities.

    Thus, it was not the intent of regulators to loosen the reins on banks. On the contrary, from the regulators’ point of view, it was the environment prior to 1980 that amounted to leaving the teenagers with the keys to the liquor cabinet. The post-1980 regulatory changes were believed to be in the direction of tighter supervision and more rational controls.

    ...
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  11. #29
    Points: 98,785, Level: 76
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 1,165
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Crepitus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1253691
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    35,707
    Points
    98,785
    Level
    76
    Thanks Given
    15,916
    Thanked 11,916x in 8,660 Posts
    Mentioned
    419 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    False again. Deregulation had nothing to do with banks or housing. There were regulations in place that everyone trusted and so malinvested.
    I and others disagree.

    https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/82639
    Attention:

    The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves.

    That Is All.

  12. #30
    Points: 98,785, Level: 76
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 1,165
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Crepitus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1253691
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    35,707
    Points
    98,785
    Level
    76
    Thanks Given
    15,916
    Thanked 11,916x in 8,660 Posts
    Mentioned
    419 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    That is a minority view, and seeks to explain away reasonable conclusions like regulatory failure simply for the purpose of encouraging a lax regulatory atmosphere.
    Attention:

    The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves.

    That Is All.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO