User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: Regulations at 'Lowest Count Since Records Began Being Kept in the Mid-1970s'

  1. #1
    Points: 423,927, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    392394
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    140,443
    Points
    423,927
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,673
    Thanked 39,962x in 29,609 Posts
    Mentioned
    1649 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Regulations at 'Lowest Count Since Records Began Being Kept in the Mid-1970s'

    Great subtitle: "Economy advances while administrative state recedes; lefty commentators hardest hit."

    Regulations at 'Lowest Count Since Records Began Being Kept in the Mid-1970s'

    "Trump's Deregulatory Binge Makes the Bush Years Look Like Stalinist Russia," runs the headline in The Daily Banter, a website that was "started in 2007 when Editor in Chief Ben Cohen got fed up with watching the corporate news not doing its job properly," and that further claims "not do viral content" or "trick readers with misleading headlines." (Cohen's misleading subhed, by the way, begins: "The Bush years were characterized by a deregulatory binge that saw deep cuts to virtually all aspects of government with little to no reasoning behind them," despite the fact that people who actually study this stuff will inform you that Bush increased the reach, budget, and staffing of the administrative state—including on financial regulation—at a far greater clip than his Democratic predecessor, while overseeing an eight-year government spending bender.)

    An infinitely better reported, yet ultimately even more unintentionally amusing effort came in Monday's New York Times, which contained plenty of now-hold-on-there sentences like "The evidence is weak that regulation actually reduces economic activity or that deregulation stimulates it," and "There is little historical evidence tying regulation levels to growth," and "Regulatory proponents say, in fact, that those rules can have positive economic effects in the long run, saving companies from violations that could cost them both financially and reputationally."

    Why is that funny? Because much of the rest of the article is composed of quotes and data from actual business humans about why they're investing so much more money during the Trump presidency. Stuff like, "That [regulatory] burden has slowed down economic growth, it's slowed down investment in infrastructure [in the past]. And what we've seen over the last year is a big deregulatory environment." The preponderance of feel-good evidence is such that the Times headlined the piece "The Trump Effect," and began it with these two almost startlingly upbeat paragraphs:
    A wave of optimism has swept over American business leaders, and it is beginning to translate into the sort of investment in new plants, equipment and factory upgrades that bolsters economic growth, spurs job creation — and may finally raise wages significantly.

    While business leaders are eager for the tax cuts that take effect this year, the newfound confidence was initially inspired by the Trump administration's regulatory pullback, not so much because deregulation is saving companies money but because the administration has instilled a faith in business executives that new regulations are not coming.

    ...

    I don't much like Trump, his nationalism, his protectionism, etc etc, but this deregulation is damned good!
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (01-06-2018),zelmo1234 (01-06-2018)

  3. #2
    Points: 423,927, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    392394
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    140,443
    Points
    423,927
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,673
    Thanked 39,962x in 29,609 Posts
    Mentioned
    1649 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    And with less regulation to administer it stands to reason that Federal Government Cut 16,000 Jobs in 2017

    The federal government employed 16,000 fewer people in December 2017 than it did in December 2016, according to data released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    State governments employed 19,000 fewer people in December 2017 than they did in December 2016.

    However, overall government employment in the United States increased by a net 42,000 during 2017 because of the 77,000 jobs added by local governments from December 2016 to December 2017.

    The federal government in December 2016 employed 2,819,000 people, according to BLS. By December 2017, that had dropped to 2,803,000—a decrease of 16,000.

    ...
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  4. #3
    Points: 49,100, Level: 54
    Level completed: 14%, Points required for next Level: 1,550
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    nathanbforrest45's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    69239
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    In a house on a hill
    Posts
    18,579
    Points
    49,100
    Level
    54
    Thanks Given
    3,462
    Thanked 7,538x in 5,407 Posts
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    16000 out of almost 3 million? That is .05% of the total work force. There are more government employees on break at any given time than that. Tell me something has been accomplished when we hit half a million or more.
    Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.
    Robert A. Heinlein

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nathanbforrest45 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (01-06-2018),stjames1_53 (01-06-2018)

  6. #4
    Points: 423,927, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    392394
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    140,443
    Points
    423,927
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,673
    Thanked 39,962x in 29,609 Posts
    Mentioned
    1649 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
    16000 out of almost 3 million? That is .05% of the total work force. There are more government employees on break at any given time than that. Tell me something has been accomplished when we hit half a million or more.
    Agree, it's small, but a step in the right direction. One small step for man....
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (01-06-2018)

  8. #5
    Points: 5,766, Level: 18
    Level completed: 3%, Points required for next Level: 584
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered5000 Experience Points
    Kacper's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1027
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,404
    Points
    5,766
    Level
    18
    Thanks Given
    495
    Thanked 1,017x in 747 Posts
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ironically Al Gore wanted to do this too and he lost

  9. #6
    Points: 68,393, Level: 63
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 357
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveSocial50000 Experience Points1 year registered
    resister's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    153996
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Arcadia Fl
    Posts
    29,321
    Points
    68,393
    Level
    63
    Thanks Given
    23,069
    Thanked 9,977x in 7,546 Posts
    Mentioned
    261 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In before, Trump does not care about the environment, Trump is letting his cronies poison the earth.

  10. #7
    Points: 423,927, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    392394
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    140,443
    Points
    423,927
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,673
    Thanked 39,962x in 29,609 Posts
    Mentioned
    1649 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kacper View Post
    Ironically Al Gore wanted to do this too and he lost
    Do what? Cut regulations, govt workers?
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  11. #8
    Original Ranter
    Points: 467,164, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    413877
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    142,896
    Points
    467,164
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    82,210
    Thanked 64,850x in 44,304 Posts
    Mentioned
    2159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cutting regulations is one big success over the last year.
    Alea iacta est

    Check out the blog.


  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (01-07-2018),zelmo1234 (01-06-2018)

  13. #9
    Points: 96,099, Level: 75
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 1,251
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    zelmo1234's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    148068
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    MICHIGAN
    Posts
    37,373
    Points
    96,099
    Level
    75
    Thanks Given
    14,605
    Thanked 11,345x in 8,390 Posts
    Mentioned
    356 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by resister View Post
    In before, Trump does not care about the environment, Trump is letting his cronies poison the earth.
    Do you have a specific regulation that you believe will poison the earth? Just what has he done that is going to cause great damage?

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zelmo1234 For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (01-06-2018),Peter1469 (01-06-2018)

  15. #10
    Points: 17,097, Level: 31
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 353
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Newpublius's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    38098
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Riverdale, NJ
    Posts
    6,040
    Points
    17,097
    Level
    31
    Thanks Given
    1,259
    Thanked 3,081x in 2,115 Posts
    Mentioned
    93 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
    16000 out of almost 3 million? That is .05% of the total work force. There are more government employees on break at any given time than that. Tell me something has been accomplished when we hit half a million or more.
    Fair enough but remember the population continues to grow. If they could just freeze government in terms of employees/spending, in 10 years, it would be demonstrably smaller in relative terms.

    A nominal decrease is wonderful actually.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO