User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: 2018 Looks Like an Arms Bonanza

  1. #21
    Points: 160,023, Level: 95
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 1,627
    Overall activity: 99.7%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    256644
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton Washington or Sayulita Mexico depending on the time of year.
    Posts
    70,738
    Points
    160,023
    Level
    95
    Thanks Given
    8,103
    Thanked 25,608x in 19,245 Posts
    Mentioned
    380 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Our force is broken and needs to be rebuilt. And the focus needs to be on near peer adviseries.
    Correct.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    Grokmaster (01-11-2018)

  3. #22
    Points: 160,023, Level: 95
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 1,627
    Overall activity: 99.7%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    256644
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton Washington or Sayulita Mexico depending on the time of year.
    Posts
    70,738
    Points
    160,023
    Level
    95
    Thanks Given
    8,103
    Thanked 25,608x in 19,245 Posts
    Mentioned
    380 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    It does seem rather odd then that those obsolete aircraft and naval ships are not junked but sold to other countries that get another 10 to 20 serviceable years out of them. Do they just have better mechanics or could those who really want new toys be dragging their feet on repairs deliberately to make the stats look bad? In government, if you don't make a case for getting rid of something, you'll never get anything new. So if you keep the older planes and ships in really good working order then it's much harder to justify buying new ones.
    Name one of these nations which would be interested in buying our worn out nuclear powered aircraft carriers or fighter jets?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    Grokmaster (01-11-2018)

  5. #23
    Points: 46,138, Level: 52
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 912
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Grokmaster's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5755
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    9,678
    Points
    46,138
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    11,960
    Thanked 5,586x in 3,824 Posts
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Why? Is there any military out there that is more modern or any bad guys with better weapons? Is this really about need or want?
    We have aircraft, and other pieces of equipment we cannot deploy because there aren't the parts needed to maintain them. That's a problem.
    De Oppresso Liber



  6. #24
    Points: 112,175, Level: 81
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 1,475
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    Dr. Who's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    858749
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Gallifrey
    Posts
    46,208
    Points
    112,175
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    963
    Thanked 1,005x in 713 Posts
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    We have aircraft, and other pieces of equipment we cannot deploy because there aren't the parts needed to maintain them. That's a problem.
    Millwrights can reproduce any parts if they are made from metal. Furthermore, if the US government approaches the original manufacturers for parts and suggests that they will be off the list of contenders for new equipment unless they can provide replacement parts, do you really think that they will give their biggest customer the middle finger? I don't think so.
    "The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
    Mahatma Gandhi

  7. #25
    Points: 46,138, Level: 52
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 912
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Grokmaster's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5755
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    9,678
    Points
    46,138
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    11,960
    Thanked 5,586x in 3,824 Posts
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Millwrights can reproduce any parts if they are made from metal. Furthermore, if the US government approaches the original manufacturers for parts and suggests that they will be off the list of contenders for new equipment unless they can provide replacement parts, do you really think that they will give their biggest customer the middle finger? I don't think so.
    Ummm...you aren't getting this, are you? No one is saying that we cannot get the parts; we DO NOT HAVE THE PARTS, (etal) because our last POTUS was a democrat, and , he like every democrat in the past 40 years, has CUT THE DEPT. of DEFENSE budget to the bone, forcing his republican successor to REBUILD IT, just like Reagan had to; just like GW Bush had to; just like Trump HAS to.

    The left ALWAYS neglects the military.
    De Oppresso Liber



  8. #26
    Points: 32,824, Level: 44
    Level completed: 25%, Points required for next Level: 1,126
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    177597
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    14,691
    Points
    32,824
    Level
    44
    Thanks Given
    9
    Thanked 9,278x in 5,987 Posts
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    It does seem rather odd then that those obsolete aircraft and naval ships are not junked but sold to other countries that get another 10 to 20 serviceable years out of them. Do they just have better mechanics or could those who really want new toys be dragging their feet on repairs deliberately to make the stats look bad? In government, if you don't make a case for getting rid of something, you'll never get anything new. So if you keep the older planes and ships in really good working order then it's much harder to justify buying new ones.
    That is not really the issue.
    Gentlemen and ladies, I hate inflation, I hate taxes, and I hate Communism. Do something about it.” Ronald Reagan's instructions to his first assembled Cabinet.

  9. #27
    Points: 32,824, Level: 44
    Level completed: 25%, Points required for next Level: 1,126
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    177597
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    14,691
    Points
    32,824
    Level
    44
    Thanks Given
    9
    Thanked 9,278x in 5,987 Posts
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Millwrights can reproduce any parts if they are made from metal. Furthermore, if the US government approaches the original manufacturers for parts and suggests that they will be off the list of contenders for new equipment unless they can provide replacement parts, do you really think that they will give their biggest customer the middle finger? I don't think so.
    Again, that is only a small part of the problem. Technology advances. Weapons become more lethal. If we deploy a new tank that at the time it is unveiled is faster, stronger, can outrun and outgun every other tank in the world, our enemies and potential enemies are going to do what they can to develop weapons to kill it and neutralize that superiority. Once they develop those weapons, the effectiveness of that tank is greatly diminished. Now, we can keep putting band aids on it to try to counter some of those weapons, but eventually, we will have no choice but to build a better tank (or plane or ship).

    Force modernization is about a whole lot more than just keeping things running.
    Gentlemen and ladies, I hate inflation, I hate taxes, and I hate Communism. Do something about it.” Ronald Reagan's instructions to his first assembled Cabinet.

  10. #28
    Points: 97,071, Level: 75
    Level completed: 90%, Points required for next Level: 279
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    78342
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    32,549
    Points
    97,071
    Level
    75
    Thanks Given
    4,567
    Thanked 10,307x in 7,750 Posts
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob the Slob View Post
    https://www.commondreams.org/views/2...s-arms-bonanza



    We already have more weapons than all nations combined. This is a ploy from Reagan's playbook on making the rich richer. Guarantee ol' Trumper is heavily invested in the MIC.

    Trust me those companies didn't exactly "suffer" under Obama . Who's the world's biggest gun runners? We are. We are.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO