User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: 2018 Looks Like an Arms Bonanza

  1. #21
    Points: 148,599, Level: 92
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 1,651
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    253684
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton Washington or Sayulita Mexico depending on the time of year.
    Posts
    65,590
    Points
    148,599
    Level
    92
    Thanks Given
    7,543
    Thanked 22,648x in 17,057 Posts
    Mentioned
    364 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Our force is broken and needs to be rebuilt. And the focus needs to be on near peer adviseries.
    Correct.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    Grokmaster (01-11-2018)

  3. #22
    Points: 148,599, Level: 92
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 1,651
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    253684
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton Washington or Sayulita Mexico depending on the time of year.
    Posts
    65,590
    Points
    148,599
    Level
    92
    Thanks Given
    7,543
    Thanked 22,648x in 17,057 Posts
    Mentioned
    364 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    It does seem rather odd then that those obsolete aircraft and naval ships are not junked but sold to other countries that get another 10 to 20 serviceable years out of them. Do they just have better mechanics or could those who really want new toys be dragging their feet on repairs deliberately to make the stats look bad? In government, if you don't make a case for getting rid of something, you'll never get anything new. So if you keep the older planes and ships in really good working order then it's much harder to justify buying new ones.
    Name one of these nations which would be interested in buying our worn out nuclear powered aircraft carriers or fighter jets?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    Grokmaster (01-11-2018)

  5. #23
    Points: 45,577, Level: 52
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 1,473
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Grokmaster's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5729
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    9,640
    Points
    45,577
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    11,888
    Thanked 5,560x in 3,807 Posts
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Why? Is there any military out there that is more modern or any bad guys with better weapons? Is this really about need or want?
    We have aircraft, and other pieces of equipment we cannot deploy because there aren't the parts needed to maintain them. That's a problem.
    De Oppresso Liber



  6. #24
    Points: 108,408, Level: 80
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 2,242
    Overall activity: 54.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Dr. Who's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    858153
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    44,710
    Points
    108,408
    Level
    80
    Thanks Given
    368
    Thanked 409x in 286 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    We have aircraft, and other pieces of equipment we cannot deploy because there aren't the parts needed to maintain them. That's a problem.
    Millwrights can reproduce any parts if they are made from metal. Furthermore, if the US government approaches the original manufacturers for parts and suggests that they will be off the list of contenders for new equipment unless they can provide replacement parts, do you really think that they will give their biggest customer the middle finger? I don't think so.
    "The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
    Mahatma Gandhi

  7. #25
    Points: 45,577, Level: 52
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 1,473
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Grokmaster's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5729
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    9,640
    Points
    45,577
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    11,888
    Thanked 5,560x in 3,807 Posts
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Millwrights can reproduce any parts if they are made from metal. Furthermore, if the US government approaches the original manufacturers for parts and suggests that they will be off the list of contenders for new equipment unless they can provide replacement parts, do you really think that they will give their biggest customer the middle finger? I don't think so.
    Ummm...you aren't getting this, are you? No one is saying that we cannot get the parts; we DO NOT HAVE THE PARTS, (etal) because our last POTUS was a democrat, and , he like every democrat in the past 40 years, has CUT THE DEPT. of DEFENSE budget to the bone, forcing his republican successor to REBUILD IT, just like Reagan had to; just like GW Bush had to; just like Trump HAS to.

    The left ALWAYS neglects the military.
    De Oppresso Liber



  8. #26
    Points: 31,133, Level: 43
    Level completed: 6%, Points required for next Level: 1,317
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    176838
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    13,964
    Points
    31,133
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    6
    Thanked 8,519x in 5,543 Posts
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    It does seem rather odd then that those obsolete aircraft and naval ships are not junked but sold to other countries that get another 10 to 20 serviceable years out of them. Do they just have better mechanics or could those who really want new toys be dragging their feet on repairs deliberately to make the stats look bad? In government, if you don't make a case for getting rid of something, you'll never get anything new. So if you keep the older planes and ships in really good working order then it's much harder to justify buying new ones.
    That is not really the issue.
    Gentlemen and ladies, I hate inflation, I hate taxes, and I hate Communism. Do something about it.” Ronald Reagan's instructions to his first assembled Cabinet.

  9. #27
    Points: 31,133, Level: 43
    Level completed: 6%, Points required for next Level: 1,317
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    176838
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    13,964
    Points
    31,133
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    6
    Thanked 8,519x in 5,543 Posts
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Millwrights can reproduce any parts if they are made from metal. Furthermore, if the US government approaches the original manufacturers for parts and suggests that they will be off the list of contenders for new equipment unless they can provide replacement parts, do you really think that they will give their biggest customer the middle finger? I don't think so.
    Again, that is only a small part of the problem. Technology advances. Weapons become more lethal. If we deploy a new tank that at the time it is unveiled is faster, stronger, can outrun and outgun every other tank in the world, our enemies and potential enemies are going to do what they can to develop weapons to kill it and neutralize that superiority. Once they develop those weapons, the effectiveness of that tank is greatly diminished. Now, we can keep putting band aids on it to try to counter some of those weapons, but eventually, we will have no choice but to build a better tank (or plane or ship).

    Force modernization is about a whole lot more than just keeping things running.
    Gentlemen and ladies, I hate inflation, I hate taxes, and I hate Communism. Do something about it.” Ronald Reagan's instructions to his first assembled Cabinet.

  10. #28
    Points: 92,638, Level: 74
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 2,112
    Overall activity: 66.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    77714
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    30,918
    Points
    92,638
    Level
    74
    Thanks Given
    4,159
    Thanked 9,679x in 7,272 Posts
    Mentioned
    198 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob the Slob View Post
    https://www.commondreams.org/views/2...s-arms-bonanza



    We already have more weapons than all nations combined. This is a ploy from Reagan's playbook on making the rich richer. Guarantee ol' Trumper is heavily invested in the MIC.

    Trust me those companies didn't exactly "suffer" under Obama . Who's the world's biggest gun runners? We are. We are.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO