President Trump used inelegant (and downright vulgar) language in his denunciation of certain countries, and their residents. That said, I have a strong feeling that almost all of those who are currently denouncing him for this speech infraction were never fans of Donald Trump, anyway. In logic, there is a fallacy known as the a priori fallacy. It works something like this: If one is predisposed to like something (or someone), then one will seize upon anything favorable to it (or him, or her), while dismissing, out of hand, anything unfavorable. Likewise, if one is predisposed to dislike something (or someone), then one will seize upon anything unfavorable to it (or him, or her), while dismissing, out of hand, anything favorable. Does the relevance here seem obvious?