User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47

Thread: US plans new low yield nuclear weapons

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497548
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,558x in 94,978 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    US plans new low yield nuclear weapons

    US plans new low yield nuclear weapons

    Russia has low yield nuclear weapons and its military doctrine calls for using them to force NATO into a peace favorable to Russia. The US could not respond with strategic nuclear weapons without risking a wholesale nuclear exchange. So the US wants to develop low yield nuclear weapons as a counter.

    The Pentagon is planning to develop two new sea-based nuclear weapons to respond to Russia and China’s growing military capabilities, according to a sweeping Defense Department review of nuclear strategy.

    The planned move has ignited a broad debate over future U.S. nuclear strategy at a time when the nation also faces the threat of proliferation, in particular from North Korea’s efforts to expand its arsenal of nuclear weapons and develop long-range missiles capable of delivering them.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (01-17-2018)

  3. #2
    Points: 435,957, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308630
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    184,848
    Points
    435,957
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,293
    Thanked 77,645x in 56,028 Posts
    Mentioned
    707 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    The US has both tactical and strategic nuclear weapons. Is the "low yield" variety less than a tactical nuclear weapon?
    Last edited by Tahuyaman; 01-18-2018 at 12:23 AM.

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497548
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,558x in 94,978 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahuyaman View Post
    The US has both tactical and strategic nuclear weapons. Is the "low yield" variety less than a tactical nuclear weapon?
    They are tactical; not strategic.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  5. #4
    Points: 435,957, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308630
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    184,848
    Points
    435,957
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,293
    Thanked 77,645x in 56,028 Posts
    Mentioned
    707 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    They are tactical; not strategic.
    My question is, are they a lesser yield than our current inventory of tactical nuclear weapons?

  6. #5
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497548
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,558x in 94,978 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahuyaman View Post
    My question is, are they a lesser yield than our current inventory of tactical nuclear weapons?
    I would assume the cruise missile one would be. These are just two new options to counter Russian and Chinese capabilities.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  7. #6
    Points: 435,957, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308630
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    184,848
    Points
    435,957
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,293
    Thanked 77,645x in 56,028 Posts
    Mentioned
    707 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I would assume the cruise missile one would be. These are just two new options to counter Russian and Chinese capabilities.

    That's a means of delivery. I'm trying to figure out what the yield would be. I can't find anything which discloses that. I'm guessing it's the same yield as our current stockpile of tactical nukes.

  8. #7
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497548
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,558x in 94,978 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahuyaman View Post
    That's a means of delivery. I'm trying to figure out what the yield would be. I can't find anything which discloses that. I'm guessing it's the same yield as our current stockpile of tactical nukes.
    I would imagine that the yield is classified.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  9. #8
    Points: 265,868, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 75.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308028
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,889
    Points
    265,868
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,931
    Thanked 39,402x in 27,956 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What do we have in the inventory today?

    Number of nuclear weapon types in the current U.S. arsenal: Seven

    1) for submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs)
    W76 and W88 warheads
    2) for intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs)
    W78 and W87 warheads
    3) for the air-launched cruise missile (ALCM)
    W80 warheads
    4) for gravity bombs
    B61 (multiple variants) and B83. (Some variable yield nuclear warheads such as the B61 nuclear bomb have been produced in both tactical and strategic versions. Whereas the lowest selectable yield of a tactical B61 (Mod 3 and Mod 4) is 0.3 kilotons (300 tons),[17]With the introduction of the B61 Mod 12, the United States will have four hundred identical nuclear bombs whose strategic or tactical nature will be set purely by the mission and target as well as type of aircraft on which they are carried [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_nuclear_weapon]

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/50-facts-about-u-s-nuclear-weapons-today/

    Are there other weapons?
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  10. #9
    Points: 34,178, Level: 45
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 1,272
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranYour first Group
    jimmyz's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    176619
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    11,597
    Points
    34,178
    Level
    45
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 6,315x in 4,381 Posts
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any new idea to keep pace with Russian and Chinese low yield weapons deployment and use doctrine is a good idea.
    " I'm old-fashioned. I like two sexes! And another thing, all of a sudden I don't like being married to what is known as a 'new woman'. I want a wife, not a competitor. Competitor! Competitor!" - Spencer Tracy in 'Adam's Rib' (1949)

    Art thou every retard among us related to thine uncle or mistress by way of moral or illegitimate rendezvous? Thus, we are one side of the other's coin by luck or pluck. - Jimmyz

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmyz For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (01-18-2018)

  12. #10
    Points: 265,868, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 75.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308028
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,889
    Points
    265,868
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,931
    Thanked 39,402x in 27,956 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I would imagine that the yield is classified.
    I am confident the yield will be selectable. I have a range of yields in mind but won't speculate.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (01-18-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts