User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Ohio Supreme Court Won't Hear Cleveland Gun Registry Case

  1. #1

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 473,012, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 71.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    200762
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    52,916
    Points
    473,012
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,060
    Thanked 46,032x in 24,871 Posts
    Mentioned
    886 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Ohio Supreme Court Won't Hear Cleveland Gun Registry Case

    Ohio Supreme Court Won’t Hear Cleveland Gun Registry Case

    The Ohio Supreme Court is refusing to hear Cleveland’s appeal of a lower court ruling rejecting the city’s efforts at creating a gun offender registry. Cleveland.com reports the court’s refusal on Wednesday to hear the appeal means most of the measures passed by the City Council in 2015 to address gun violence remain invalid. The registry would have required residents charged with gun offenses to register within five days of being convicted or released from prison.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  2. #2
    Points: 124,894, Level: 85
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 1,156
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Crepitus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1255215
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    41,416
    Points
    124,894
    Level
    85
    Thanks Given
    17,385
    Thanked 13,440x in 9,812 Posts
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why not? We require sex offenders to register.
    People who think a movie about plastic dolls is trying to turn their kids gay or trans are now officially known as

    Barbie Q’s

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Crepitus For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (02-03-2018)

  4. #3
    Points: 80,676, Level: 69
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 1,774
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    countryboy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    28213
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    28,642
    Points
    80,676
    Level
    69
    Thanks Given
    10,466
    Thanked 21,450x in 13,505 Posts
    Mentioned
    230 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Crepitus View Post
    Why not? We require sex offenders to register.
    We should require leftist loons to register. Liberalism is after all, a recognized mental disorder.
    Cutesy Time is OVER

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to countryboy For This Useful Post:

    Kalkin (02-03-2018)

  6. #4
    Points: 7,766, Level: 21
    Level completed: 3%, Points required for next Level: 684
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second Class5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MrMike's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    3666
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Rent free in your mind....
    Posts
    600
    Points
    7,766
    Level
    21
    Thanks Given
    1,246
    Thanked 683x in 366 Posts
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I actually agree with the registry for those convicted of gun offenses. Not a bad idea.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MrMike For This Useful Post:

    gamewell45 (02-03-2018),Peter1469 (02-03-2018)

  8. #5
    Points: 124,894, Level: 85
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 1,156
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Crepitus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1255215
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    41,416
    Points
    124,894
    Level
    85
    Thanks Given
    17,385
    Thanked 13,440x in 9,812 Posts
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by countryboy View Post
    We should require leftist loons to register. Liberalism is after all, a recognized mental disorder.
    Maybe we should require those of below average IQ to register. You could be first.
    People who think a movie about plastic dolls is trying to turn their kids gay or trans are now officially known as

    Barbie Q’s

  9. #6
    Points: 84,523, Level: 70
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 327
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Captdon's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12826
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Charleston South Carolina
    Posts
    38,294
    Points
    84,523
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    67,690
    Thanked 12,837x in 10,134 Posts
    Mentioned
    161 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Crepitus View Post
    Why not? We require sex offenders to register.
    The right to gun ownership is a right. Sex offenses aren't. Hard to figure this one out? Creepy.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Captdon For This Useful Post:

    Kalkin (02-03-2018)

  11. #7
    Points: 7,766, Level: 21
    Level completed: 3%, Points required for next Level: 684
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second Class5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MrMike's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    3666
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Rent free in your mind....
    Posts
    600
    Points
    7,766
    Level
    21
    Thanks Given
    1,246
    Thanked 683x in 366 Posts
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Captdon View Post
    The right to gun ownership is a right. Sex offenses aren't. Hard to figure this one out? Creepy.
    I think the rationale is that is someone commits a crime using a gun, it's fair to say they probably will again. I would think that crime (and using a gun during it) is a fair tradeoff to have them register.

    In reality, I would even go so far as to say they should be restricted from owning one, but that determination would be leveled based on the severity of the crime. That part is a little murky and likely to be abused/misinterpreted.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to MrMike For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (02-03-2018)

  13. #8

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 74,308, Level: 66
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 1,142
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    195692
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    32,309
    Points
    74,308
    Level
    66
    Thanks Given
    3,678
    Thanked 27,377x in 15,846 Posts
    Mentioned
    412 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any kind of registry is a bad idea. They are wrong, pure and simple.

    It doesn't matter whether it is a registry of gun offenders, sex offenders, adulterers, or jaywalkers.
    “Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.” - Barry Goldwater

  14. #9
    Original Ranter
    Points: 858,800, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 92.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496507
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,609
    Points
    858,800
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,188
    Thanked 147,517x in 94,378 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
    I actually agree with the registry for those convicted of gun offenses. Not a bad idea.
    Me too. I am all for the 2nd Amendment, but if you misuse a gun for criminal purposes your 2nd Amendment rights should be stripped from you.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MrMike (02-03-2018)

  16. #10

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 74,308, Level: 66
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 1,142
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    195692
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    32,309
    Points
    74,308
    Level
    66
    Thanks Given
    3,678
    Thanked 27,377x in 15,846 Posts
    Mentioned
    412 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Me too. I am all for the 2nd Amendment, but if you misuse a gun for criminal purposes your 2nd Amendment rights should be stripped from you.
    They are, but that is a separate issue from a national or state registry.
    “Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.” - Barry Goldwater

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts