"Claims" being the operative word, and they are claims made by the heavily biased attorney representing the mother in this custody dispute.
And if what this attorney says is true, that such testimony would be "sufficient" in a criminal court, then why hasn't the father been charged criminally?
Let me guess. The criminal side of the court is in cahoots with the patriarchy?
Well, one example of something certainly proves your case. Because the opposite thing, where a mother lies or exaggerates, has never happened before, right?Just pointing that out, as you appear to have missed the whole point that the article I linked to was making.
I am a living example of that claim being BS. My abusive dad falsely claimed that my mom had put words in my mouth in court and won primary custody. So don't tell me that doesn't happen!