Evangelical Christians Support Trump Over Alleged Stormy Daniels Affair,

[MMC]

The first article posted compares it to the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The problem with pointing at a religious group and saying, "See - they still support Trump!" is that historically they've been inconsistent on the issue depending on the person involved (ignore Clinton - vastly different circumstances). If it were revealed tomorrow that Schumer had an extramarital affair with no legal or ethical implications for his position, the fundamentalist Evangelical right would lose their $#@!. I am not keen on hypocrisy. It is not just this group or just religious groups or the right, either. Selective outrage is pretty common by a lot of groups.

If adults want to sleep around or have affairs or whatever, and there are no legal or ethical issues, who cares? What a politician does privately does not matter unless it's illegal or an abuse of office or something.

You forget.....CNN and the Lame Stream was the one driving the narrative about Christian Conservatives. Their the ones that went looking for them specifically. Hence the ABC poll. So they were looking to target Christians over the morality.


Yet they want to cry out Hypocrisy knowing just how they were hypocrites and got called so for the same crap over Bilbo Clinton. Over FDR, over Ted Kennedy. Because at those times. They said nothing. Avoided the call out. Didn't want to keep that issue current....due to the leftist agenda due to their fellow kindred spirit.


CNN’s christian conservative women’s panel on Stormy backfires: ‘Whatever … we didn’t elect a choir boy’.....


A panel of Christian women who voted for President Donald Trump were gathered by CNN to watch and react to porn star Stormy Daniels’ “60 Minute” interview that aired on Sunday night.


The ladies seemed to agree that Daniels was “enjoying this way too much,” and were steadfast in their support for the president, understanding this story is just the latest salvo in an ongoing effort to take down Trump.


“She was shopping her story for money, just like all the other people that have tried to make money off the Trump name,” said one woman.


“This is a porn star, why are we giving it any credibility?” asked participant Sherry Massey. “And the fact that she now wants to come out with a story because she’s afraid of her children? My goodness, what did you tell the kiddos about your full-time job?





The women collectively doubted Daniels’ claim she had sex with Trump, insisting that the aging porn star came forward for money.


And therein lies the problem for too many in this country, an irrational, unhinged refusal to accept Donald Trump as commander in chief.


Another consistency is recognizing the ongoing media campaign to destroy Trump.


You can throw all that stuff up in our faces as many times as you want,” Dr. Lynette Bryant said, “but that means that we’ll work harder for Trump. Is that not so, ladies?”


“That’s correct,” replied Sylvia Guzman. “This is the media defining the narrative. The people — we, the people — are ready to define the narrative. And it’s not about tawdry sexual peccadilloes.



CNN host Randi Kaye tried to prevent the ladies from tying the Stormy Daniels story into an overall campaign to destroy Trump, but the women proved to be more savvy than she may have realized.


“You’re looking for a way to impeach my president,” said Bryant, adding that she “worked very hard” for him......snip~


https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/03...oir-boy-617725#

[Abby08]

Someone getting rich off this.

Look up, 'golddigger,' there's her picture.

[MMC]

Look up, 'golddigger,' there's her picture.

[NapRover]

Trump is denying this. Maybe that’s why Stormy’s lawyer wants to depose him under oath. If he lies under oath, we’ll have the same result as Clinton: impeachment.

[Grokmaster]

The first article posted compares it to the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The problem with pointing at a religious group and saying, "See - they still support Trump!" is that historically they've been inconsistent on the issue depending on the person involved (ignore Clinton - vastly different circumstances). If it were revealed tomorrow that Schumer had an extramarital affair with no legal or ethical implications for his position, the fundamentalist Evangelical right would lose their $#@!. I am not keen on hypocrisy. It is not just this group or just religious groups or the right, either. Selective outrage is pretty common by a lot of groups.

If adults want to sleep around or have affairs or whatever, and there are no legal or ethical issues, who cares? What a politician does privately does not matter unless it's illegal or an abuse of office or something.

You blithely overlook the FACT that there is no question than Clinton had intimate relations with Lewinski, (DNA), and LIED ABOUT IT UNDER OATH IN A COURT OF LAW.

There is ZERO evidence that Trump did anything more than allow the Blowjob Queen to gold dig at one of his golf tourneys.

Once is UNDENAIBLE FACT, the other UNSUBSTANTIATED ALLEGATION.

Big Diff.

[Grokmaster]

Maybe, it's because Christians dislike $#@!s more than they hate Trump.

Or that one is a PROVEN FACT, and the other is unsubstantiated claims made by someone BEING PAID to discredit the POTUS...?

[Grokmaster]

Trump is denying this. Maybe that’s why Stormy’s lawyer wants to depose him under oath. If he lies under oath, we’ll have the same result as Clinton: impeachment.

You're missing something BIG; there was DNA PROOF of Clinton's actions, and those actions were called into question as pertinent to an already-enjoined Federal lawsuit for sexual harassment, against Clinton, on behalf of Paula Jones.

Nothing remotely similar to that is present in the DNC funded Daniela Circus.

Daniels has proof of NOTHING besides her being allowed on the premises at a golf tourney.

Her DNC-OPERTIVE attorney is seeking to DEFAME the POTUS, nothing more.

[Adelaide]

You blithely overlook the FACT that there is no question than Clinton had intimate relations with Lewinski, (DNA), and LIED ABOUT IT UNDER OATH IN A COURT OF LAW.

There is ZERO evidence that Trump did anything more than allow the Blowjob Queen to gold dig at one of his golf tourneys.

Once is UNDENAIBLE FACT, the other UNSUBSTANTIATED ALLEGATION.

Big Diff.

Apparently you don't know what, "ignore Clinton - vastly different circumstances" means.

[Grokmaster]

Apparently you don't know what, "ignore Clinton - vastly different circumstances" means.

I'm sorry...I scanned over that too fast. Please accept my apology.

cat mercy beg eyes.gif

[Peter1469]

Trump is denying this. Maybe that’s why Stormy’s lawyer wants to depose him under oath. If he lies under oath, we’ll have the same result as Clinton: impeachment.

She will be deposed as well.