User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Ct Finds Sharing nude photos of current or ex-partners protected under 1st Amd

  1. #11
    Points: 9,919, Level: 23
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 131
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsSocialTagger Second Class1 year registered
    Trish's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    6896
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,783
    Points
    9,919
    Level
    23
    Thanks Given
    1,554
    Thanked 2,027x in 1,235 Posts
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    The Court has long held that nudity is not obscenity -- even pornography. Thus, this is constitutionally protected speech, subject to ownership, minors etc. You can damage someone with your free speech, that happens all the time, the issue is whether it is actionable. Here, as I read the decision, it was vagueness that got them in constitutional trouble.


    I'm not sure what that means, but read the decision that then tell me whether you would say the same thing. I try really hard not to be a result-based criticizer. (admittedly, it is difficult). I don't like the result here, either, but you are talking about a content based prohibition of Constitutionally protected speech -- which largely receives the strictest scrutiny. The Texas legislature will tighten it up and the Court will be satisfied with it. I would hope that everybody here would be pleased that we still talk about the constitutional rights of the accused.
    I don't really have an agenda here and I'm not a lawyer so I'm wasn't trying to mince words.

    Simply put, If I'm reading the decision correctly, the court is saying that it's okay to post nudes of your ex lovers. My thoughts were not on the dude who posted the photos and his rights because people do things until they're told they can't. It's human nature.

    I'm saying that I'm not surprised because it happened in a Texas court. The State doesn't seem to value women all that much, imo, but that's neither here nor there when it comes to the law.....I guess. But the law is also interpretation so if you're anti X it's easy to come up with an argument to support your position.

    I also noted that the decision will result in a better law which I think you determined as well. Of course trying to figure out what a lawyer is saying can be dangerous. hahahaha
    Last edited by Trish; 04-23-2018 at 08:45 AM.
    I'm selfish, impatient and a little insecure. I make mistakes, I am out of control and at times hard to handle. But if you can't handle me at my worst, then you sure as hell don't deserve me at my best.
    Marilyn Monroe

  2. #12

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 46,882, Level: 52
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 168
    Overall activity: 45.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    164702
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    12,039
    Points
    46,882
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    4,499
    Thanked 9,964x in 5,749 Posts
    Mentioned
    367 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Standing Wolf View Post
    I agree that it is the vague nature of the law that - as often happens - ultimately doomed its being upheld. I also believe that some distinction needs to be made between images that are obtained without the subject's knowledge or consent and those for which someone posed.
    I agree SW, but how do you protect Slick Willy in East Wherever who views this stuff from violating this law while not knowing whether it is or isn't consensual content?
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  3. #13

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 46,882, Level: 52
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 168
    Overall activity: 45.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    164702
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    12,039
    Points
    46,882
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    4,499
    Thanked 9,964x in 5,749 Posts
    Mentioned
    367 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Trish View Post
    I don't really have an agenda here and I'm not a lawyer so I'm wasn't trying to mince words. Simply put, If I'm reading the decision correctly, the court is saying that it's okay to post nudes of your ex lovers. My thoughts were not on the dude who posted the photos and his rights because people do things until they're told they can't. It's human nature.
    They'll get him in civil court.

    Quote Originally Posted by Trish View Post
    I'm saying that I'm not surprised because it happened in a Texas court. The State doesn't seem to value women all that much, imo, but that's neither here nor there when it comes to the law.....I guess. But the law is also interpretation so if you're anti X it's easy to come up with an argument to support your position.
    I haven't read a lot of Texas jurisprudence, so I can't say one way or the other. I'm all for protecting constitutional rights -- yours, mine, his.


    Quote Originally Posted by Trish View Post
    I also noted that the decision will result in a better law which I think you determined as well. Of course trying to figure out what a lawyer is saying can be dangerous. hahahaha
    Trish, I think we are on the same page here. So much of law is precedent-based. If a vague law is let to stand, then it'll be used elsewhere. I am sure the legislature will tighten this up. Nobody wants this (except the porn guys and gals) out there but it has to be in the context of the constitution. I would be jumping up and down screaming if your rights were violated as much as I would if mine were.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  4. #14
    Points: 24,892, Level: 38
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 758
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Standing Wolf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    301169
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    8,992
    Points
    24,892
    Level
    38
    Thanks Given
    1,388
    Thanked 7,272x in 4,223 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    I agree SW, but how do you protect Slick Willy in East Wherever who views this stuff from violating this law while not knowing whether it is or isn't consensual content?
    You don't criminalize the viewing or possession of such content - just its posting, and only in non-consensual circumstances. It isn't like child porn, where any reasonable person would immediately know that it was not legal. I don't think you do punish a third party, in most cases.
    "It is a foolish man who believes that he possesses all of the answers unless he is absolutely certain that he has heard all of the questions."

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Standing Wolf For This Useful Post:

    DGUtley (04-23-2018)

  6. #15
    Points: 23,422, Level: 37
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 928
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranYour first Group
    jimmyz's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    175007
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    9,191
    Points
    23,422
    Level
    37
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 4,702x in 3,284 Posts
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My kid tells me there is an app that allows you to posts and send pictures that disappear after a short time, then they're gone forever. As long as the nude image isn't downloadable by the recipient wouldn't this correct the issue of people retaining nude images for future misuse?
    " I'm old-fashioned. I like two sexes! And another thing, all of a sudden I don't like being married to what is known as a 'new woman'. I want a wife, not a competitor. Competitor! Competitor!" - Spencer Tracy in 'Adam's Rib' (1949)

    Art thou every retard among us related to thine uncle or mistress by way of moral or illegitimate rendezvous? Thus, we are one side of the other's coin by luck or pluck. - Jimmyz

  7. #16
    Points: 24,892, Level: 38
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 758
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Standing Wolf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    301169
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    8,992
    Points
    24,892
    Level
    38
    Thanks Given
    1,388
    Thanked 7,272x in 4,223 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmyz View Post
    My kid tells me there is an app that allows you to posts and send pictures that disappear after a short time, then they're gone forever. As long as the nude image isn't downloadable by the recipient wouldn't this correct the issue of people retaining nude images for future misuse?
    Snapchat?
    "It is a foolish man who believes that he possesses all of the answers unless he is absolutely certain that he has heard all of the questions."

  8. #17
    Points: 49,524, Level: 54
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 1,126
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    The Xl's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    190992
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    22,413
    Points
    49,524
    Level
    54
    Thanks Given
    4,253
    Thanked 14,187x in 8,839 Posts
    Mentioned
    406 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's a dumb idea to take pictures or let someone take pictures that you don't want to be seen.

  9. #18
    Points: 45,383, Level: 52
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 1,667
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    texan's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    30206
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    9,694
    Points
    45,383
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    1,499
    Thanked 3,096x in 2,274 Posts
    Mentioned
    116 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with the court. You let me snap a picture of you its my property. If I want to show it to someone I can. Sorry guys but this hasn't changed since forever. Just because there is social media doesn't mean anything. I could show a photo to a 100 people at a party before being online is no different. If it doesn't stay that way who then gets to become the judge of what you can show and what you cannot?

    Simply the facts dear sirs, they got it right by law..
    Blacks and poor people been voting Democrat for years and years. Hey are no better off. Vote for economics and traditions. Be part of saving America from the nutty left. The ones that highjacked this jaskassery Party.

  10. #19
    Points: 49,524, Level: 54
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 1,126
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    The Xl's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    190992
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    22,413
    Points
    49,524
    Level
    54
    Thanks Given
    4,253
    Thanked 14,187x in 8,839 Posts
    Mentioned
    406 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by texan View Post
    I agree with the court. You let me snap a picture of you its my property. If I want to show it to someone I can. Sorry guys but this hasn't changed since forever. Just because there is social media doesn't mean anything. I could show a photo to a 100 people at a party before being online is no different. If it doesn't stay that way who then gets to become the judge of what you can show and what you cannot?

    Simply the facts dear sirs, they got it right by law..
    I'm begrudgingly inclined to agree with this. The exception being if the picture was snapped without consent.

  11. #20
    Points: 96,787, Level: 75
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 563
    Overall activity: 65.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    78312
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    32,444
    Points
    96,787
    Level
    75
    Thanks Given
    4,534
    Thanked 10,277x in 7,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    Sharing nude photos of current or ex-partners protected under First Amendment, court rules. This is a shocking rule to me.
    Is distributing intimate photos of current or previous sexual partners without their consent protected by the First Amendment? A state appeals court says yes. Now it will be up to the state attorney general's office to defend the state's "revenge porn" law, which was passed in 2015 and punishes those who post intimate images from previous or current relationships online. The Tyler-based 12th Court of Appeals said the law is unconstitutional because it's too broad and infringes on free speech, The Texas Tribune reported. In his findings in the case, Chief Justice James Worthen said the First Amendment usually prohibits "content-based" restrictions. The court also said that the law was vague and infringed on the rights of third parties who might unwittingly share intimate images, according to the Associated Press. The law originated from complaints from women who said they felt violated and abused when their exes posted naked or sexual images online without their consent. One woman, Hollie Toups of Nederland, found dozens of photos of herself online and organized a class action suit against the website where they appeared.


    https://www.dallasnews.com/news/texa...venge-porn-law

    Link to the decision here: https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/t...-00346-cr.html
    If the photos were taken without the other parties consent no. But if you make a sex tape with someone it's theirs forever to do with as they wish, including post without asking you.
    Moral of the story is DON'T MAKE SEX TAPES OR let your lover of 8 weeks take nudes of you.
    If you can't remember what your partner looks like go have sex with them again instead of pics and videos. i promise it's more fun!
    The most ridiculous one i ever heard was the 14 year old who posted topless photos and was charged with ...... child porn. Hopefully the charges were dropped and mom and dad confiscated her electronics until she was 33. But she was facing being labeled a "sex offender" . How's that logic go. She is legally to young to understand the consequences of sex or any sexual act but old enough to understand the consequences of posting semi nude pics of herself without a victim . Apparently she was the perp AND the victim.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO