Did Mueller Indict a Company That Didn't Exist ??

[hanger4]

U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked Eric Dubelier, one of two lawyers representing the accused Russian company, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, if he was representing a third company listed in Mueller's indictment."What about Concord Catering?" Harvey asked Dubelier. "The government makes an allegation that there's some association. I don't mean for you to – do you represent them, or not, today? And are we arraigning them as well?""We're not," Dubelier responded. "And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we're dealing with a situation of the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich.""That company didn't exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the government," Dubelier continued. "If at some later time they show me that it did exist, we would probably represent them. But for purposes of today, no, we do not." ...................... https://www.dailywire.com/news/30556...-ryan-saavedra .................... Surely there's reasonable explanation.

[Peter1469]

The judge seems to be skeptical of Mueller's antics.

[hanger4]

The judge seems to be skeptical of Mueller's antics.

That's two Judges now.

[stjames1_53]

At least the honest judges will step on him. Indicting a company that doesn't exist, I'd almost say that it is typical politics for Mueller.
"If it moves, indict!!!" His theory is an old one, toss enough crap on the wall and hope something sticks.............and he calls himself an investigator.
I really think it's time to investigate Mueller.

[Captdon]

"Ham sandwich" describes this whole thing.

[MMC]

U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked Eric Dubelier, one of two lawyers representing the accused Russian company, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, if he was representing a third company listed in Mueller's indictment."What about Concord Catering?" Harvey asked Dubelier. "The government makes an allegation that there's some association. I don't mean for you to – do you represent them, or not, today? And are we arraigning them as well?""We're not," Dubelier responded. "And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we're dealing with a situation of the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich.""That company didn't exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the government," Dubelier continued. "If at some later time they show me that it did exist, we would probably represent them. But for purposes of today, no, we do not." ...................... https://www.dailywire.com/news/30556...-ryan-saavedra .................... Surely there's reasonable explanation.

Yep.....Mueller relies on the Clinton Cult members he has to do all the research and legwork.