User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Motorcycle on driveway can't be searched without a warrant, Supreme Court rules

  1. #11

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 43,154, Level: 50
    Level completed: 77%, Points required for next Level: 396
    Overall activity: 99.5%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    164154
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    11,351
    Points
    43,154
    Level
    50
    Thanks Given
    4,308
    Thanked 9,416x in 5,431 Posts
    Mentioned
    356 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Just for clarification what right is being protected?
    The 4th Amendment.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  2. #12
    Points: 90,640, Level: 73
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 1,610
    Overall activity: 84.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    282270
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    44,467
    Points
    90,640
    Level
    73
    Thanks Given
    31,726
    Thanked 13,631x in 10,585 Posts
    Mentioned
    183 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    The 4th Amendment.
    So not a right to privacy.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

  3. #13
    Points: 22,384, Level: 36
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 766
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    spunkloaf's Avatar Post Review / PM Disabled
    Karma
    7974
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,305
    Points
    22,384
    Level
    36
    Thanks Given
    904
    Thanked 784x in 590 Posts
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    So not a right to privacy.
    Well, the right to privacy is implied.

    The right to breathe is something that is not a constitutionally protected right, either. But it is implied through common sense.

  4. #14

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 43,154, Level: 50
    Level completed: 77%, Points required for next Level: 396
    Overall activity: 99.5%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    164154
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    11,351
    Points
    43,154
    Level
    50
    Thanks Given
    4,308
    Thanked 9,416x in 5,431 Posts
    Mentioned
    356 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    So not a right to privacy.
    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
    and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
    violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
    supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
    to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    I think that the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure is a personal privacy right but your point is well taken. So, no, not a privacy right in the sense that most people think of it. I misspoke.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-07-2018)

  6. #15
    Points: 90,640, Level: 73
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 1,610
    Overall activity: 84.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    282270
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    44,467
    Points
    90,640
    Level
    73
    Thanks Given
    31,726
    Thanked 13,631x in 10,585 Posts
    Mentioned
    183 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spunkloaf View Post
    Well, the right to privacy is implied.

    The right to breathe is something that is not a constitutionally protected right, either. But it is implied through common sense.
    We have a right to be secure. We have a right to life and it cannot be taken from us by the state without due process.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

  7. #16
    Points: 90,640, Level: 73
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 1,610
    Overall activity: 84.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    282270
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    44,467
    Points
    90,640
    Level
    73
    Thanks Given
    31,726
    Thanked 13,631x in 10,585 Posts
    Mentioned
    183 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
    and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
    violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
    supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
    to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    I think that the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure is a personal privacy right but your point is well taken. So, no, not a privacy right in the sense that most people think of it. I misspoke.
    You did not misspeak. Safety did.

    We have a right to be secure. In my opinion the right to be secure is far more important than a right to privacy. When we so easily conflate the two I fear we may end up with the lesser right to privacy while losing the essential right to be secure.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    DGUtley (06-07-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO