User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Motorcycle on driveway can't be searched without a warrant, Supreme Court rules

  1. #11

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 36,627, Level: 46
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 323
    Overall activity: 99.2%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    163183
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    10,332
    Points
    36,627
    Level
    46
    Thanks Given
    3,995
    Thanked 8,445x in 4,908 Posts
    Mentioned
    341 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Just for clarification what right is being protected?
    The 4th Amendment.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  2. #12
    Points: 85,908, Level: 71
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 1,342
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    281144
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    42,329
    Points
    85,908
    Level
    71
    Thanks Given
    30,221
    Thanked 12,505x in 9,768 Posts
    Mentioned
    176 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    The 4th Amendment.
    So not a right to privacy.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

  3. #13
    Points: 21,059, Level: 35
    Level completed: 26%, Points required for next Level: 891
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    spunkloaf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7929
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    St. Cloud, MN
    Posts
    3,866
    Points
    21,059
    Level
    35
    Thanks Given
    791
    Thanked 739x in 551 Posts
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    So not a right to privacy.
    Well, the right to privacy is implied.

    The right to breathe is something that is not a constitutionally protected right, either. But it is implied through common sense.
    Faith can move mountains, but don't forget to bring your shovel.

  4. #14

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 36,627, Level: 46
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 323
    Overall activity: 99.2%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    163183
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    10,332
    Points
    36,627
    Level
    46
    Thanks Given
    3,995
    Thanked 8,445x in 4,908 Posts
    Mentioned
    341 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    So not a right to privacy.
    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
    and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
    violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
    supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
    to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    I think that the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure is a personal privacy right but your point is well taken. So, no, not a privacy right in the sense that most people think of it. I misspoke.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-07-2018)

  6. #15
    Points: 85,908, Level: 71
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 1,342
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    281144
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    42,329
    Points
    85,908
    Level
    71
    Thanks Given
    30,221
    Thanked 12,505x in 9,768 Posts
    Mentioned
    176 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spunkloaf View Post
    Well, the right to privacy is implied.

    The right to breathe is something that is not a constitutionally protected right, either. But it is implied through common sense.
    We have a right to be secure. We have a right to life and it cannot be taken from us by the state without due process.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

  7. #16
    Points: 85,908, Level: 71
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 1,342
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    281144
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    42,329
    Points
    85,908
    Level
    71
    Thanks Given
    30,221
    Thanked 12,505x in 9,768 Posts
    Mentioned
    176 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
    and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
    violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
    supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
    to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    I think that the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure is a personal privacy right but your point is well taken. So, no, not a privacy right in the sense that most people think of it. I misspoke.
    You did not misspeak. Safety did.

    We have a right to be secure. In my opinion the right to be secure is far more important than a right to privacy. When we so easily conflate the two I fear we may end up with the lesser right to privacy while losing the essential right to be secure.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    DGUtley (06-07-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO