User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 70

Thread: Sheriff defends using state's prison food money to buy beach house

  1. #1
    Points: 22,442, Level: 36
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 708
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    spunkloaf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7997
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,436
    Points
    22,442
    Level
    36
    Thanks Given
    946
    Thanked 807x in 609 Posts
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Sheriff defends using state's prison food money to buy beach house

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alabama...t-beach-house/

    GADSDEN, Ala. -- An Alabama sheriff legally used more than $750,000 of funds meant to feed inmates to purchase a beach house. Etowah County Sheriff Todd Entrekin told The Birmingham News he follows a state law passed before World War II that allows sheriffs to keep "excess" inmate-feeding funds for themselves.Entrekin reported on state ethics forms that he made "more than $250,000" each of the past three years through the funds.The sheriff's annual salary is more than $93,000. He and his wife purchased a four-bedroom house with an in-ground pool and canal access in September for $740,000.Entrekin got a $592,000 mortgage. The home is one of several properties with a total assessed value of more than $1.7 million that the couple own together or separately.In a statement to NPR, Entrekin said the "liberal media has began attacking me for following the letter of the law."
    I just love that. "The liberal media has began attacking me for following the letter of the law." I don't understand why whenever somebody gets caught doing something shady, they attack liberals and the MSM. Are we just the scapegoat for everything? I wonder, whatever happened to personal accountability?
    Faith can move mountains, but don't forget to bring your shovel.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to spunkloaf For This Useful Post:

    Crepitus (06-07-2018),DGUtley (06-07-2018),Dr. Who (06-06-2018),Just AnotherPerson (06-06-2018)

  3. #2
    Points: 47,400, Level: 53
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 1,450
    Overall activity: 58.0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience PointsVeteranTagger First Class
    roadmaster's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7041
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    12,564
    Points
    47,400
    Level
    53
    Thanks Given
    2,068
    Thanked 3,183x in 2,462 Posts
    Mentioned
    134 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I read about this about 4 or 5 months ago. They need to cover this loophole that allows this. But he or she is right the liberal media wouldn't go after their own for the same thing.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to roadmaster For This Useful Post:

    KathyS (06-06-2018)

  5. #3

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 295,974, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.3%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    327960
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    52,380
    Points
    295,974
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    2,989
    Thanked 7,162x in 4,497 Posts
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If its proven he did that he deserves jail time, I cant imagine theres a law that allows a sheriff to keep taxpayer funds for themselves.
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.

    GROUCHO MARX,

  6. #4
    Points: 111,525, Level: 81
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 2,125
    Overall activity: 83.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    286163
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    53,338
    Points
    111,525
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    39,047
    Thanked 17,525x in 13,599 Posts
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    If its proven he did that he deserves jail time, I cant imagine theres a law that allows a sheriff to keep taxpayer funds for themselves.
    The sheriff is right. He is unethical but within what the law allows.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

    The Wall: If we build it, they will not come.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    roadmaster (06-06-2018)

  8. #5
    Points: 47,400, Level: 53
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 1,450
    Overall activity: 58.0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience PointsVeteranTagger First Class
    roadmaster's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7041
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    12,564
    Points
    47,400
    Level
    53
    Thanks Given
    2,068
    Thanked 3,183x in 2,462 Posts
    Mentioned
    134 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    The sheriff is right. He is unethical but within what the law allows.
    Correct

  9. #6
    Points: 22,442, Level: 36
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 708
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    spunkloaf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7997
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,436
    Points
    22,442
    Level
    36
    Thanks Given
    946
    Thanked 807x in 609 Posts
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    If its proven he did that he deserves jail time, I cant imagine theres a law that allows a sheriff to keep taxpayer funds for themselves.
    So, I read more into this. Apparently, the law goes like this...the sheriff IS allowed to keep the money, but is also responsible for covering fund shortages if the fixed allotment doesn't cover food costs from one year to the next.

    This creates a whole bunch of questions, though.

    Since the sheriff is in charge of their nutrition AND is allowed to integrate prisoners' nutrition funds into his personal finances, doesn't that create a conflict of interest? What is to stop the sheriff from doing exactly what he has done in this story? He fed the inmates two corn dogs per day, and pocketed the rest of the money. What kind of regulation is there to stop this from happening?
    Faith can move mountains, but don't forget to bring your shovel.

  10. #7
    Points: 22,442, Level: 36
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 708
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    spunkloaf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7997
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,436
    Points
    22,442
    Level
    36
    Thanks Given
    946
    Thanked 807x in 609 Posts
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by roadmaster View Post
    I read about this about 4 or 5 months ago. They need to cover this loophole that allows this. But he or she is right the liberal media wouldn't go after their own for the same thing.
    What do you mean "their own?" You mean, there aren't any liberal sheriffs?
    Faith can move mountains, but don't forget to bring your shovel.

  11. #8
    Points: 111,525, Level: 81
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 2,125
    Overall activity: 83.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    286163
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    53,338
    Points
    111,525
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    39,047
    Thanked 17,525x in 13,599 Posts
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spunkloaf View Post
    So, I read more into this. Apparently, the law goes like this...the sheriff IS allowed to keep the money, but is also responsible for covering fund shortages if the fixed allotment doesn't cover food costs from one year to the next.

    This creates a whole bunch of questions, though.

    Since the sheriff is in charge of their nutrition AND is allowed to integrate prisoners' nutrition funds into his personal finances, doesn't that create a conflict of interest? What is to stop the sheriff from doing exactly what he has done in this story? He fed the inmates two corn dogs per day, and pocketed the rest of the money. What kind of regulation is there to stop this from happening?
    The solution is a better law.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.

    The Wall: If we build it, they will not come.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    spunkloaf (06-06-2018)

  13. #9
    Points: 104,950, Level: 78
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 300
    Overall activity: 61.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    79378
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,410
    Points
    104,950
    Level
    78
    Thanks Given
    5,259
    Thanked 11,343x in 8,551 Posts
    Mentioned
    225 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spunkloaf View Post
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alabama...t-beach-house/



    I just love that. "The liberal media has began attacking me for following the letter of the law." I don't understand why whenever somebody gets caught doing something shady, they attack liberals and the MSM. Are we just the scapegoat for everything? I wonder, whatever happened to personal accountability?
    There has to be something they can charge him with. And not just him, this happened in 2009 and nobody changed the law? Heads need to roll.
    Last edited by donttread; 06-06-2018 at 05:44 PM.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to donttread For This Useful Post:

    KathyS (06-06-2018)

  15. #10
    Points: 22,442, Level: 36
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 708
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    Social10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    spunkloaf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7997
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,436
    Points
    22,442
    Level
    36
    Thanks Given
    946
    Thanked 807x in 609 Posts
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    The sheriff is right. He is unethical but within what the law allows.
    And this is why we love our liberal mainstream media. It exposes corrupt unethical people, even if they are technically following the law. Laws are made for a reason, and it is obvious that this particular law was not very carefully crafted.
    Faith can move mountains, but don't forget to bring your shovel.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO