User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: US Navy ship-building

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,082, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497384
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,714
    Points
    863,082
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,633
    Thanked 148,394x in 94,879 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    US Navy ship-building

    US Navy ship-building

    With its increased budget, the US Navy is going to contract for several new vessels. We are going to commission 3 Littoral Class Combat Ships, three Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyers, two Virginia class attack submarines, and two John Lewis class fleet oilers and an Expeditionary Sea Base and a fleet tug. Additionally, plans our in the works for a new Ford Class aircraft carrier. And guess what its name will be! The Enterprise. CVN-80.

    KTF

    The House Appropriations Committee’s defense funding bill for Fiscal Year 2019 would buy a dozen new warships for the Navy, including two Littoral Combat Ships beyond the service’s request, according to the text of the bill that was released on Wednesday.

    The $22.7-billion shipbuilding account includes three LCSs, three Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers (DDG-51), two Virginia-class attack submarines (SSN-774), two John Lewis-class fleet oilers, an Expeditionary Sea Base and a fleet tug.


    Absent from the bill is money to accelerate the procurement of a Ford-class aircraft carrier (CVN-78), which the House Armed Service Committee’s National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2019 supported doing. The Navy has proposed buying the planned Enterprise (CVN-80) and the yet-unnamed CVN-81 in a two-carrier contract to achieve some savings, and HASC further supported this by allowing the Navy to bump CVN-81 procurement up to FY 2019 to create additional workforce efficiencies by having the ships centered closer together.


    The defense spending bill also sides with the HASC and opposes SASC and the Navy when it comes to LCS. Navy leaders have been split on the need for additional LCS buys to maintain the shipbuilding industrial base ahead of the transition to the next-generation FFG(X) guided-missile frigate. The Navy plans to buy 20 frigates from one of five companies competing for the program – including both current LCS builders.
    Rendering of the third ship in the Ford class of aircraft carriers, Enterprise (CVN-80).

    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MMC (06-09-2018),NapRover (06-09-2018)

  3. #2

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 478,760, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 63.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    201315
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    53,397
    Points
    478,760
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,185
    Thanked 46,585x in 25,141 Posts
    Mentioned
    892 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Navy's New Frigate Revealed

    Well, sort of. The Pentagon's new RFP doesn't provide a whole lot of detail on what the Navy wants.

    Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning" ... of the U.S. Navy's search for a new frigate warship. (With apologies to Winston Churchill.)

    Last week, at long last, the U.S. Navy issued its official Request for Proposals (RFP) from defense contractors interested in building it a new frigate. Smaller than a destroyer but larger than a coastal patrol vessel, the Navy is seeking a warship more robust than its much-maligned Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) to fill out its requirement for 52 "small surface combatants" in the fleet.



    Despite the time that's passed already, the 77 pages (mostly restating the rules of government contracting) contained in this RFP only actually sketch out a few key requirements for the vessel, hereafter known as "FFG(X)":

    Timeline, cost, and bidders

    The Navy's RFP doesn't even contain much in the way of a timeline, other than mentioning that construction should begin by 2020. Fortunately, just a couple days after the RFP came out, the Congressional Research Service published a report filling in a few more details that should interest investors.


    Production of the first frigate, as the RFP stated, is to begin in 2020, followed by a second in 2021. Construction should then continue through 2030 at the rate of two ships per year, until the Navy receives a full complement of 20 warships......snip~


    https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/...-revealed.aspx


    Word is we are looking at the Italians Frigate, and the ships would be built in Wisconsin.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (06-09-2018)

  6. #4
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We need to get to a 355 ship Navy. ASAP.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  7. #5
    Points: 11,001, Level: 25
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 749
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    NapRover's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    15049
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,294
    Points
    11,001
    Level
    25
    Thanks Given
    2,354
    Thanked 1,636x in 1,083 Posts
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm all for building up--but doesn't it seem like our adversaries are spending a lot on aircraft carrier defense/destruction? How safe are our carriers and destroyers, etc.?

  8. #6
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NapRover View Post
    I'm all for building up--but doesn't it seem like our adversaries are spending a lot on aircraft carrier defense/destruction? How safe are our carriers and destroyers, etc.?

    How vulnerable are the US aircraft carriers and battle ...

    https://www.quora.com/How-vulnerable-are-the-US-aircraft-carriers...
    A United States aircraft carrier group is one of the most secure entities on the planet. What I feel is most misunderstood is that carriers never travel alone. There are numerous ships always traveling around a carrier to ensure its safety against a …



    Five Reasons U.S. Aircraft Carriers Are Nearly Impossible ...

    nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/five-reasons-us-aircraft...
    Large-deck, nuclear-powered aircraft carriers are the signature expression of American military power. No other combat system available to U.S. warfighters comes close to delivering so much offensive punch for months at a time without requiring land bases near the action. As a result, the ...
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (06-09-2018)

  10. #7
    Points: 265,397, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307981
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,752
    Points
    265,397
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,851
    Thanked 39,355x in 27,929 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post

    How vulnerable are the US aircraft carriers and battle ...

    https://www.quora.com/How-vulnerable-are-the-US-aircraft-carriers...
    A United States aircraft carrier group is one of the most secure entities on the planet. What I feel is most misunderstood is that carriers never travel alone. There are numerous ships always traveling around a carrier to ensure its safety against a …



    Five Reasons U.S. Aircraft Carriers Are Nearly Impossible ...

    nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/five-reasons-us-aircraft...
    Large-deck, nuclear-powered aircraft carriers are the signature expression of American military power. No other combat system available to U.S. warfighters comes close to delivering so much offensive punch for months at a time without requiring land bases near the action. As a result, the ...
    I predict space based surveillance and hypervelocity cruise missiles and ballistic missiles will achieve kinetic kills.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    MMC (06-10-2018)

  12. #8
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    I predict space based surveillance and hypervelocity cruise missiles and ballistic missiles will achieve kinetic kills.
    What should the US do.....to counter such measures?
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  13. #9
    Points: 265,397, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307981
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,752
    Points
    265,397
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,851
    Thanked 39,355x in 27,929 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    What should the US do.....to counter such measures?
    Go underwater. Improve stealth characteristics. Develop active countermeasures for every link in the enemy's kill chain.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  14. #10
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Go underwater. Improve stealth characteristics. Develop active countermeasures for every link in the enemy's kill chain.
    I think we are looking at Lasers, and what about the rail gun? Also Drones?
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts