User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: West Point grad who posted pro-communist photos gets other-than-honorable discharge..

  1. #21

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 74,603, Level: 66
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 847
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    195787
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    32,429
    Points
    74,603
    Level
    66
    Thanks Given
    3,713
    Thanked 27,472x in 15,895 Posts
    Mentioned
    412 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Right, so if he was gesticulating before images of Trump and the GOP, he would have been equally turfed.
    That sounds like something Crepitus might have written.

    Maybe you should actually read an article before commenting on it.

    "Rapone said an investigation revealed he had been advocating online for a socialist revolution and had disparaged high-ranking officers and U.S. officials. His resignation followed a reprimand that said he had exhibited "conduct unbecoming of an officer."
    “Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.” - Barry Goldwater

  2. #22
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,022, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497371
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,693
    Points
    863,022
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,627
    Thanked 148,381x in 94,871 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    Must have had a change of heart. It sounds like he has the courage of his conviction. I can certainly see how Afghanistan may have effected him. However his online life is not compatible with his Military life so a repremand should not have been a shock to him. The Army can't have officers advocating revolution .
    As for payimng back the cost of hos education? C'mon , unless it's a specific condition of attending known to all CaADETS
    Cadets of the Service Academies commit to 5 years of active duty, if they don't complete it they are subject to paying for the cost of their education. Waivers can be granted in a case by case basis.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Cannons Front (06-21-2018),MMC (06-21-2018)

  4. #23
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,022, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497371
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,693
    Points
    863,022
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,627
    Thanked 148,381x in 94,871 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    That sounds like something Crepitus might have written.

    Maybe you should actually read an article before commenting on it.

    "Rapone said an investigation revealed he had been advocating online for a socialist revolution and had disparaged high-ranking officers and U.S. officials. His resignation followed a reprimand that said he had exhibited "conduct unbecoming of an officer."
    Advocating for the overthrow of the US government violates his oath of office and he could have been court martialed rather than administratively discharged.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MMC (06-21-2018)

  6. #24
    Points: 175,337, Level: 99
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 2,313
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    Dr. Who's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    870783
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Gallifrey
    Posts
    69,330
    Points
    175,337
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    12,929
    Thanked 13,046x in 8,894 Posts
    Mentioned
    207 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    That sounds like something Crepitus might have written.

    Maybe you should actually read an article before commenting on it.

    "Rapone said an investigation revealed he had been advocating online for a socialist revolution and had disparaged high-ranking officers and U.S. officials. His resignation followed a reprimand that said he had exhibited "conduct unbecoming of an officer."
    So what? Socialism is simply a political preference. A socialist revolution is not necessarily violent. Socialism is not a crime. Now disparaging high-ranking officers could be an issue in the military. Furthermore, I was responding to those who were jumping on the communism aspect as if this was the late 40's and early 50's.
    In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.



    "The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
    Mahatma Gandhi

  7. #25
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,022, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497371
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,693
    Points
    863,022
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,627
    Thanked 148,381x in 94,871 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    So what? Socialism is simply a political preference. A socialist revolution is not necessarily violent. Socialism is not a crime. Now disparaging high-ranking officers could be an issue in the military. Furthermore, I was responding to those who were jumping on the communism aspect as if this was the late 40's and early 50's.
    Advocating for a revolution in the US even nonviolent is not legal for military officers.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-20-2018),MMC (06-21-2018)

  9. #26
    Points: 175,337, Level: 99
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 2,313
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    Dr. Who's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    870783
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Gallifrey
    Posts
    69,330
    Points
    175,337
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    12,929
    Thanked 13,046x in 8,894 Posts
    Mentioned
    207 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Advocating for a revolution in the US even nonviolent is not legal for military officers.
    I suspect that the definition of revolution is dependent on the political bias of the military. If any officer was suggesting a constitutional revolution he would probably be promoted.
    In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.



    "The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
    Mahatma Gandhi

  10. #27
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,022, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497371
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,693
    Points
    863,022
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,627
    Thanked 148,381x in 94,871 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    I suspect that the definition of revolution is dependent on the political bias of the military. If any officer was suggesting a constitutional revolution he would probably be promoted.
    Only if the officer's side won.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-20-2018),MMC (06-21-2018)

  12. #28
    Points: 175,337, Level: 99
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 2,313
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    Dr. Who's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    870783
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Gallifrey
    Posts
    69,330
    Points
    175,337
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    12,929
    Thanked 13,046x in 8,894 Posts
    Mentioned
    207 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Only if the officer's side won.
    Which actually means that this is purely political.
    In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.



    "The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
    Mahatma Gandhi

  13. #29

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 74,603, Level: 66
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 847
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    195787
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    32,429
    Points
    74,603
    Level
    66
    Thanks Given
    3,713
    Thanked 27,472x in 15,895 Posts
    Mentioned
    412 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Which actually means that this is purely political.
    No, it isn't.

    The idiot violated a code. He spoke disparagingly of his superiors in a public forum. He advocated revolution. His little stunt with the sign in his hat proved he lacked judgment. He did not behave in a manner befitting an officer in the US Army and a graduate of the USMA.

    He proved himself unfit.
    “Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.” - Barry Goldwater

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cletus For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-20-2018),Peter1469 (06-20-2018)

  15. #30
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,022, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497371
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,693
    Points
    863,022
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,627
    Thanked 148,381x in 94,871 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Which actually means that this is purely political.
    Not true. No officer can advocate for a rebellion against our civilian government / the Constitution. It is not legal for them to do so. But if they won, like our Founders did, well you get the picture.

    This guy was poison in the ranks. Other officers hated him. The enlisted likely all hated him as well.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-20-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts