This is your claim. You are talking about the burden of proof being on the prosecutor.
This is me agreeing with your claim, even taking it a step further by showing how much leeway is given the pros because they have a burden of proof to overcone
This is where you lost your reading comp ability, because you are attempting to argue something we already agreed upon.
This is me questioning your cognitive ability between your last post and my reply.
Here you are again acting confused.