User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 61 to 68 of 68

Thread: West Virginia Supreme Court justice indicted

  1. #61
    Points: 122,776, Level: 84
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 74
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2616415
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    50,789
    Points
    122,776
    Level
    84
    Thanks Given
    25,014
    Thanked 22,901x in 15,599 Posts
    Mentioned
    1237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Th onus is on the prosecutor, not the defendant. I am delighted you know more about safety than about justice.
    This is your claim. You are talking about the burden of proof being on the prosecutor.

    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    Sure it is, which is why they are the first to speak and the last to speak. The burden of proof falls on their shoulder.
    This is me agreeing with your claim, even taking it a step further by showing how much leeway is given the pros because they have a burden of proof to overcone


    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Your language is imprecise. The government must prove its case. An indictment does not mean the defendant is guilty.

    Try harder.
    This is where you lost your reading comp ability, because you are attempting to argue something we already agreed upon.

    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    No, you need to comprehend better. Maybe the problem is that I'm using words that are too difficult for you to understand, do you know what burden of proof means?
    This is me questioning your cognitive ability between your last post and my reply.

    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Yes. But when you use a word like "they" who besides you knows who you mean by it.

    Did no one ever teach you the burden of proof is on the prosecutor, not the defendant?
    Here you are again acting confused.
    “Conscientiously believing that the proper condition of the negro is slavery, or a complete subjection to the white man, and entertaining the belief that the day is not distant when the old Union will be restored with slavery nationally declared to be the proper condition of all of African descent, and in view of the future harmony and progress of all the States of America, I have been induced to issue this address, so that there may be no misunderstanding in the future”

    - Jefferson Davis

  2. #62
    Original Ranter
    Points: 858,837, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 92.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496507
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,624
    Points
    858,837
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,194
    Thanked 147,517x in 94,378 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    Sooo, what's the difference in this person being indicted and the responses are pretty much a consensus on it being apropos, and someone else getting indicted and it being a soft coup?
    I am not sure indictments are what the intellectual right who first wrote about a soft coup were referring to. That came long after the recognition that there was a soft coup to remove a president elected according to our Constitution. The indictments are very recent in the soft coup's actions.

    They likely know their indictments will be ineffectual- they all do not directly relate to Trump. What they want the the MSM to flood the news marketplace so hard that public opinion turns against the president.

    The MSM has done that, but Trump has better approval ratings than Obama at the same point in their office. And the public's view of the MSM is very low. Perhaps the lowest ever.


    I don't call that a mission success.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (08-09-2018)

  4. #63
    Points: 172,886, Level: 98
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 764
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88542
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    51,897
    Points
    172,886
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,283
    Thanked 20,510x in 14,774 Posts
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    He is going to get a lot of jail time.
    I get that he should lose hos job , be held accountable and be held to a high standard. But 395 years for padding the expense account, albeit in an incredibly stupid way, seems just a bit much

  5. #64
    Points: 5,437, Level: 17
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 313
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second ClassVeteran5000 Experience Points
    Major Lambda's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    276
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    West - South West of Washington DC
    Posts
    395
    Points
    5,437
    Level
    17
    Thanks Given
    306
    Thanked 266x in 188 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It ain't over till its over.



    "The West Virginia House Judiciary Committee voted on Tuesday to impeach all four members of its state Supreme Court."


    "The panel approved 14 article of impeachment against the sitting justices, according to the Charleston Gazette-Mail, which moves forward the possibility of impeachment for the entirety of the Supreme Court in that state."

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...-supreme-court





    Major Lambda
    Ab Extra & Sui Generis

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Major Lambda For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (08-09-2018),Peter1469 (08-09-2018)

  7. #65
    Points: 172,886, Level: 98
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 764
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88542
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    51,897
    Points
    172,886
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,283
    Thanked 20,510x in 14,774 Posts
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    I get that he should lose hos job , be held accountable and be held to a high standard. But 395 years for padding the expense account, albeit in an incredibly stupid way, seems just a bit much

    This guy pissed somebody off

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to donttread For This Useful Post:

    Major Lambda (08-09-2018)

  9. #66
    Points: 5,437, Level: 17
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 313
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second ClassVeteran5000 Experience Points
    Major Lambda's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    276
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    West - South West of Washington DC
    Posts
    395
    Points
    5,437
    Level
    17
    Thanks Given
    306
    Thanked 266x in 188 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    This guy pissed somebody off

    A TV Station out of Huntington , WV started the investigation . One of their investigative reporters started the ball rolling. I wonder who put the investigative reporter on to the State Supreme Court.

    I agree. Loughry pissed someone severely off.





    Major Lambda
    Ab Extra & Sui Generis

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Major Lambda For This Useful Post:

    donttread (08-09-2018)

  11. #67
    Points: 80,676, Level: 69
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 1,774
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    countryboy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    28213
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    28,642
    Points
    80,676
    Level
    69
    Thanks Given
    10,466
    Thanked 21,450x in 13,505 Posts
    Mentioned
    230 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    Sooo, what's the difference in this person being indicted and the responses are pretty much a consensus on it being apropos, and someone else getting indicted and it being a soft coup?
    In this case, there appears to be actual evidence of crimes committed. Is this a serious question, or a lame attempt at satire? Don't quit your day job there Seinfeld.
    Cutesy Time is OVER

  12. #68
    Points: 84,367, Level: 70
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 483
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    roadmaster's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10157
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    18,760
    Points
    84,367
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    3,287
    Thanked 6,300x in 4,607 Posts
    Mentioned
    143 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    West Virginia’s House of Delegates has impeached all 4 state Supreme Court justices over spending and office renovations - AP

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to roadmaster For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (08-14-2018)

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts