Captdon (07-16-2018)
jet57 (07-16-2018)
Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler
Chris (07-16-2018)
Your premise is obviously biologically false, as an unfertilized egg is indusputably human life. Yet you have no problem with butchering such helpless haploid humans.
Thus, you are a murderer.
This is the heart of the issue. You're just making up loopy revisionist definitions of what a person is, and then shrieking that anyone else who doesn't embrace those definitions is a murderer. In the eyes of the sane and moral people, you're no different than PETA freaks.
Sadly for you, nobody else is obligated to pay any attention to your "BECAUSE I SAY SO!" rants. A woman's body does not belong to you, your church, or your precious, precious authoritarian state, and you'll just have to get over that.
Ah, my little trolling friend, where've you been?
It is true that an unfertilized human egg is a part of human life just as my big toe is. No one has disputed that.
But neither is a unique living human being. A fertilized human egg is. That is the heart of the issue. And the biology you fail to fathom.
Person? My argument is about what a human being is, biologically. It's the left that argues abstractly about what a person is.
For the rest of your trolling, I choose to ignore it.
Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler
You have a tell. Whenever you can't respond sensibly, you declare someone is a troll. Thus, your opponent knows they should keep attacking from the same direction.
It is true that an unfertilized human egg is a part of human life just as my big toe is. No one has disputed that.
But neither is a unique living human being. A fertilized human egg is.
And you're back to "BECAUSE I SAY SO!", same as the PETA freaks. Like I said, I don't pay attention to them either.
That is the heart of the issue. And the biology you fail to fathom.
Biology is very unkind to pro-life fantasies.
And that's where you fail. "Human being" has _never_ been a biological definition. Trying to make it one is some very historically recent pro-life revisionism. "Human being" and "person" always have been and still are social, legal and historical definitions.Person? My argument is about what a human being is, biologically. It's the left that argues abstractly about what a person is.
What's more, you can't even state what your biological definition supposedly is, without going circular or just defining yourself as correct. If you disagree, give it a try. Without simply defining yourself as correct or going circular, tell us what the precise biological definition of "human being" is. Be sure to define all your terms exactly.
It would be like trying on someone's dirty underwear.
Liberals are a clear and present danger to our nation
Pick your enemies carefully.
There's no respinding to a troll is why.You have a tell. Whenever you can't respond sensibly, you declare someone is a troll.
In fact, you don't seem to have any reasonble response to the biological facts--like a fertilized egg being a unique living being, human beings being a evolutionary biological classification--I've presented other than to troll with more BS.
hu·man be·ing
noun
a man, woman, or child of the species Homo sapiens, distinguished from other animals by superior mental development, power of articulate speech, and upright stance.
Happy trolling.
Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler