CNN Finds A New Target

[Robo]

CNN adds another page to their leftist partisan vigilante search to bring down another Republican foe who sits on the House committee investigating the FBI, Justice Department's efforts to exonerate Hillary Clinton from her felonious handlings of the government's classified information and the department's and FBI's attempts to frame Donald Trump to keep him from being President and their ongoing attempts likewise since his election. Their target now is Congressman Jim Jordan, Ohio. Jordan being a member of the House committee and an ardent tough interviewer of the likes of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and other FBI witnesses in Jordan's attempts to get to the truth about the corruption in the Justice Department and FBI.


CNN in another hair on fire attempt to bring Jordan down is accusing him of covering up a sexual scandal involving a team doctor and members of the University of Ohio's wrestling team, where the alleged homosexual doctor was allegedly molesting the team's wrestlers while Jordan was an assistant coach of the wrestling team at the university. A half dozen questionable witnesses have come forward and one in particular has been all over CNN testifying that Jordan knew about the abuse and did nothing about it. Seems CNN's major witness has a criminal record.


Let's get this crap straight! We're not talking about minor children here, we're talking about 19 to 24 year old raging hormonal examples of young male adults at a university being trained in wrestling a sport based in the art of "SELF DEFENCE." Maybe Jordan was just minding his own business? Maybe the ardent leftist supporters of homosexual rights at CNN should go piss up a rope and look for another "outrageous" issue to set their low-life hair on fire over, huh?

[DGUtley]

1. I have no idea what (if anything) did or didn't happen at OSU.
2. Timing is suspicious given Jordan's desire to be SOTH.
3. CNN and the lefties will go after this guy with a vengeance.

[Tahuyaman]

1. I have no idea what (if anything) did or didn't happen at OSU.
2. Timing is suspicious given Jordan's desire to be SOTH.
3. CNN and the lefties will go after this guy with a vengeance.

Yes, I suspect there’s a political motive behind these accusations.

[donttread]

1. I have no idea what (if anything) did or didn't happen at OSU.
2. Timing is suspicious given Jordan's desire to be SOTH.
3. CNN and the lefties will go after this guy with a vengeance.

Can you molest adults? They are wrestlers, kick the SIB's ass if he touches you. Problem solved

[Admiral Ackbar]

1. I have no idea what (if anything) did or didn't happen at OSU.
2. Timing is suspicious given Jordan's desire to be SOTH.
3. CNN and the lefties will go after this guy with a vengeance.

This is a Hit job.. These guys are big tough wrestlers. Real men would have punched him in the face. This why I don't buy any of this.

[IMPress Polly]

tPF has never seen a(n "accused") sexual predator they didn't reflexively love. Not even when the victims are male, so, you know, should be a more sympathetic case!

[DGUtley]

tPF has never seen a(n "accused") sexual predator they didn't reflexively love. Not even when the victims are male, so, you know, should be a more sympathetic case!

No. First of all, JJ isn't being accused of being a sexual predator, so you should apologize to me and him.

Secondly, this is a very public person. A local hero. A national politician. Why now? Are you even curious as to why now? Just a teensy tiny bit?

[IMPress Polly]

No. First of all, JJ isn't being accused of being a sexual predator, so you should apologize to me and him.

Secondly, this is a very public person. A local hero. A national politician. Why now? Are you even curious as to why now? Just a teensy tiny bit?

I was talking about the actual sexual predator, not the Freedom Caucus ally thereof. Whether directly or indirectly though, you're defending the guy.

[DGUtley]

I was talking about the actual sexual predator, not the Freedom Caucus ally thereof. Whether directly or indirectly though, you're defending the guy.

Polly, shame on you. I am neither directly nor indirectly defending the sexual predator. You should be ashamed of yourself.

[Captdon]

I was talking about the actual sexual predator, not the Freedom Caucus ally thereof. Whether directly or indirectly though, you're defending the guy.

No one was talking about the predator at all. You certainly were accusing Jordan and Dave. Lady, there's no reason for such a mentality as you have. Whatever the reason is you need to deal with it. We can't.