User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: California, long a holdout, adopts mass immigration hearings

  1. #1
    Points: 22,553, Level: 36
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 597
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cannons Front's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    13491
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,048
    Points
    22,553
    Level
    36
    Thanks Given
    2,897
    Thanked 5,150x in 2,896 Posts
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    California, long a holdout, adopts mass immigration hearings

    SAN DIEGO — A federal judge was irritated when an attorney for dozens of people charged with crossing the border illegally asked for more time to meet with clients before setting bond. It was pushing 5 p.m. on a Friday in May, and the judge in San Diego was wrestling with a surge in her caseload that resulted from the Trump administration’s “zero-tolerance” policy to prosecute everyone who enters the country illegally.“It’s been a long week,” U.S. Magistrate Judge Nita Stormes said, suggesting that the court needed more judges and public defenders.


    On Monday, the court will try to curb the caseload by assigning a judge to oversee misdemeanor immigration cases and holding large, group hearings that critics call assembly-line justice. The move puts California in line with other border states, and it captures the strain that zero tolerance has put on federal courts, particularly in the nation’s most populous state, which has long resisted mass hearings for illegal border crossing. https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/im...arings-n889691

    Maybe we should build a new courthouse with a back door that leads straight to the border........
    "The powers of the federal government are enumerated; it can only operate in certain cases; it has legislative powers on defined and limited objects, beyond which it cannot extend its jurisdiction." James Madison 1788

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cannons Front For This Useful Post:

    Common (07-09-2018),Don (07-09-2018),MisterVeritis (07-09-2018),MMC (07-09-2018),stjames1_53 (07-09-2018)

  3. #2
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There a couple things we need to do. One is tell Mexico if they don't turn off the spiket. We gonna do it for them. Then snatch 100 miles South of our border and take that $#@! from Mexico. Creating a buffer zone.


    Then we tell the UN to get off their Lazy asses build a structure on Mexicos Southern Border, man it. Then start dealing with asylum seekers. Letting them know Mexico will now be taking care of them.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We can expect the left and the ACLU to jump on the bandwagon filing suits about Assembly line Justice.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  5. #4
    Points: 264,399, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 82.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307877
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,547
    Points
    264,399
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,662
    Thanked 39,251x in 27,872 Posts
    Mentioned
    385 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    There a couple things we need to do. One is tell Mexico if they don't turn off the spiket. We gonna do it for them. Then snatch 100 miles South of our border and take that $#@! from Mexico. Creating a buffer zone.
    Hmmm. Good idea.

    http://thepoliticalforums.com/thread...-invade-Mexico
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    MMC (07-09-2018)

  7. #5
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Feds ask US-Mexico border property owners to survey their land, but many remain skeptical.....


    Some property owners along the U.S.-Mexico border in South Texas said they have received letters from the federal government asking to review their land for the border wall construction.




    Residents in the town of Escobares received notices a few weeks ago from the Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), asking for the permission to survey their land, KENS-TV reported.


    Texas Congressman Henry Cuellar, a representative in the area, said there have been over 200 of such requests made in Starr and Hidalgo counties, according to federal officials.....snip~


    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...skeptical.html



    Trump steadily working on that Wall.....nothing the Demos can do if people sell or offer up their land, huh?
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  8. #6
    Points: 6,375, Level: 19
    Level completed: 4%, Points required for next Level: 675
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveVeteran5000 Experience Points
    DLLS's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    557
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    827
    Points
    6,375
    Level
    19
    Thanks Given
    140
    Thanked 547x in 344 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Note the following does not apply to those illegals appearing in Federal District Court. It is merely an attempt to show that so-called assembly line justice is nothing new.

    "Assembly line justice"

    United States Immigration Courts whose "Judges" are not Article III judges but Administrative Law Judges have been conducting what they call "Master Calendar" hearings for years.

    It is basically an araingment (sp) where a group of around 20 respondents are in the court room. The Immigration Judge advises them of their rights. Then individually he reads the charges and determines if the respondent may be eligible for some form of relief from removal. If the person is not eligible for relief he is ordered removed. If eligible for relief the judge inquires if the person wants to apply for such relief, if not he is ordered removed. If the person wants to apply for an available form of relief the case is reset to another master calendar for the person or his attorney (the government does not supply attorneys in Immigration Court proceedings) to file the documentation. The case is then set for an individual hearing on the merits of the application.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DLLS For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (07-09-2018),MMC (07-09-2018)

  10. #7

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 152,038, Level: 93
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 2,012
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger First ClassCreated Album picturesYour first GroupRecommendation First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Adelaide's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    341325
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    N. Pole and VA
    Posts
    30,757
    Points
    152,038
    Level
    93
    Thanks Given
    4,025
    Thanked 18,449x in 11,739 Posts
    Mentioned
    1723 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Judicial efficiency is a serious issue. The expectation of a speedy trial is becoming less and less possible as dockets remain full and vacancies aren't filled and/or new positions aren't created.

  11. #8

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 152,038, Level: 93
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 2,012
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger First ClassCreated Album picturesYour first GroupRecommendation First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Adelaide's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    341325
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    N. Pole and VA
    Posts
    30,757
    Points
    152,038
    Level
    93
    Thanks Given
    4,025
    Thanked 18,449x in 11,739 Posts
    Mentioned
    1723 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DLLS View Post
    Note the following does not apply to those illegals appearing in Federal District Court. It is merely an attempt to show that so-called assembly line justice is nothing new.

    "Assembly line justice"

    United States Immigration Courts whose "Judges" are not Article III judges but Administrative Law Judges have been conducting what they call "Master Calendar" hearings for years.

    It is basically an araingment (sp) where a group of around 20 respondents are in the court room. The Immigration Judge advises them of their rights. Then individually he reads the charges and determines if the respondent may be eligible for some form of relief from removal. If the person is not eligible for relief he is ordered removed. If eligible for relief the judge inquires if the person wants to apply for such relief, if not he is ordered removed. If the person wants to apply for an available form of relief the case is reset to another master calendar for the person or his attorney (the government does not supply attorneys in Immigration Court proceedings) to file the documentation. The case is then set for an individual hearing on the merits of the application.
    That doesn't seem constitutional and there is legal precedent that illegal immigrants are entitled to the same rights as citizens since they are "persons" (Most notably in Plyler v. Doe, but also in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, Wong Win v. United States, Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, Bridges v. Wixon, Carlson v. Landon, Zadvydas v. Davis, etc.). This has been the case for like 130 years, or was supposed to be. Doesn't matter the flavor of the court of the day, this is the consistent ruling on the issue.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts