Meet The Very Shady Prosecutor Robert Mueller Has Hired For The Russia Investigation

[MisterVeritis]

But as all the evidence flatly contradicts such an insane conspiracy theory, it would be a bad argument.

Do you agree with the others here that the founders thought the president should be able to openly murder someone and not face prosecution?

A good counter argument would be that the founders didn't even dream it was possible that any Americans could ever be as corrupt as the current Republican congress, and so they were counting on congress to keep a criminal president in check.

This is a goofy argument. A president who murders would be impeached and removed from office.

I created a thread you should post in.

http://thepoliticalforums.com/thread...-are-all-Kooks

[mamooth]

This is a goofy argument. A president who murders would be impeached and removed from office.

Murder, yes, our corrupt Republican congress isn't quite that corrupt. Yet. Give them time.

However, Trump should have been impeached already, just for ongoing brazen violation of the emoluments clause, if nothing else. I chose that example because it's a such a flagrant example of cuy-and-dry lawbreaking, do no honest person can deny he's doing it.

Congress ... it just lets him break the law there, without a peep of protest. If a Democratic president kept flouting the law like that, he would have been quickly impeached. The current Republican congress is the most corrupt in US history. And the founders didn't count on that, the majority of congress putting party over country, along with a president and all his supporters. It was just beyond their imagination that any large group of Americans could be as treasonous as modern Republicans.

[Lummy]

Mueller has to prosecute some very shady people. Why not fight fire with fire?

What would that accomplish, other than degrade America's top law enforcement agency even more than it is?