The Post-Nomination Meltdown Has Begun — Brett Kavanaugh Is ‘The Trifecta Of Terrible

[Tahuyaman]

This is an embarrassing post.

unfortunately, the creator of that post was completely serious.

Over the last several decades, the judiciary intentionally has morphed into another arm of the legislative branch. Efforts to get the judical branch back to their intended purpose is looked at as judicial activism by the left. That's inexplicable, but true.

[Tahuyaman]

So, the conservatives have made yet another hysterical "WAAAAAH! WAAAAAH! THE LIBERALS ARE HYSTERICAL! MOMMY, YOU HAVE TO MAKE THE HYSTERICAL LIBERALS STOP!" thread. The irony of it is lost on conservatives, but not on normal people. We see such threads several times a day now. The conservatives are dutiful stenographers, you have to give them that. TheParty sends out their talking points, and the conservatives all rush to be the first to parrot them.

Now, conservatives actually aren't being hypocrites here. Constant hysteria is a way of life for them, hence they don't understand how all the normal people view them as hysterical. Likewise, they're not being dishonest. Their masters have told them the horrible liberals are hysterical, and they always believe what their masters tell them.

That is, the conservatives are just doing what authoritarian followers do, which is believing without question and obeying orders without question.

This is where we liberals feel obligated to step in, due to our overwhelming love of all humanity. We want to save them from an early death. We don't want conservatives to stroke out, or have a coronary, or choke on their own bile and hatred. That's why we're asking them to calm down, for their own sake, and for the sake of those around them.

Remember, melting down at _me_ now will not be good for your blood pressure. Deep breaths, conservatives, deep breaths. That's it. And after you're done, try to come up with a thread idea that's something other than "I HATE YOU AWFUL HYSTERICAL LIBERALS!".

I'm not quite sure what motivates people to make such comments.

[Captdon]

I'm not quite sure what motivates people to make such comments.

I can't tell you without being, at least, tb'd.

[MMC]

The Democrats' Initial Salvo Against Trump's SCOTUS Nominee Blew Up In Their Faces.....


We all know Democrats are against Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh is everything under the sun: he’s anti-worker, anti-woman, and an extremist on Second Amendment rights. He’s not any of these things, by the way. Still, it’s an effective scare maneuver, as Election Day draws nearer. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has already said he’s going to fight Kavanaugh with everything that he’s got at his disposal. It’s not much and whatever attacks they have were flubbed in the opening salvo. They also didn’t use the right picture of Judge Kavanaugh in their initial attack. They used a photo of Judge Thomas Hardiman.


The Women’s March blasted an email, where Kavanaugh’s name isn’t even mentioned. Nominee “XX” is going to destroy the country. Also, we can’t get a press release right. Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) came out against Trump’s nominee before he or she was even revealed at the time. This is very important in that voters were reminded that a) Casey is still a living senator; and b) he’ll pop flares in this fight, but then goes back into bunker—living off the political dividends of his last name (via ABC News):


Yeah, that’s another funny aspect with this fight: how Heritage and the Federalist Society have been smeared as facets of some secret consortium akin from the X-Files because they’ve vetted and picked a solid list of judicial candidates from which the Trump White House can make their own conclusions when vacancies such as these present themselves.....snip~


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...faces-n2499162

[stjames1_53]

I'm not quite sure what motivates people to make such comments.

pure ignorance?

[DLLS]

Could someone please explain this to me? I perceive it as a bit of a contradiction, perhaps it's not.

Saw a news clip of a woman almost in tears saying that if Kavanaugh is confirmed he will eliminate Obama care and the result will be that not only will her young children die but others as well.

On the same day I saw people opining that Kavanaugh cannot be confirmed because he will end abortion.

Can you see my confusion here? Some democrats want Kavanaugh to be defeated because he will kill kids while others want him defeated because he will save the lives of children.

Which is it? Do we want to kill kids or save them? Eagerly awaiting the liberals making up their @#$%ing minds.

[Ransom]

Could someone please explain this to me? I perceive it as a bit of a contradiction, perhaps it's not.

Saw a news clip of a woman almost in tears saying that if Kavanaugh is confirmed he will eliminate Obama care and the result will be that not only will her young children die but others as well.

On the same day I saw people opining that Kavanaugh cannot be confirmed because he will end abortion.

Can you see my confusion here? Some democrats want Kavanaugh to be defeated because he will kill kids while others want him defeated because he will save the lives of children.

Which is it? Do we want to kill kids or save them? Eagerly awaiting the liberals making up their @#$%ing minds.

The media makes their minds up for them.

[Tahuyaman]

pure ignorance?

absolute ignorance is more likely it.