User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 71 to 75 of 75

Thread: The Two Minutes of Hate

  1. #71
    Points: 43,849, Level: 51
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 1,401
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Hoosier8's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10229
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,730
    Points
    43,849
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    1,421
    Thanked 10,220x in 6,442 Posts
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mamooth View Post
    Ah, the irony.

    You know, how most of the Trump cultists here spend their days shrieking about how much they hate liberals, then they spin about and weep about the hateful liberals. The OP gets kudos for at least admitting to his hate.



    Of course there are politics involved. Much harder to fire Rosenstein when he's prosecuting russian spies. Smart move on his part. All he needs is time, and this gets it for him.
    Stupid move and never done. Always a secret indictment so if one gets caught they can be brought to trial. This makes these Russians useless to the US.
    When Donald Trump said to protest “peacefully”, he meant violence.

    When he told protesters to “go home”, he meant stay for an insurrection.

    And when he told Brad Raffensperger to implement “whatever the correct legal remedy is”, he meant fraud.

    War is peace.

    Freedom is slavery.

    Ignorance is strength.

  2. #72
    Points: 265,858, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 73.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308025
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,886
    Points
    265,858
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,925
    Thanked 39,399x in 27,955 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mamooth View Post
    And yet you fail to show any examples of how Obama's EOs were especially unconstitutional.
    It is quite simple. The Constitution does not give the Executive branch any authority to create laws. When a president makes or modifies a law using an executive order the order is unconstitutional. Barack Hussein O rewrote ObamaCare laws repeatedly. He broke the Constitution.

    It is not the number of EOs that is the problem. It is the unconstitutional content. Do you understand?
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (07-23-2018)

  4. #73
    Points: 11,803, Level: 26
    Level completed: 6%, Points required for next Level: 847
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    mamooth's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1089
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    3,594
    Points
    11,803
    Level
    26
    Thanks Given
    15
    Thanked 1,080x in 797 Posts
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    It is quite simple. The Constitution does not give the Executive branch any authority to create laws. When a president makes or modifies a law using an executive order the order is unconstitutional. Barack Hussein O rewrote ObamaCare laws repeatedly. He broke the Constitution.
    I know that's wrong, because courts will strike down unconstitutional EOs. They didn't. No Obama EOs were overturned on constitutional grounds. A few were overturned on technicalities, and some Bush-era EOs were overturned on constitutional grounds during Obama's term, but all of Obama's EOs passed constitutional muster with the courts.

    So, what conspiracy theory will you invoke to explain that?

  5. #74
    Points: 139,062, Level: 89
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 388
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    stjames1_53's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    58456
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    50,865
    Points
    139,062
    Level
    89
    Thanks Given
    105,039
    Thanked 29,477x in 20,424 Posts
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mamooth View Post
    I know that's wrong, because courts will strike down unconstitutional EOs. They didn't. No Obama EOs were overturned on constitutional grounds. A few were overturned on technicalities, and some Bush-era EOs were overturned on constitutional grounds during Obama's term, but all of Obama's EOs passed constitutional muster with the courts.

    So, what conspiracy theory will you invoke to explain that?
    Not if the SCOTUS has liberal hack activists on it...which is why we voted in Trump....he's changing that to Textualists, not Emotionalists
    For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
    "The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
    - Thucydides

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to stjames1_53 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (07-23-2018)

  7. #75
    Points: 265,858, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 73.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308025
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,886
    Points
    265,858
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,925
    Thanked 39,399x in 27,955 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mamooth View Post
    I know that's wrong, because courts will strike down unconstitutional EOs. They didn't. No Obama EOs were overturned on constitutional grounds. A few were overturned on technicalities, and some Bush-era EOs were overturned on constitutional grounds during Obama's term, but all of Obama's EOs passed constitutional muster with the courts.

    So, what conspiracy theory will you invoke to explain that?
    An EO can be unconstitutional without ever being overturned. I thought a friend should tell you.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts