John Brennan Says Trump is Treasonous

[stjames1_53]

So I've noticed how quiet it is around here concerning Trump's Press conference today; former CIA chief John Brennan had a interesting comment:

https://www.vox.com/world/2018/7/16/...eet-treasonous



Our country underwent a cyber attack to our national elections of 2016: it has been confirmed by every intelligence agency in the country and our sitting president, on global television this morning said that he Believed Putin's denial over the findings of his country.

So let's look closely at what our US Constitution has to say on the subject of Treason: Article III, sec 3:



At the very least Donald Trump "adhered" to Vladimir Putin. He sucked up to Putin. He's covering his own[/i]financial[/i] ass in front of and around the leader of a country who electronically attacked our country.

And where ARE the Republicans with condemnation and announced actions?

After this, any Republicans who support Trump better never wave the US flag again.[/FONT][/COLOR]

Our country underwent a cyber attack to our national elections of 2016: it has been confirmed by every intelligence agency in the country and our sitting president, on global television this morning said that he Believed Putin's denial over the findings of his country.

How many was that again? 25, 30, 101?

[Orion Rules]

No mention by Trump of Crimea, Syria, the poisonings in England in addition to the election meddling pass that he gave Vlad. Just like Mr. V The Salesman has sided with Putin and Russia. He's awesome!

What's the President supposed to say that won't be further torn apart? The "meddling pass" he gave Vladimir Putin, for them taking apart how the Obama Administration caused worldwide conflicts, so smart. The taking of the Crimea, while Mr. Obama wanted it. He helped, by the fostering of I.S.I.S., his belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood, to help destroy ancient archaeological sites. You don't remember the smashing of statues, the burning of enlightened studies, the fake revolutions that brought in worse tyrants, the threats to destroy the Giza pyramids, is life long or short? The raging against acres by maniacs, the numbers of death squads killing soldiers on the right side in the battlefields. Die-versity sucks. Some of you just love things as they were, as long as they were never your losses! What cares?! "*"****-****"*"

[DLLS]

Our country underwent a cyber attack to our national elections of 2016: it has been confirmed by every intelligence agency in the country

Actually only three. If you read page 13 of that report where they define high confidence they state that high confidence means they could be wrong.

So you are saying three intelligence agencies stating they could be wrong confirms a cyber attack? Interesting application of logic.

As to the three involved agencies let us look at who was in charge:

James Clapper who lied to Congress under oath.

John Brennan who apparently does not even know the definition of treason or high crimes and misdemeanors and who was an Obama/Clinton stooge.

James Comey oh there is a real prize. Remember how all you democrats hated him when he cost Hillary the election and now all of a sudden you think he is as honest as the day is long.

As to Mueller's charges he will never be able to prove them in court. He couldn't prove them last time when one of the Russians he indicted actually showed up. He whined to the judge that he needed a continuance to prepare. Apparently he is still preparing because the case has never came up for trial, even though the Russian is more than willing to answer the charges.

I haven't laughed this hard since I first heard the late George Carlin discussing the seven words you cannot say on television.

[gamewell45]

So I've noticed how quiet it is around here concerning Trump's Press conference today; former CIA chief John Brennan had a interesting comment:

https://www.vox.com/world/2018/7/16/...eet-treasonous



Our country underwent a cyber attack to our national elections of 2016: it has been confirmed by every intelligence agency in the country and our sitting president, on global television this morning said that he Believed Putin's denial over the findings of his country.

So let's look closely at what our US Constitution has to say on the subject of Treason: Article III, sec 3:



At the very least Donald Trump "adhered" to Vladimir Putin. He sucked up to Putin. He's covering his own[/i]financial[/i] ass in front of and around the leader of a country who electronically attacked our country.

And where ARE the Republicans with condemnation and announced actions?

After this, any Republicans who support Trump better never wave the US flag again.[/FONT][/COLOR]

Apparently Fox Business reporter Trish Regan did not have a single thing flattering to say about the President's meeting with Putin.


http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/58099...#sp=show-clips

[Tahuyaman]

No mention by Trump of Crimea, Syria, the poisonings in England in addition to the election meddling pass that he gave Vlad. Just like Mr. V The Salesman has sided with Putin and Russia. He's awesome!

How do you know what was or was not discussed in their private meeting?

[Tahuyaman]

In spite of the hysterical bloviating by the left, it might be wise to see how Russia acts in the future.

I don't see Trump re-opening Russian Consulates he closed. I don't see him easing sanctions. I don't see him re-admitting Russian diplomats he booted out of the country. I don't see him backing off on supporting the Ukraine with weaponry.


So, you might want to take a breath and see how things go from now on.

[Dr. Who]

you should move to Russia and conduct your own investigation.

Why would I want to do that? I am really only commenting on Trump's foot in mouth problem. No head of state should be even intimating publicly that they believe another head of state over their own intelligence agencies. That goes double for the US. That's just telegraphing to the entire world that US intelligence is not to be believed. Has any other US president ever thrown any American intelligence agency under the bus before the international press in the entire history of America?

Trump hates the intelligence agencies because he fears that they might prove that the Russians somehow engineered his election. His ego can't handle that possibility, no matter how remote, so rather than accept that the Russians were meddling to no great import, he as much as states that US intelligence agencies are manufacturing evidence and that they are completely untrustworthy, but that the "unimpeachable" word of Putin should be accepted without question. Even Putin thought that was going too far - the reaction to Trump's statements are not unreasonable. A President would have to be a traitor or mentally unstable to undermine their own country's integrity in the eyes of the world.

[stjames1_53]

Why would I want to do that? I am really only commenting on Trump's foot in mouth problem. No head of state should be even intimating publicly that they believe another head of state over their own intelligence agencies. That goes double for the US. That's just telegraphing to the entire world that US intelligence is not to be believed. Has any other US president ever thrown any American intelligence agency under the bus before the international press in the entire history of America?

Trump hates the intelligence agencies because he fears that they might prove that the Russians somehow engineered his election. His ego can't handle that possibility, no matter how remote, so rather than accept that the Russians were meddling to no great import, he as much as states that US intelligence agencies are manufacturing evidence and that they are completely untrustworthy, but that the "unimpeachable" word of Putin should be accepted without question. Even Putin thought that was going too far - the reaction to Trump's statements are not unreasonable. A President would have to be a traitor or mentally unstable to undermine their own country's integrity in the eyes of the world.

Trump hates the intelligence agencies because he fears that they might prove that the Russians somehow engineered his election

And you know this how?

[stjames1_53]

Why would I want to do that? I am really only commenting on Trump's foot in mouth problem. No head of state should be even intimating publicly that they believe another head of state over their own intelligence agencies. That goes double for the US. That's just telegraphing to the entire world that US intelligence is not to be believed. Has any other US president ever thrown any American intelligence agency under the bus before the international press in the entire history of America?

Trump hates the intelligence agencies because he fears that they might prove that the Russians somehow engineered his election. His ego can't handle that possibility, no matter how remote, so rather than accept that the Russians were meddling to no great import, he as much as states that US intelligence agencies are manufacturing evidence and that they are completely untrustworthy, but that the "unimpeachable" word of Putin should be accepted without question. Even Putin thought that was going too far - the reaction to Trump's statements are not unreasonable. A President would have to be a traitor or mentally unstable to undermine their own country's integrity in the eyes of the world.

also see #26

[Tahuyaman]

I'm with Rand Paul on this one. Everyone should be very skeptical of our intelligence agencies. They've missed a lot and gotten a lot wrong over the last decade or so.