User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Tariffs. What is the right answer?

  1. #11
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Would the same approach work for fighting the tariff imbalance? What if we ended all tariffs on imports?
    We saw what the Senate did with tariffs on Chinese goods- so no if the US won't follow through it wouldn't work. Had the EU waited a week or so to announce they agree to zero tariffs I am sure the Senate would have caved there as well. If we unilaterally ended all tariff Americans would be buying a lot more foreign goods and less American goods. That means less American's with jobs.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (07-27-2018)

  3. #12
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    Tariffs are a tax on trade. Higher tariffs means less trade. Less trade means less prosperity.
    I agree that tariffs are a tax on trade. Tariffs are used by nations to influence the actions of other nations. Ideally there would be zero tariffs; but zero tariffs for the US and tariffs for our trading partners makes no sense, not unless we want to increase the welfare rolls.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (07-27-2018)

  5. #13
    Points: 265,767, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 64.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308018
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,860
    Points
    265,767
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,901
    Thanked 39,392x in 27,950 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    We saw what the Senate did with tariffs on Chinese goods- so no if the US won't follow through it wouldn't work. Had the EU waited a week or so to announce they agree to zero tariffs I am sure the Senate would have caved there as well. If we unilaterally ended all tariff Americans would be buying a lot more foreign goods and less American goods. That means less American's with jobs.
    Or it might mean more foreign investment in the US.

    If no tariffs mean fewer jobs then do more tariffs mean more jobs? If so why not tariff everything to the point where no one would trade with us?
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  6. #14
    Points: 43,841, Level: 51
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 1,409
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Hoosier8's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10226
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,729
    Points
    43,841
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    1,421
    Thanked 10,217x in 6,440 Posts
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    Tariffs are a tax on trade. Higher tariffs means less trade. Less trade means less prosperity.
    The goal is zero tariffs like the EU agreed to on certain products.
    When Donald Trump said to protest “peacefully”, he meant violence.

    When he told protesters to “go home”, he meant stay for an insurrection.

    And when he told Brad Raffensperger to implement “whatever the correct legal remedy is”, he meant fraud.

    War is peace.

    Freedom is slavery.

    Ignorance is strength.

  7. #15
    Points: 43,841, Level: 51
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 1,409
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Hoosier8's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10226
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,729
    Points
    43,841
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    1,421
    Thanked 10,217x in 6,440 Posts
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I agree that tariffs are a tax on trade. Tariffs are used by nations to influence the actions of other nations. Ideally there would be zero tariffs; but zero tariffs for the US and tariffs for our trading partners makes no sense, not unless we want to increase the welfare rolls.
    For China tariffs are used to protect Chinese manufacturing.
    When Donald Trump said to protest “peacefully”, he meant violence.

    When he told protesters to “go home”, he meant stay for an insurrection.

    And when he told Brad Raffensperger to implement “whatever the correct legal remedy is”, he meant fraud.

    War is peace.

    Freedom is slavery.

    Ignorance is strength.

  8. #16
    Points: 668,085, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433941
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,165
    Points
    668,085
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,224
    Thanked 81,530x in 55,047 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Economically, tariffs make no sense. If we put a tariff on an import, then we are taxing US consumers, and it could be significant because most imports are inputs to manufacturing products all of which will see an increase in price passed on to consumers.

    If another nation irrationally wants to put tariffs on imported US goods and make its people pay more, it matters little. It might reduce demand but the particular good can be exported elsewhere.

    If we remove all tariffs then we will import more goods and that might lead to the so-called and misleading trade deficit. But how is it a deficit? US consumers are paying less and will thus have more to spend on other goods, some of which will be manufactured here. And the money going to foreign nations can only eventually be spent here on US goods or invested in the US. There is no deficit.

    The only counter-argument to this is the political argument for the national defense, the need to be able to manufacture war matériel here rather than depend on other nations.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (07-27-2018),Peter1469 (07-27-2018)

  10. #17
    Points: 84,771, Level: 70
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 79
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Captdon's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12861
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Charleston South Carolina
    Posts
    38,391
    Points
    84,771
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    67,859
    Thanked 12,872x in 10,160 Posts
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Or it might mean more foreign investment in the US.

    If no tariffs mean fewer jobs then do more tariffs mean more jobs? If so why not tariff everything to the point where no one would trade with us?
    We aren't self-sufficient.
    Liberals are a clear and present danger to our nation
    Pick your enemies carefully.






  11. #18
    Points: 41,437, Level: 49
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 413
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Lummy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    6307
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    12,618
    Points
    41,437
    Level
    49
    Thanks Given
    4,948
    Thanked 6,307x in 4,359 Posts
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not an economist (and would rather play 3-card Monty), but this seems a good article in the WSJ from March 2, 2018 titled Reagan Protectionism vs. Trump Protectionism by Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.

  12. #19
    Points: 265,767, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 64.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308018
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,860
    Points
    265,767
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,901
    Thanked 39,392x in 27,950 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If no tariffs mean fewer jobs then do more tariffs mean more jobs? If so why not tariff everything to the point where no one would trade with us?
    Quote Originally Posted by Captdon View Post
    We aren't self-sufficient.
    By this logic, we would be forced to become self-sufficient.

    So, no tariffs or massive tariffs?
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  13. #20
    Points: 84,771, Level: 70
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 79
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Captdon's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12861
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Charleston South Carolina
    Posts
    38,391
    Points
    84,771
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    67,859
    Thanked 12,872x in 10,160 Posts
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    If no tariffs mean fewer jobs then do more tariffs mean more jobs? If so why not tariff everything to the point where no one would trade with us?

    By this logic, we would be forced to become self-sufficient.

    So, no tariffs or massive tariffs?
    Where would we get the rare earth? Where do we get enough platinum? Where do we get titanium? It's not that simple.
    Liberals are a clear and present danger to our nation
    Pick your enemies carefully.






+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts