Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.
stjames1_53 (07-30-2018)
For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
- Thucydides
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
She's extremely active mentally. If everyone stayed engaged in mental activities the way Ginsburg has, they would not experience a lot of the decreases you see in older adults for memory and other cognitive functions. It is like if you stop exercising and your muscles become less strong - the brain is the same way.
Chris (07-30-2018),Green Arrow (07-30-2018),Nicole (07-30-2018)
They are not just a "paper tiger". Hamilton wrote in the Federalist papers that the judicial branch was meant to be the "least dangerous" and they were, until judicial review was established. Judicial review is a significant power, which can be corrupted by activist courts. Marbury v. Madison gave them power and it helps to keep the legislative and executive branches in check, so it is essential. The court seems to go through cycles; Civil War era, FDR era, and the Civil Rights era were all defined by activist courts, but then you had courts like the Rehnquist Court that balanced that by going back to respecting state-rights and trying to devolve the federal government. The Civil Rights era, in my opinion, should be given a pass since their activism on cases like Brown v. Board of Education were positive examples of judicial activism. Of like 1300 state laws found unconstitutional since 1803, 1200 of those occurred during the 1870s and 1880s. Only 170-something federal Acts have been found unconstitutional since 1803. That's not very many - they generally do not abuse the power of judicial review.
Of course, this will become a greater and greater problem if the court remains so politically motivated. Somehow, politicians should focus on getting the court back to a position of judicial restraint. Otherwise, I am not sure that there will be a version of the Rehnquist court in the future that will act as a balance for what is currently happening.
Green Arrow (07-30-2018),Nicole (07-30-2018)
Liberals are a clear and present danger to our nation
Pick your enemies carefully.