Guiliani Switches the Story....again.

[spunkloaf]

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...russia-704752/

So now, it's not "There was no collusion."

Instead, it's "collusion isn't really a crime."

How much are we expected to tolerate as they keep shifting their version of events? How much are they going to be allowed to move the goal post around?

Trump supporters SHOULD be furious, because Trump said all along "THERE WAS NO COLLUSION!" Well, now that has changed. He also said he knew nothing about the Trump Tower meeting. That also has changed.

Why is he allowed to get away with these outright lies? I just dont understand it. The more he lies, the more people defend him. What's up with that?

[Dr. Who]

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...russia-704752/

So now, it's not "There was no collusion."

Instead, it's "collusion isn't really a crime."

How much are we expected to tolerate as they keep shifting their version of events? How much are they going to be allowed to move the goal post around?

Trump supporters SHOULD be furious, because Trump said all along "THERE WAS NO COLLUSION!" Well, now that has changed. He also said he knew nothing about the Trump Tower meeting. That also has changed.

Why is he allowed to get away with these outright lies? I just dont understand it. The more he lies, the more people defend him. What's up with that?

I can only conclude that Trump was correct about his supporters when he said: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters."

[Captdon]

Rolling Stone? Guilianni simply said collusion isn't a crime. He also said Trump never talked to the Russians and that he had the power to fire Comey. He never said or implied anything differently. I watched his interview.


Wow, grasping at straws(Not plastic, I hope).

[MisterVeritis]

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...russia-704752/
So now, it's not "There was no collusion."

Instead, it's "collusion isn't really a crime."

Both statements appear to be true on their face.

[Peter1469]

I have said collusion is not a crime since this fable was spun.

[Cletus]

I can only conclude that Trump was correct about his supporters when he said: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters."

You might want to rethink that. Your history when it comes to reaching conclusions is not all that great.

[Dr. Who]

You might want to rethink that. Your history when it comes to reaching conclusions is not all that great.

Little that I have read from his supporters on this forum would lead me to conclude otherwise.

[Dr. Who]

I have said collusion is not a crime since this fable was spun.

That would depend on the nature of the collusion. Colluding to commit a crime, for instance, is a crime.

[MisterVeritis]

That would depend on the nature of the collusion. Colluding to commit a crime, for instance, is a crime.

Do you have a crime in mind?

[Hoosier8]

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...russia-704752/

So now, it's not "There was no collusion."

Instead, it's "collusion isn't really a crime."

How much are we expected to tolerate as they keep shifting their version of events? How much are they going to be allowed to move the goal post around?

Trump supporters SHOULD be furious, because Trump said all along "THERE WAS NO COLLUSION!" Well, now that has changed. He also said he knew nothing about the Trump Tower meeting. That also has changed.

Why is he allowed to get away with these outright lies? I just dont understand it. The more he lies, the more people defend him. What's up with that?

Show us where collusion is a crime in the law or just quit whining.