PDA

View Full Version : hey Gym Jordan, where are the whistleblowers?



slideman
04-11-2023, 08:55 AM
Gym said he had 19 whistleblowers. He has produced three and they didn't blow the whistle. Instead they ranted about conspiracy theories. That was weeks ago.
Do these whistleblowers exist? It doesn't seem so.

slideman
04-11-2023, 08:58 AM
Democrats debunk Jim Jordan’s FBI ‘whistleblower’ charade

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QgQBqy6HwYg

zelmo1234
04-11-2023, 09:03 AM
It is not time. These need to be 2024 about July! You don't think this is anymore about Justice than the Trump Witch hunt.

This is politics at it's worst. And it is the New way of doing business in DC

slideman
04-11-2023, 09:05 AM
Full List of Jim Jordan's 'Whistleblowers' Scrutinized in Bombshell Report

A new report written by Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee outlines the testimony of three of Jordan's key "whistleblowers" who had private interviews with committee staff.

The report, written by ranking members Jerrold Nadler of New York and Stacey Plaskett, the delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands, claims that the three individuals are not whistleblowers but instead put forward "a wide range of conspiracy theories" and "did not present actual evidence of any wrongdoing" at the FBI or DOJ.

https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-jim-jordans-whistleblowers-scrutinized-bombshell-report-1785425

slideman
04-11-2023, 09:14 AM
Republicans realize committee crusaders are off to a ‘rocky start’
Some Republicans are “getting frustrated” that Jim Jordan and James Comer aren’t producing more results. That’s an understandable response to failure.

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-realize-committee-crusaders-are-rocky-start-rcna78113

zelmo1234
04-11-2023, 09:31 AM
Republicans realize committee crusaders are off to a ‘rocky start’
Some Republicans are “getting frustrated” that Jim Jordan and James Comer aren’t producing more results. That’s an understandable response to failure.

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-realize-committee-crusaders-are-rocky-start-rcna78113

Much like the First Trump Prosecution that most feel is going to fall well short. That is what happens in a political Witch Hunt and these are both witch hunts.

My predictions. Jorden will have his case in the News in July and August of 2024, the Democrats will drop the case of the Documents because of the Biden Stash but the GA and Jan 6 Indictments will come in Mid September 2024 and the Biden Impeachment in October of 2024

All will be a waste of time and US taxpayer money, but that is the way of our Government now, Nothing for the people and we are going to get you to the opposite party

zelmo1234
04-11-2023, 09:32 AM
Republicans realize committee crusaders are off to a ‘rocky start’
Some Republicans are “getting frustrated” that Jim Jordan and James Comer aren’t producing more results. That’s an understandable response to failure.

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-realize-committee-crusaders-are-rocky-start-rcna78113

You are really posting a link from Paul, I mean Rachel??? Much like Hannity, they are not News, they are commentary and spin.

slideman
04-11-2023, 09:39 AM
You are really posting a link from Paul, I mean Rachel??? Much like Hannity, they are not News, they are commentary and spin.

In other words you can't dispute the article so you attempt to discredit the source.
Lame

zelmo1234
04-11-2023, 09:43 AM
In other words you can't dispute the article so you attempt to discredit the source.
Lame
I assume like me you think Jordan's pursuit of this is for political reasons? You do realize that I am agreeing with you on that.

Now if I posted something from Hannity, would you think that is a credible source? I hope not. Madow is the same type of reporter if you will. they are not concerned about anything to do with facts, much like a political witch hunt. It is why the DA in NY had to twist and turn the law to get an indictment. that will likely end his career.

What I am trying to say is that both sides should be up in arms over the weaponization of the Legal system. When it has nothing to do with Justice, and everything to do with politics, it has no business in a legal hearing.

carolina73
04-11-2023, 10:33 AM
The Democrats will be mad when they hear that information is being withheld from them because they leak information to the press on a regular basis. Democrats are going to have to wait to hear the good stuff. Nadler is going to ***t himself.

again

Mini Me
04-11-2023, 10:54 AM
You are really posting a link from Paul, I mean Rachel??? Much like Hannity, they are not News, they are commentary and spin.
Trump's problems have Rachel Maddow cackling with glee!:laugh:

zelmo1234
04-11-2023, 11:04 AM
Trump's problems have Rachel Maddow cackling with glee!:laugh:
And Bidens Troubles have Hannity Cackling with Glee? and still neither one of them is reporting the News.

That is what I am trying to point out.

OLD GUY IN FLORIDA
04-11-2023, 11:27 AM
In other words you can't dispute the article so you attempt to discredit the source.
Lame
I am glad to see you think disputing the source is lame since this is a common tactic of the left. To the Left any source that does not agree with their narrative is to mocked.

zelmo1234
04-11-2023, 11:30 AM
I am glad to see you think disputing the source is lame since this is a common tactic of the left. To the Left any source that does not agree with their narrative is to mocked.
In the case of these propaganda specialist, the source should be disputed. I remember Rush Limbaugh on the Tonight show telling Jay that he is not a member of the press he is an entertainer. under no circumstances were you getting the truth from him or any of these people that is not their job.

LWW
04-11-2023, 12:01 PM
In other words you can't dispute the article so you attempt to discredit the source.
Lame
Rachel Madcow discredited herself. Long ago.

slideman
04-11-2023, 12:15 PM
Rachel Madcow discredited herself. Long ago.

Source be damned. Nothing changes the FACT that Jordan said he had 19 whistleblowers and has produced three conspiracy theorists.
He apparently has no shame. That was predictable from his actions in the past.

zelmo1234
04-11-2023, 12:18 PM
Source be damned. Nothing changes the FACT that Jordan said he had 19 whistleblowers and has produced three conspiracy theorists.
He apparently has no shame. That was predictable from his actions in the past.
Did you think that political investigations and prosecutions was going to lead to something good?

Welcome to your federal Government. Let's say that the Democrats take back the house in 2024, what is the first thing they will do, Investigate the people that investigated them.

This is a never ending cycle of BS Thanks Democrats.

slideman
04-11-2023, 12:30 PM
Did you think that political investigations and prosecutions was going to lead to something good?

Welcome to your federal Government. Let's say that the Democrats take back the house in 2024, what is the first thing they will do, Investigate the people that investigated them.

This is a never ending cycle of BS Thanks Democrats.

Your Democrats showed how it was done with the January 6th hearings. Jordan would like to emulate them but he doesn't have any facts on his side.
He's looking very embarrassed.

Tahuyaman
04-11-2023, 12:38 PM
Lol.

zelmo1234
04-11-2023, 12:38 PM
Your Democrats showed how it was done with the January 6th hearings. Jordan would like to emulate them but he doesn't have any facts on his side.
He's looking very embarrassed.
If you mean by telling half the story, we know that they Hid Video Evidence, Why? because it large it was a political Prosecution, Don't believe me, look at what the same politicians that were outraged by Jan 6 called the riots of 2020 "Peaceful Protests"

And you have not seen the goods on this yet, this is for the middle of next year, this is just a taste. Will it be political BS YES.

That is why you don't have the Trump indictments for GA and Jan 6 those are for closer to the election.

What we have to look forward to

2 months after Trump beats the NY charges, the investigation of Bragg and likely his resignation.

Early Summer 2024 Hunter Biden Indictments.

late Summer The DOJ and FBI election interference hearings and indictments.

Early Fall 2024 Trump Indictments for Jan 6 and GA

late Fall Joe Biden Impeachment.

And all the time that this is happening our elected officials will be telling us that they care so much about the American people

slideman
04-11-2023, 12:44 PM
If you mean by telling half the story, we know that they Hid Video Evidence, Why? because it large it was a political Prosecution, Don't believe me, look at what the same politicians that were outraged by Jan 6 called the riots of 2020 "Peaceful Protests"

And you have not seen the goods on this yet, this is for the middle of next year, this is just a taste. Will it be political BS YES.

That is why you don't have the Trump indictments for GA and Jan 6 those are for closer to the election.

What we have to look forward to

2 months after Trump beats the NY charges, the investigation of Bragg and likely his resignation.

Early Summer 2024 Hunter Biden Indictments.

late Summer The DOJ and FBI election interference hearings and indictments.

Early Fall 2024 Trump Indictments for Jan 6 and GA

late Fall Joe Biden Impeachment.

And all the time that this is happening our elected officials will be telling us that they care so much about the American people

Your fantasy life is a bore

zelmo1234
04-11-2023, 12:46 PM
Your fantasy life is a bore

I hope that you are 100% right, and you can make fun of me for years, but what on that list do you feel is not going to happen?

RMNIXON
04-11-2023, 01:57 PM
The Democrats will be mad when they hear that information is being withheld from them because they leak information to the press on a regular basis. Democrats are going to have to wait to hear the good stuff. Nadler is going to ***t himself.

again



I will wait for official results not left media reporting from the same who constantly promised the end of Trump that never happened....................

carolina73
04-11-2023, 02:25 PM
Your Democrats showed how it was done with the January 6th hearings. Jordan would like to emulate them but he doesn't have any facts on his side.
He's looking very embarrassed.

You realize that all you are talking about is left wing news sources that are discrediting the witnesses. Your same sources were the ones promoting the fake news stories for the FBI. The Steele Dossier. The laptop scandal. The fake story on the phone call. The fake stories of jan 6th and now you admitted agents active in the groups they indicted.

So you MSM claiming sources close to their testimony are the promoters of the fake stories that are being sought from the witnesses.

slideman
04-21-2023, 10:02 AM
You realize that all you are talking about is left wing news sources that are discrediting the witnesses. Your same sources were the ones promoting the fake news stories for the FBI. The Steele Dossier. The laptop scandal. The fake story on the phone call. The fake stories of jan 6th and now you admitted agents active in the groups they indicted.

So you MSM claiming sources close to their testimony are the promoters of the fake stories that are being sought from the witnesses.

I understand. Any news that discomfits you is fake news

slideman
05-20-2023, 10:14 AM
Jordan finally produced what he claimed were three whistleblowers but they turned out to be disgruntled employees who had been disciplined by the agency, who made no specific allegations against any individual for criminal or malfeasant behavior.
A bust

Peter1469
05-20-2023, 10:16 AM
Jordan finally produced what he claimed were three whistleblowers but they turned out to be disgruntled employees who had been disciplined by the agency, who made no specific allegations against any individual for criminal or malfeasant behavior.
A bust
That is an inaccurate description of their testimony. Did you make it up or just listen to the legacy media and fall for it?

slideman
05-22-2023, 09:47 AM
That is an inaccurate description of their testimony. Did you make it up or just listen to the legacy media and fall for it?

Please point to a single specific crime or act of malfeasance that one of these bozos testified to

slideman
05-22-2023, 09:48 AM
Somebody did so and so doesn't cut it
Names dates and places

Peter1469
05-22-2023, 12:37 PM
https://thepoliticalforums.com/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by slideman https://thepoliticalforums.com/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png (https://thepoliticalforums.com/showthread.php?p=3744525#post3744525)
Jordan finally produced what he claimed were three whistleblowers but they turned out to be disgruntled employees who had been disciplined by the agency, who made no specific allegations against any individual for criminal or malfeasant behavior.

A bust

https://thepoliticalforums.com/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Peter1469 https://thepoliticalforums.com/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png (https://thepoliticalforums.com/showthread.php?p=3744527#post3744527)
That is an inaccurate description of their testimony. Did you make it up or just listen to the legacy media and fall for it?
Please point to a single specific crime or act of malfeasance that one of these bozos testified to

You mentioned disgruntled employees. That is inaccurate.

So far as crimes go, an example was the FBI attorney who edited an email in such a way as to be able to use it in a FISA hearing. Tampering with evidence.

The report focused on two broad themes. One, that the entire investigation was based on nothing. Two, that while the DoJ/FBI focused on nothing and Trump, they covered up actual investigations in Clinton and the Clinton foundation.

The investigation was not a criminal investigation. Barr told Durham to establish the facts.

Tahuyaman
05-22-2023, 12:40 PM
Most liberals will condone corruption and illegal conduct as long as their agenda is being fulfilled.

Hoosier8
05-22-2023, 12:43 PM
The same FBI that made up the reason for investigating Trump and when the left are presented with whistleblowers they trust the FBI and not the facts in front of their face.

The left is the new Stasi.

slideman
05-22-2023, 06:12 PM
https://thepoliticalforums.com/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by slideman https://thepoliticalforums.com/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png (https://thepoliticalforums.com/showthread.php?p=3744525#post3744525)
Jordan finally produced what he claimed were three whistleblowers but they turned out to be disgruntled employees who had been disciplined by the agency, who made no specific allegations against any individual for criminal or malfeasant behavior.

A bust

https://thepoliticalforums.com/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Peter1469 https://thepoliticalforums.com/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png (https://thepoliticalforums.com/showthread.php?p=3744527#post3744527)
That is an inaccurate description of their testimony. Did you make it up or just listen to the legacy media and fall for it?

You mentioned disgruntled employees. That is inaccurate.

So far as crimes go, an example was the FBI attorney who edited an email in such a way as to be able to use it in a FISA hearing. Tampering with evidence.

The report focused on two broad themes. One, that the entire investigation was based on nothing. Two, that while the DoJ/FBI focused on nothing and Trump, they covered up actual investigations in Clinton and the Clinton foundation.

The investigation was not a criminal investigation. Barr told Durham to establish the facts.

https://www.americanoversight.org/document/doj-appointment-letter-for-attorney-general-durham-signed-by-attorney-general-barr

NoisyBoy
05-22-2023, 06:15 PM
Be patient it's comin'

Tahuyaman
05-22-2023, 06:31 PM
Why do liberals dislike Jim Jordan? Liberals claim to support more civil liberties. Jordan supports the same. What’s the problem?

The Booman
05-22-2023, 06:56 PM
Gym said he had 19 whistleblowers. He has produced three and they didn't blow the whistle. Instead they ranted about conspiracy theories. That was weeks ago.
Do these whistleblowers exist? It doesn't seem so.
Who the hell is Gym Jordan?

slideman
05-23-2023, 08:49 AM
Who the hell is Gym Jordan?

"Gym" Jordan is a representative in Congress who I believe heads the judiciary committee. He earned his nickname when he failed to report sexual abuse of students at the university where he worked. He was an eyewitness to the abuse. He has no business in government.

slideman
05-23-2023, 08:52 AM
Ex–Ohio State Wrestler Says Rep. Jim Jordan Asked Him to Deny Abuse Allegations

https://www.si.com/more-sports/2020/02/12/jim-jordan-accused-cover-up-sexual-abuse-ohio-state

Tahuyaman
05-25-2023, 12:34 PM
Ex–Ohio State Wrestler Says Rep. Jim Jordan Asked Him to Deny Abuse Allegations

https://www.si.com/more-sports/2020/02/12/jim-jordan-accused-cover-up-sexual-abuse-ohio-state

Jordan said this never happened.

Back on topic though. Did you see the CBS interview with the IRS whistleblower who just went public on how the justice department was impeding the investigation into Hunter Biden’s tax issues?


It must be a big deal if CBS is reporting it.

carolina73
05-25-2023, 12:44 PM
If the FBI and IRS are not worried about the whistleblowers then why don't they just fire them knowing they would win any law suit?

Instead they are trying to destroy the lives of the whistle blowers.

Tahuyaman
05-25-2023, 01:11 PM
One of them just went public and sat for an interview with CBS. When CBS is not hiding something you know there’s some meat on the bone.

CBS spent years covering this up. Now they’re doing a 180.

LWW
05-27-2023, 05:49 AM
Full List of Jim Jordan's 'Whistleblowers' Scrutinized in Bombshell Report

A new report written by Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee outlines the testimony of three of Jordan's key "whistleblowers" who had private interviews with committee staff.

The report, written by ranking members Jerrold Nadler of New York and Stacey Plaskett, the delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands, claims that the three individuals are not whistleblowers but instead put forward "a wide range of conspiracy theories" and "did not present actual evidence of any wrongdoing" at the FBI or DOJ.

https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-jim-jordans-whistleblowers-scrutinized-bombshell-report-1785425
Nadler?

Isn’t that like asking Charles Manson believes Bugliosi’s evidence?

slideman
06-03-2023, 12:39 PM
Nadler?

Isn’t that like asking Charles Manson believes Bugliosi’s evidence?

Newsweek? Probably communist huh? Lol