PDA

View Full Version : Human-Like Fossils Found In China Cave Puzzle Scientists....



MMC
03-18-2012, 09:02 AM
The most recent fossils ever found of a human-like species in southeast China have presented scientists with a mystery about what may be an unknown Stone Age culture, researchers said Wednesday.
Sometimes called the "red deer people," the remains are about 11,500 to 14,500 years old and appear to show a mix of modern and archaic peoples, said an Australian and Chinese team of researchers in the journal PLoS One.

"These new fossils might be of a previously unknown species, one that survived until the very end of the Ice Age around 11,000 years ago," said lead author Darren Curnoe, a professor at the University of New South Wales.
"Alternatively, they might represent a very early and previously unknown migration of modern humans out of Africa, a population who may not have contributed genetically to living people."

Before the red deer people, no fossils younger than 100,000 years old were found in mainland East Asia, but the latest discoveries suggest the land may not have been vacant of our human-like cousins after all, the researchers said.....snip~

http://news.yahoo.com/human-fossils-china-caves-puzzle-scientists-173555421.html

:undecided: The discovery has been ongoing with the Red Deer People. Now More! Thoughts?

spunkloaf
03-18-2012, 10:27 AM
http://www.google.com/url?source=imglanding&ct=img&q=http://troll.me/images/ancient-aliens-guy/trust-me-its-fucking-aliens-brah.jpg&sa=X&ei=vP5lT9_jFoOo0AGa0L3xBw&ved=0CAkQ8wc&usg=AFQjCNGWy3tPvk5BjcyxG0BBlncHMDCzlA

Mister D
03-18-2012, 10:33 AM
Very interesting. They've also found early remains in Central Asia. Anyway, if these populations passed on any genetic material to moderns Europeans and Asians as Neanderthals have then Homo Sapiens are even more diverse than we now think.

MMC
03-18-2012, 10:38 AM
I was noting the part about a population that may not have genetically contributed to living people. :icon_study:

Mister D
03-18-2012, 10:43 AM
I was noting the part about a population that may not have genetically contributed to living people. :icon_study:

I'm sure there will be more about this in time. I don't know if DNA can be extracted from what they found though.

MMC
03-18-2012, 11:03 AM
Wonder how they are getting that timeline? If they have not carbon dated it. I know that some dispute carbon dating. But all MS archeology uses it.

Mister D
03-18-2012, 11:08 AM
Wonder how they are getting that timeline? If they have not carbon dated it. I know that some dispute carbon dating. But all MS archeology uses it.

Not sure but carbon dating hasn't been around that long. There are other ways of dating material (e.g. you can make a reliable determination from the strata an object is found at a site and what was found with it).

ramone
03-18-2012, 12:23 PM
Because of the rates of decay, radiocarbon dating is not useful for sites older than 50,000 years old. Archaeological sites older than that period must rely on alternative means of dating.



It would have to be something else like Stratigraphy.

http://archaeology.about.com/od/rterms/g/radiocarbon.htm

Mister D
03-18-2012, 12:47 PM
It would have to be something else like Stratigraphy.

http://archaeology.about.com/od/rterms/g/radiocarbon.htm

Exactly

ramone
03-19-2012, 07:43 PM
Exactly

There is something new in dating but I forgot what they called it. Not sure about the accuracy of it however, seen it once on discovery or natgeo. Not sure which one.

Mister D
03-19-2012, 07:47 PM
There is something new in dating but I forgot what they called it. Not sure about the accuracy of it however, seen it once on discovery or natgeo. Not sure which one.

The strata method is old school but reliable. I'm sure there are several more.

MMC
03-19-2012, 07:59 PM
Carbon dating of charcoal found with the fossils helped scientists establish their age. The charcoal itself showed the people knew how to use fire; and stone artifacts suggest they were toolmakers.....snip~

If there are remnants of fired clay (like clay and stone hearths for cooking) they might be able to use Archaeomagnetic dating.

Mister D
03-19-2012, 08:01 PM
Carbon dating of charcoal found with the fossils helped scientists establish their age. The charcoal itself showed the people knew how to use fire; and stone artifacts suggest they were toolmakers.....snip~

If there are remnants of fired clay (like clay and stone hearths for cooking) they might be able to use Archaeomagnetic dating.

Ah, I see. Interesting.