PDA

View Full Version : Even the oecd dislikes greedy republicans



Carygrant
06-26-2012, 01:42 PM
Wake up Republicans -- is everybody wrong but you ?

Limiting the tax relief available to the richest Americans on pension contributions and mortgage payments will help curb income inequality that the OECD says is the fourth-highest among the 34 countries it surveys.

“Income inequality and relative poverty are among the highest in the OECD,” the organisation said in its annual survey of the US. “At the same time, there is no consensus in the economic literature that reducing inequality would be harmful to economic growth.”

The recommendations are likely to be welcomed by President Barack Obama but rejected by Mitt Romney, his Republican challenger for The White House. The role taxes should play in both bolstering the country’s recovery, as well as cutting the US deficit, is one of the starkest dividing lines between Republicans and Democrats with presidential and congressional elections less than five months away.

The OECD also joined the growing chorus of groups warning that politicians in Washington must stop the world’s largest economy falling off what has been dubbed a “fiscal cliff” at the end of the year. Broad tax increases and spending cuts are due to take effect in January in a combination that the Congressional Budget Office has said will tip the economy back into recession.

Despite the pace of job creation in the US slowing over the last three months, the OECD stuck with its prediction that the economy will expand 2.4pc this year and 2.6pc in 2013. The report from the OECD, which is based in Paris, did not advocate a fresh round of monetary stimulus, but argued that “the downside risks to the economy in the near term suggest that policy makers should continue to support the recovery.”Although the OECD did not cut its forecasts for US growth, Tuesday did provide evidence that Americans are becoming gloomier about their own prospects. Consumer confidence this month dropped to its lowest level since January, according to the latest reading from the Conference Board.

Its index fell to 62 in June, shy of what economists had forecast, and down from 64.4 in May. More worryingly, an index measuring expectations for the next six months dropped to its lowest since November.
“Unfortunately, (lower) prices at the pump were not enough to offset glum labour market developments and negative headlines from Europe,” said Guy Berger, an economist at Royal Bank of Scotland.
As reported by The Daily Telegraph on June 26 th .

Chris
06-26-2012, 02:32 PM
Are you saying the oecd doesn't care about greedy democrats? Seems to me the oecd is speaking about the richest Americans, rep or dem or nota.

I heard the other day the US is among the top 1% of the world, yes. Should we level the playing field and give our wealth away to the other 99% of the world?



What does the oecd have to say about income mobility and the fact very few people stay in any income group long but move up and down all the time.




(As moderator I ask would you be so kind as to provide a link to your cut and pasted article. See rule 4 in Rules of the Board aka Common Sense and Decency (http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/14-Rules-of-the-Board-aka-Common-Sense-and-Decency).)

Carygrant
06-26-2012, 03:36 PM
The Telegraph , Economics Section , June 26 th , reported by Richard Blackden
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews
More results from telegraph.co.uk » (http://uk.search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A7x9QX5VHOpPaAgAXsRLBQx.?&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-702&p=site:telegraph.co.uk%20breaking+world+news)

I am not saying anything . I am reporting what the OECD found and reported

Peter1469
06-26-2012, 04:37 PM
I would say end the tax on productivity and tax consumption. http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer

The rich would pay more under that.

Carygrant
06-26-2012, 04:49 PM
You won't get any right wing response here .
They fly into denial . Far easier for them to write rubbish about their President and blame the woes of the world onto him .

Peter1469
06-26-2012, 05:09 PM
You won't get any right wing response here .
They fly into denial . Far easier for them to write rubbish about their President and blame the woes of the world onto him .


Define right wing. You have seen several responses from what I call right wing.....

waltky
11-17-2016, 12:34 AM
OECD nations see 650% increase of deaths from terrorism... Deaths from terrorism in OECD nations jump 650% Thu, Nov 17, 2016 - TERROR SPREAD: While fatalities from global terrorism fell 10% to 29,376 last year, 21 of the 34 OECD member countries witnessed at least one attack, a report said
Deaths from terrorism in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) nations increased 650 percent last year, despite a marked fall globally as Islamic State and Boko Haram militants suffered military defeats at home, but committed more attacks abroad, a report said yesterday. The Global Terrorism Index (GTI) said that worldwide there were 29,376 deaths caused by terrorism last year, a drop of 10 percent and the first fall in four years, as action against Islamic State in Iraq and Boko Haram in Nigeria reduced the numbers killed there by a third. However, the report said the groups had spread their actions to neighboring states and regions, causing a huge increase in fatalities among OECD members, most of which are wealthy countries, such as the US and European nations.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/images/2016/11/17/P07-161117-327.jpg Iraqis carry white flags as they walk to an area held by the Iraqi Special Forces 2nd Division in the Samah neighborhood of Mosul yesterday, during an ongoing operation against Islamic State militants. It said 21 of the 34 OECD member countries had witnessed at least one attack, with most deaths occurring in Turkey and France, where coordinated attacks by Islamic State gunmen and suicide bombers at the Bataclan music venue, a soccer stadium and several cafes in Paris in November last year killed 130 people. Denmark, France, Germany, Sweden and Turkey all suffered their worst death tolls from terrorism in a single year since 2000, according to the index which is produced by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) think tank. In total, 23 countries registered their highest-ever number of terrorism deaths. “While on the one hand the reduction in deaths is positive, the continued intensification of terrorism in some countries and its spread to new ones is a cause for serious concern and underscores the fluid nature of modern terrorist activity,” IEP executive chairman Steve Killelea said. “The attacks in the heartland of Western democracies underscore the need for fast-paced and tailored responses to the evolution of these organizations,” he said. The annual index ranks nations based on data from the Global Terrorism Database run by a consortium based at the US University of Maryland. Iraq, Afghanistan, Nigeria, Pakistan and Syria, which accounted for 72 percent of all deaths, were the top five ranked countries in the GTI. The US ranked 36th, with France 29th, Russia 30th and the UK 34th. The global economic impact of terrorism was assessed to be US$89.6 billion, with Iraq suffering the greatest impact, at 17 percent of its GDP. Islamic State was the deadliest group last year, the report said, overtaking Boko Haram with attacks in 252 cities that led to 6,141 deaths. However, Boko Haram’s move into neighboring countries Niger, Cameroon and Chad saw the number of fatalities in these countries increase by 157 percent. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2016/11/17/2003659458