Mental interface with electronics - matrix.

[Brett Nortje]

This project i wanted to leave up to someone else, but have come to look at it as my responsibility. if we were to try to interface with electronic components with a typical 'wave,' it would leave us with a parched motherboard, if you ask me, so, we need to interface with 'controllable systems.'

This can be done with electromagnetism! if we were to use electromagnetism to interface, we would see our will exerted directly onto the components. this will may be to watch porn or something, but nevertheless it will be our will imposed onto the 'computer.' this can be done with fluctuating the energy processes, by way of circuitry, where we 'turn little circuits on or off.'

This can be done by feeling the computer with your own mind. simply 'tuning' into the motherboard will leave you with a plethora of circuits, and, then we can easily turn them on or off, but, we will not know which ones to turn on or off! this means we need to imagine the motherboard in our minds, and 'flip switches manually.' then, we will get the hang of it, i suppose.

[Brett Nortje]

Before we jump onto the net, we need to find a way to be inside the bits and bytes as a 'entity.' This would be where we encapsulate our minds into bits and bytes and then project waves to the computer and receive bits and bytes as if they were 'magnetic waves' themselves. this will let us navigate the computer as if it were terrain, and move through switches at a heck of a speed, turning them on or off.

This will probably just be a red herring but let's try it anyways;

If we were to send waves to the computer, and receive pulses along this 'extended consciousness,' which reaches outside our bodies, then we could guide the computer to do things like insert entries onto the computer as if we were a 'terminal.'

I am going to try to turn my monitor orange for a second, then back again. this will be an 'override.' i hope i don't crash it!

[Brett Nortje]

I had to switch from the 'motherboard to the monitor' and saw a few pixels go orange! what a lot of effort!

[Brett Nortje]

To get a graphic interface with the computer, you need to observe the way graphics work. if they were to work from the key board and mouse to the motherboard, then to the monitor, or, from the net to the motherboard to the monitor, then you know the 'route.' then you need to form, somehow, most probably in your mind, a route for the impulse to travel from the 'motherboard' to the 'monitor.' this route would be from the motherboards graphics card, to the 'plug' for it from the card to the motherboard, then down the motherboard to the monitor plug, then up the chord in 'bits and joules,' to the 'monitor back drop' of switches to the pixels that change. the thing is, the pixels change because of input, input to the switches, and the switches will change pixel darkness.

[Brett Nortje]

This is seeming harder the more i get into it! still, we have had minor success already, what with that pixel changing color!

For us to get real graphic user interface, we need to take control of the whole monitor or motherboard, i am not sure where to start. then, we need to project a monitor from behind, so we will be working in reverse, yes? this will let us change the pixel's brightness from dark or off to on or brighter. if you were to observe the color spectrum, blue and purple will be the darkest, and orange and yellow will be the brightest, needing the most energy from yourself.

The trick might be to get our nervous system to interface with the computer. maybe if we were to imagine our nervous system imposed onto the motherboard and c.p.u. we could get this done better? maybe we could imagine or visualize our nervous system as a bus, we could change our energy to bits and bytes, by, making them on and off things, or, binary, the simplest form of communication. this would be where there are eight bits to be filled in, with the first being one, then two, then four, and finding multiples of them to put the bit on or off or in between. this surge of activity will interface with the bus and then there can be 'communication.'

[Brett Nortje]

We still don't know how to interface with the computer! this is the first step if you ask me, so, maybe we should start over? The easiest way to interface with a computer is to be the end user and interface as per usual. this changes if you want to use your nervous system instead of a key board and mouse. so, instead let's start with the main input device;


In computing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computing), a computer keyboard is a typewriter-style device (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typewriter#Keyboard_layouts:_.22QWERTY.22_and_othe rs) which uses an arrangement of buttons or keys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push-button) to act as a mechanical lever or electronic switch. Following the decline of punch cards (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punch_card) and paper tape (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_tape), interaction via teleprinter (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleprinter)-style keyboards became the main input device (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Input_device) for computers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer).

So, the most efficient way of getting to the computer is to press the levers of the key board. these interface with the computer by;


Computer keyboards include control circuitry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_controller_(computing)) to convert key presses into key codes (usually scancodes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scancodes)) that the computer's electronics can understand. The key switches are connected via the printed circuit board in an electrical X-Y matrix where a voltage is provided sequentially to the Y lines and, when a key is depressed, detected sequentially by scanning the X lines.

So, it is down to y codes or y lines, as we do not ant to press the x lines. of course, the x lines could be influenced also by the mind, as this is the language the computer understands.


There are several ways of connecting a keyboard to a system unit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_unit) (more precisely, to its keyboard controller (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_controller_(computing))) using cables, including the standard AT connector (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT_keyboard) commonly found on motherboards, which was eventually replaced by the PS/2 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PS/2_connector) and the USB (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus) connection. Prior to the iMac line of systems, Apple used the proprietary Apple Desktop Bus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Desktop_Bus) for its keyboard connector.

Wireless (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless) keyboards have become popular for their increased user freedom. A wireless keyboard often includes a required combination transmitter and receiver unit that attaches to the computer's keyboard port. The wireless aspect is achieved either by radio frequency (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequency) (RF) or by infrared (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared) (IR) signals sent and received from both the keyboard and the unit attached to the computer. A wireless keyboard may use an industry standard RF, called Bluetooth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth). With Bluetooth, the transceiver may be built into the computer. However, a wireless keyboard needs batteries to work and may pose a security problem due to the risk of data "eavesdropping (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eavesdropping)" by hackers. Wireless solar keyboards (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_keyboard) charge their batteries from small solar panels (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_panel) using sunlight (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight) or standard artificial lighting. An early example of a consumer wireless keyboard is that of the Olivetti Envision (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivetti_Envision).

So, this is what we are trying to do, for a start! wireless keyboard operations...

[Brett Nortje]

The way i see it, we either need to;


Sonar (originally an acronym (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym) for SOund Navigation And Ranging) is a technique that uses sound (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound) propagation (usually underwater, as in submarine navigation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_navigation)) to navigate (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navigation), communicate with or detect objects on or under the surface of the water, such as other vessels. Two types of technology share the name "sonar": passive sonar is essentially listening for the sound made by vessels; active sonar is emitting pulses of sounds and listening for echoes. Sonar may be used as a means of acoustic location (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_location) and of measurement of the echo characteristics of "targets" in the water. Acoustic location in air was used before the introduction of radar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar). Sonar may also be used in air for robot navigation, and SODAR (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SODAR) (an upward looking in-air sonar) is used for atmospheric investigations. The term sonar is also used for the equipment used to generate and receive the sound. The acoustic frequencies used in sonar systems vary from very low (infrasonic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrasonic)) to extremely high (ultrasonic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasound)). The study of underwater sound is known as underwater acoustics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underwater_acoustics) or hydroacoustics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroacoustics).

Or, we need to;


Echolocation, also called bio sonar, is the biological sonar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonar) used by several kinds of animals (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animals) Echolocating animals emit calls out to the environment and listen to the echoes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echo_(phenomenon)) of those calls that return from various objects near them. They use these echoes to locate and identify the objects. Echolocation is used for navigation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_navigation) and for foraging (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foraging) (or hunting) in various environments. Some blind humans (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_echolocation) have learned to find their way using clicks produced by a device or by mouth.

Echolocating animals include some mammals and a few birds; most notably microchiropteran (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchiroptera) bats (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat) and odontocetes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odontocetes) (toothed whales and dolphins), but also in simpler form in other groups such as shrews (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrew), one genus of megachiropteran (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megachiroptera) bats (Rousettus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rousettus)) and two cave dwelling bird (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird) groups, the so-called cave swiftlets (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiftlet) in the genus Aerodramus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerodramus) (formerly Collocalia) and the unrelatedOilbird (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oilbird) Steatornis caripensis.[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_echolocation#cite_note-Rousettus-1)

Or, a combination of the two.

If we were to emit sounds that we hear, so as to speak to ourselves, we could speak to the terminal too, and, that terminal could influence our mental messages to ourselves as if they were just reading us infrmation. i hope this works, going to try it now!

[Brett Nortje]

Of course, the energy we are sending out is electromagnetic, all energy is. if we were to send these sound vibrations out, though using our throats from our voice box, which is a vibration that 'echoes around,' we could easily see the echoes return to us with the relevant information. simply sitting around typing our our keyboards now will reveal the key stroke sound of the register in the serial bus to remind us of which key stroke sounds like what, yes? let's type them all? a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z.

So, we have got all the right sounds for the key strokes down, and we know that they all carry electric charge. how do we get these charged sound waves to influence the serial bus? i suppose if we were to charge the sounds with extra energy, we could make the impulse more severe, and then charge the serial bus with energy that we do not yet know will do what? :shocked:

Maybe if we were to observe that the energy we are sending the serial bus is merely a sound wave, we could, for a start, get a key stroke in? this could be done by listening to those key strokes i asked you to, and then sending out the same signal that we send when we are thinking of sending this key stroke to the computer. this will make the computer enter the same thing we hear, just played in reverse, as, the signal goes in one way, and comes out the other side, so it is either the same or reversed, or, encoded, hmmph.

So, let's say it is encoded? if we were to send a sound wave to the serial bus that is made of magnetism, maybe this will work better? concentrating on the physical side of the electromagnetic side, instead of the charge and spin, might see the magnetic components change?

[Brett Nortje]

For this interface, the system seems to be out through the mouth, and in through the hairs of the ears. i am sure each process has it's own unique sound, so they will be identified by the ears, but, we do not know which sounds make which process! this means, we should mess around on our computer, listening for sounds to repeat, through our subconscious, which will identify things we like, and repeat them. like i said, probably a lot of porn!


In computing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computing), bus mastering is a feature supported by many bus architectures (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_bus) that enables a device connected to the bus to initiate transactions. It is also referred to as "first-party DMA", in contrast with "third-party DMA" where a system DMA controller (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_I/O) (also known as peripheral processor, I/O processor, or channel) actually does the transfer.Some types of buses allow only one device (typically the CPU (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Processing_Unit), or its proxy) to initiate transactions. Most modern bus architectures, such as PCI (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripheral_Component_Interconnect), allow multiple devices to bus masterbecause it significantly improves performance for general purpose operating systems (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system). Some real-time operating systems (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_operating_system) prohibit peripherals from becoming bus masters, because the scheduler can no longer arbitrate for the bus and hence cannot provide deterministic latency.
While bus mastering theoretically allows one peripheral device to directly communicate with another, in practice almost all peripherals master the bus exclusively to perform DMA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_memory_access) to main memory.
If multiple devices are able to master the bus, there needs to be a bus arbitration scheme to prevent multiple devices attempting to drive the bus simultaneously. A number of different schemes are used for this; for example SCSI (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCSI) has a fixed priority for each SCSI ID. PCI does not specify the algorithm to use, leaving it up to the implementation to set priorities.

Maybe the right way to approach this is through direct energy usage of the bus?


Digital electronics or digital (electronic) circuits are electronics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronics) that handle digital signals (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signals) - discrete bands of analog (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_electronics) levels (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_potential) - rather than bycontinuous (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuity_(mathematics)) ranges (as used in analogue electronics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogue_electronics)). All levels within a band of values represent the same numeric value. Because of thisdiscretization (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discretization), relatively small changes to the analog signal levels due to manufacturing tolerance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering_tolerance), signal attenuation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_loss) or parasitic noise (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noise_(electronics)) do not leave the discrete envelope, and as a result are ignored by signal state sensing circuitry.In most cases, the number of these states is two, and they are represented by two voltage bands: one near a reference value (typically termed as "ground" or zero volts), and the other a value near the supply voltage. These correspond to the "false" ("0") and "true" ("1") values of theBoolean domain (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_domain) respectively, named after its inventor, George Boole (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Boole), yielding binary code (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_code).
Digital techniques are useful because it is easier to get an electronic device to switch into one of a number of known states than to accurately reproduce a continuous range of values.
Digital electronic circuits (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_circuit) are usually made from large assemblies of logic gates (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_gate), simple electronic representations of Boolean logic functions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_logic#Digital_electronic_circuit_design).[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_electronics#cite_note-1)

Well, that shows that the energy required to turn circuits on or off is either low voltage or high voltage, yes?

Now, to get a graphic of the serial bus, we need to observe the various circuits that are influenced with each key stroke. these circuits will return a positive magnetic charge when we 'hear them.'

[Brett Nortje]

If we were to turn this energy 'into' the computer, we need an 'entry point.' this would be through the u.s.b. devices, yes?


USB, short for Universal Serial Bus, is an industry standard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_standard) developed in the mid-1990s that defines the cables, connectors andcommunications protocols (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_protocol) used in a bus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_(computing)) for connection, communication, and power supply between computers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer) and electronic devices.[4] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#cite_note-4) It is currently developed by the USB Implementers Forum (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_Implementers_Forum).
USB was designed to standardize the connection of computer peripherals (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_peripheral) (including keyboards, pointing devices (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouse_(computing)), digital cameras, printers, portable media players (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_media_player), disk drives (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_drive) and network adapters (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_interface_controller)) to personal computers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_computer), both to communicate and to supply electric power (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power). It has become commonplace on other devices, such as smartphones (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone), PDAs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_digital_assistant) and video game consoles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_console).[5] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#cite_note-5) USB has effectively replaced a variety of earlier interfaces, such as parallel ports (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_port), as well as separate power chargers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_charger) for portable devices.

The way this works is to have the bus of two things connect, so, you need to turn your nervous system into a u.s.b. of sorts. this can be done by connecting the two with energy, electrical, sonar or some other kind of wave.

[Brett Nortje]

So far we know only that we can send and hear from the computer, if we were to listen for signals from the computer. this would be boosted if we could see what we were doing, yes? this could be visualized through 'matrix sight.' matrix sight would be where we picture the computer in our mind, and then activate certain areas, or, specific combinations of areas we are familiar with, to sned instructions to the computer and have them 'executed.'

[I am still trying to type a letter without pressing the keys!]

So, if we were to be able to send a wave to the computer, we will get our response from the monitor of sound blasters. these are thw only two ways the computer 'interfaces' with us.

Actually, this reminds me of a spell i made a while ago, called puppeteer. if we were to imagine the person's body in our mind, and superimpose them together, then we could control them slightly, as if a puppeteer.

And, if that works, then we need to superimpose our body onto the whole 'computer's insides.' or, maybe we should try to impose the computer onto our body? this will lead to a communication of some sort, i hope?

Of course, this probably won't work, but i am a firm believer in this matrix thing! if we were to impose this onto the computer, or vice versa, we could maybe find a way to get them communicating as the same rates.

Maybe if we were to think of each muscle as a transistor, and each circuit as a nerve, or something, then we could biointerface with this computer contraption?

[Brett Nortje]

Maybe we should connect to the computer, for trail and error read outs and activations, by way of the modem? this receives and transmits bandwidth for the computer to read and execute?

[Brett Nortje]

Has completed this 'project.'

He says that, "you need to imagine that you are underwater and then lift the plugs into the peripherals and then introduce them to 'influx."

That is how he explains it. we had a race! he won...

[Brett Nortje]

He also says that, "you need to imagine you are underwater and in a sieve, and then grate yourself for energy."

It seems that with these statements, it is easy to see that you need water to conduct the energy. this is easy to see since you need the water vapor to do this, and then you also need to imagine that the person has plugs to affect them - this could some new wave telepathy? where would the plug on the person go? to interface with them, i suppose it could be with their nerves in their eyes ears mouth nose and skin - i heard he 'skinned' some very evil people too.

This influx would mean that you need to inject them - the machines - with input?

[Brett Nortje]

I figure anything is doable now, and figure that the matrix was a movie about the fantasies of the writer. think about the fantasies of people as being able to fly - they can now parachute, fly in a plane and use those jump suites with the wings. all fantasies, if provided in such a profitable way, will result in something one day. no different with this.

So, you can submerge yourself in the 'water vapor' and then affect other 'atoms' by relays and transmitting energy from your nervous system to other things. my peer also says he can affect simple things like microwaves, televisions and toasters. hurting people is the problem though, as he even hurt me, nearly splitting my tricep part of my arm in the armpit while i was showering. this could mean that being submerged in real water is really looking for trouble!

The next step, after mastering the electric aspects of electromagnetism, is obviously the magnetism. this would be where the user will use the magnetic fields of the quarks to affect other things. maybe he could pick up a penknife? let us try to set him targets?

If the pen knife has less mass than him, or as much force as he has under his control, then he could, having influence over more mass than he has totally, being 'conscious,' he might be able to pick up the penknife without touching it? this would require that he exerts force, not from himself, but rather underneath the penknife or around it pushing or pulling it up, yes?