User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 20 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 193

Thread: John Roberts Decides To Help the Enemy Hide The Number of Infiltrates in the US

  1. #1
    Points: 17,291, Level: 31
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 159
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    VeteranTagger Second Class10000 Experience Points
    Sergeant Gleed's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2046
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Right Now? The Planet Gand
    Posts
    4,872
    Points
    17,291
    Level
    31
    Thanks Given
    492
    Thanked 2,038x in 1,586 Posts
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    John Roberts Decides To Help the Enemy Hide The Number of Infiltrates in the US

    No link, sorry.

    But Chief Justice Roberts, who famously sold America down the river of MessiahCare, has once again struck a blow for tyranny.

    His one vote, his one unelected for life vote, sent the decision about something as simple as the Citizenship Question in the Census back to the lower court to be redecided.

    The form has to be submitted to the printer on the first of July.

    Fascism wins another round.

    Unless Trump flatly orders the form to include the question sent to the printers.

    He too has a phone and a pen.
    Freedom Requires Obstinance.

    We the People DID NOT vote in a majority Rodent Congress, they stole it via election fraud.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Sergeant Gleed For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-27-2019)

  3. #2
    Points: 26,507, Level: 39
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 443
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteranSocial50000 Experience Points
    Beevee's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    58827
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Near Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    8,818
    Points
    26,507
    Level
    39
    Thanks Given
    40
    Thanked 1,826x in 1,454 Posts
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    LOL.
    The only thing that will make deplorables happy is the total rape of America by those who yearn for total control of business and society.

  4. #3

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 74,146, Level: 66
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 1,304
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    195656
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    32,243
    Points
    74,146
    Level
    66
    Thanks Given
    3,660
    Thanked 27,341x in 15,822 Posts
    Mentioned
    412 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Beevee View Post
    LOL.
    The only thing that will make deplorables happy is the total rape of America by those who yearn for total control of business and society.
    What does that have to do with a citizenship question on the census?
    “Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.” - Barry Goldwater

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cletus For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (07-23-2019),Tahuyaman (06-27-2019)

  6. #4
    Points: 430,479, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307720
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    182,743
    Points
    430,479
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,115
    Thanked 76,735x in 55,431 Posts
    Mentioned
    695 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    What does that have to do with a citizenship question on the census?
    I don't know why anyone would oppose determining how many people residing in the US are actually citizens.

  7. #5
    Points: 430,479, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307720
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    182,743
    Points
    430,479
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,115
    Thanked 76,735x in 55,431 Posts
    Mentioned
    695 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Beevee View Post
    LOL.
    The only thing that will make deplorables happy is the total rape of America by those who yearn for total control of business and society.
    How is determine how many people in the US are actual citizens facilitating the "total rape of America" or giving businesses complete control of society?

  8. #6

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 470,729, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 79.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    200579
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    52,701
    Points
    470,729
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,028
    Thanked 45,849x in 24,772 Posts
    Mentioned
    880 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that SCOTUS was suspicious of the intent as to why this was put on there. I think that they found the Administration's argument to be argle-bargle.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    Standing Wolf (06-27-2019)

  10. #7
    Points: 262,886, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 87.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307722
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,154
    Points
    262,886
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,442
    Thanked 39,096x in 27,768 Posts
    Mentioned
    385 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    I think that SCOTUS was suspicious of the intent as to why this was put on there. I think that they found the Administration's argument to be argle-bargle.
    Suspicion is not a constitutional argument.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    Sergeant Gleed (06-27-2019)

  12. #8
    Points: 74,117, Level: 66
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 1,333
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Standing Wolf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    314891
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    25,513
    Points
    74,117
    Level
    66
    Thanks Given
    5,696
    Thanked 21,008x in 12,234 Posts
    Mentioned
    414 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Suspicion is not a constitutional argument.
    No, it isn't...but when evidence of bad intent and motives - in this case, an attempt to provide some advantage to one political Party by adding the question to the census - is presented to the Court, it is the Court's duty to consider that evidence in their deliberations, and in their final decision. Previous courts have already ruled on the sort of questions that can, for statistical purposes, be added to the census, and attempting to do so for partisan reasons has never been found to be acceptable.

    Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution mandates an enumeration of "free Persons", and directs that Congressional representation should be based on those numbers. Nothing in that clause, or in the deliberations of the Founders, would indicate that citizenship should in any way be a factor to be considered in either procedure.
    "The first thing you want to do after being shot is make sure you are not shot again." - Ace Atkins

    "Only a rank degenerate would drive 1,500 miles across Texas and not eat a chicken fried steak."
    - Larry McMurtry



  13. #9
    Points: 262,886, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 87.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307722
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,154
    Points
    262,886
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,442
    Thanked 39,096x in 27,768 Posts
    Mentioned
    385 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Standing Wolf View Post
    No, it isn't...but when evidence of bad intent and motives - in this case, an attempt to provide some advantage to one political Party by adding the question to the census - is presented to the Court, it is the Court's duty to consider that evidence in their deliberations, and in their final decision. Previous courts have already ruled on the sort of questions that can, for statistical purposes, be added to the census, and attempting to do so for partisan reasons has never been found to be acceptable.

    Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution mandates an enumeration of "free Persons", and directs that Congressional representation should be based on those numbers. Nothing in that clause, or in the deliberations of the Founders, would indicate that citizenship should in any way be a factor to be considered in either procedure.
    The court is required to base decisions on Constitutional arguments. The court, once again, failed. The court had one job to do and it failed. Is it legal to ask citizenship? Yes or no?

    It will be very enlightening to Americans, I mean real Americans, when we discover we have 50-60 million non-citizens in the country. That is why people on your team fight it so hard.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    Sergeant Gleed (06-27-2019)

  15. #10
    Points: 74,117, Level: 66
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 1,333
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Standing Wolf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    314891
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    25,513
    Points
    74,117
    Level
    66
    Thanks Given
    5,696
    Thanked 21,008x in 12,234 Posts
    Mentioned
    414 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    The court is required to base decisions on Constitutional arguments. The court, once again, failed. The court had one job to do and it failed. Is it legal to ask citizenship? Yes or no?

    It will be very enlightening to Americans, I mean real Americans, when we discover we have 50-60 million non-citizens in the country. That is why people on your team fight it so hard.
    You are, of course, free to comment on anything you choose, but if you want people to take you seriously when you bring up or comment on legal matters, it would behoove you to first obtain some legal education.
    "The first thing you want to do after being shot is make sure you are not shot again." - Ace Atkins

    "Only a rank degenerate would drive 1,500 miles across Texas and not eat a chicken fried steak."
    - Larry McMurtry



+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts