The temp hiatus was a denier fiction. A slight slowdown in the rate of warming is natural variability, not a "hiatus".
So, the usual. It destroyed your position, and you couldn't address it, so you went into troll mode.
It's not debatable that Curry predicted flat temperatures for the decade after 2013. It's on her blog.
http://archive.is/hvQNK
---
Implications for the future: II. View emphasizing natural internal variability
The ‘hiatus’ will continue at least another decade
---
It's also not debatable that 2014, 2015 and 2016 set successive new warm temperature records.
It's not debatable that Curry quit academia while trash-talking all other scientists, even though they never trash-talked her. Your OP demonstrates that.
The only thing debatable is whether she's being bribed to be a shill. That's just a reasonable conclusion, based on the evidence. She stinks at forecasting, none of what she offers is any different from what NOAA offers for free, yet supposedly people (all of them unnamed) now pay her for forecasting. The reasonable conclusion is that her "forecasting" company is a front for taking bribe money.