User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 20 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 194

Thread: Schiff Lied and Everyone Knows this fact. Even the liberals here

  1. #21
    Points: 41,437, Level: 49
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 413
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Lummy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    6307
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    12,618
    Points
    41,437
    Level
    49
    Thanks Given
    4,948
    Thanked 6,307x in 4,359 Posts
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahuyaman View Post
    I think they know he lied. They just think his lying is the right thing to do in the current political climate.
    Now that's a disturbing thought. I wonder what is their "end game"?

  2. #22
    Points: 432,155, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307977
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    183,457
    Points
    432,155
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,178
    Thanked 76,992x in 55,613 Posts
    Mentioned
    700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lummy View Post
    Now that's a disturbing thought. I wonder what is their "end game"?
    Gaining power. Duh.

  3. #23
    Points: 75,691, Level: 67
    Level completed: 11%, Points required for next Level: 2,059
    Overall activity: 79.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first Group50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Calendar Award
    TheLiquidGuy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2041
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    19,941
    Points
    75,691
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    2,588
    Thanked 2,031x in 1,735 Posts
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)



    Right wing media has once again unfairly exaggerated in order to smear Schiff.

    Schiff never said he had proof of collusion
    Schiff never said he had direct evidence of collusion.

    Here is the actual text of the interview in question:

    Chuck: [...] All you have right now is a circumstantial case?

    Schiff: Actually no Chuck. I can tell you that the case is more than that. And I can’t go into the particulars. But there is more than circumstantial evidence now, so again I think Director Clapper--

    Chuck: You have seen direct evidence of collusion?

    Schiff: I don’t want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is very much worthy of investigation. So that is what we ought to do […]”


    Schiff never says he has “direct evidence” or “proof” of collusion.” He does say two interesting things though:

    1. “There is more than circumstantial evidence…” Evidence of what??? Chuck cuts him off so we never find out. He might have had evidence that there was communications or information exchanged. For example, Manafort providing polling data.
    2. “...there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is [...] worthy of investigation…” Once again, evidence of what??? He doesn’t specify, Schiff says it is worthy of investigation. If he had direct evidence of collusion, he would have said it was worthy of indictment or impeachment, not investigation. "Investigation" is a clear declaration of comparative weakness.


    “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
    rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
    --Donald Trump

    Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.



  4. #24
    Points: 264,399, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 82.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307877
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,547
    Points
    264,399
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,662
    Thanked 39,251x in 27,872 Posts
    Mentioned
    385 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLiquidGuy View Post



    Right wing media has once again unfairly exaggerated in order to smear Schiff.

    Schiff never said he had proof of collusion
    Schiff never said he had direct evidence of collusion.

    Here is the actual text of the interview in question:

    Chuck: [...] All you have right now is a circumstantial case?

    Schiff: Actually no Chuck. I can tell you that the case is more than that. And I can’t go into the particulars. But there is more than circumstantial evidence now, so again I think Director Clapper--

    Chuck: You have seen direct evidence of collusion?

    Schiff: I don’t want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is very much worthy of investigation. So that is what we ought to do […]”


    Schiff never says he has “direct evidence” or “proof” of collusion.” He does say two interesting things though:
    1. “There is more than circumstantial evidence…” Evidence of what??? Chuck cuts him off so we never find out. He might have had evidence that there was communications or information exchanged. For example, Manafort providing polling data.
    2. “...there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is [...] worthy of investigation…” Once again, evidence of what??? He doesn’t specify, Schiff says it is worthy of investigation. If he had direct evidence of collusion, he would have said it was worthy of indictment or impeachment, not investigation. "Investigation" is a clear declaration of comparative weakness.
    Schiff is a liar. He is your liar.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  5. #25
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Schiff is a liar. He is your liar.
    Liquids said

    Schiff never said he had direct evidence of collusion.


    Chuck: You have seen direct evidence of collusion?

    Schiff: I don’t want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is very much worthy of investigation. So that is what we ought to do […]” .....snip~


    The Usual from Liquids, huh?
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (05-07-2021)

  7. #26

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 473,342, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 59.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    200777
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    52,936
    Points
    473,342
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,067
    Thanked 46,047x in 24,878 Posts
    Mentioned
    887 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLiquidGuy View Post

    Right wing media has once again unfairly exaggerated in order to smear Schiff.

    Schiff never said he had proof of collusion
    Schiff never said he had direct evidence of collusion.

    Here is the actual text of the interview in question:

    Chuck: [...] All you have right now is a circumstantial case?

    Schiff: Actually no Chuck. I can tell you that the case is more than that. And I can’t go into the particulars. But there is more than circumstantial evidence now, so again I think Director Clapper--

    Chuck: You have seen direct evidence of collusion?

    Schiff: I don’t want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is very much worthy of investigation. So that is what we ought to do […]”


    Schiff never says he has “direct evidence” or “proof” of collusion.” He does say two interesting things though:
    1. “There is more than circumstantial evidence…” Evidence of what??? Chuck cuts him off so we never find out. He might have had evidence that there was communications or information exchanged. For example, Manafort providing polling data.
    2. “...there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is [...] worthy of investigation…” Once again, evidence of what??? He doesn’t specify, Schiff says it is worthy of investigation. If he had direct evidence of collusion, he would have said it was worthy of indictment or impeachment, not investigation. "Investigation" is a clear declaration of comparative weakness.
    No. I have seen him in other interviews making direct statements. He lied. He pushed a lie. All the while testifying to Mueller that he'd never seen any evidence of collusion. As did that political woman that went on TV (I forget her name) I think it was a red head (not Mr. Maddow). Directly lied - all while testifying to Mueller that they'd seen NADA. Why? To hurt Trump and further divide the country to gain power.
    Last edited by DGUtley; 05-07-2021 at 11:48 AM.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (05-07-2021),MMC (05-07-2021)

  9. #27
    Points: 432,155, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307977
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    183,457
    Points
    432,155
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,178
    Thanked 76,992x in 55,613 Posts
    Mentioned
    700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLiquidGuy View Post



    Right wing media has once again unfairly exaggerated in order to smear Schiff.

    Schiff never said he had proof of collusion
    Schiff never said he had direct evidence of collusion.

    Here is the actual text of the interview in question:

    Chuck: [...] All you have right now is a circumstantial case?

    Schiff: Actually no Chuck. I can tell you that the case is more than that. And I can’t go into the particulars. But there is more than circumstantial evidence now, so again I think Director Clapper--

    Chuck: You have seen direct evidence of collusion?

    Schiff: I don’t want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is very much worthy of investigation. So that is what we ought to do […]”


    Schiff never says he has “direct evidence” or “proof” of collusion.” He does say two interesting things though:
    1. “There is more than circumstantial evidence…” Evidence of what??? Chuck cuts him off so we never find out. He might have had evidence that there was communications or information exchanged. For example, Manafort providing polling data.
    2. “...there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is [...] worthy of investigation…” Once again, evidence of what??? He doesn’t specify, Schiff says it is worthy of investigation. If he had direct evidence of collusion, he would have said it was worthy of indictment or impeachment, not investigation. "Investigation" is a clear declaration of comparative weakness.
    He lied. He got caught. It nearly ruined your life and you can't get over it.
    When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.“ - Benjamin Franklin.


    “When people get used to preferential treatment equal treatment seems like discrimination.” - Thomas Sowell

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    MMC (05-07-2021)

  11. #28
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahuyaman View Post
    He lied. He got caught. It nearly ruined your life and you can't get over it.
    Yep.....reality is Schiff Lied! Liquids tried to give cover for him and failed!
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  12. #29
    Points: 75,691, Level: 67
    Level completed: 11%, Points required for next Level: 2,059
    Overall activity: 79.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first Group50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Calendar Award
    TheLiquidGuy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2041
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    19,941
    Points
    75,691
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    2,588
    Thanked 2,031x in 1,735 Posts
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    No. I have seen him in other interviews making direct statements. He lied. He pushed a lie. All the while testifying to Mueller that he'd never seen any evidence of collusion. As did that political woman that went on TV (I forget her name) I think it was a red head (not Mr. Maddow). Directly lied - all while testifying to Mueller that they'd seen NADA. Why? To hurt Trump and further divide the country to gain power.
    Show me such other interviews or else they do not exist.


    “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
    rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
    --Donald Trump

    Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.



  13. #30
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here ya go DG use any of the links you want to.



    Asam schiff lied about Trump and russian collusion - Bing


    WSJ Editorial Board or any others.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts