What other police depts? What confuses you about the majority across the nation?
Do I need to put up the video of Thomas Sowell so you can comprehend why there is no systemic racism? Yes that is what the majority is and then you can show a few exceptions to the norm. That is what is called a few disparities.
Again my stats back that criminal behavior identified to groups isn't racism. Also my stat from the Dept of Justice states blacks are not racially profiled and their study bears that out. Done every 3 years all over the country. Then there is the Leftist Fryer and his study.
“On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account.”
Then there is the National Crime Victim Survey that supports there is no Systemic Racism by Cops against Blacks. Their study supports the DOJ study. Then the National Academy of Sciences that the researchers found that the more frequently officers encounter violent suspects from any given racial group, the greater the chance that a member of that group will be fatally shot by a police officer.
There is ‘no significant evidence of antiblack disparity in the likelihood of being fatally shot by police,’ they concluded.
Yes more whites are killed than blacks or Hispanics. That's despite the fact that more crimes are committed by Blacks. Oh and yes that would include the stat on unarmed groups.
No I am not trying to ascertain that cops don't profile black people by referencing just a survey. I am doing so with 4 or 5 studies. Surveys. Reports. Or whatever terminology you use.
Oh because you used that more blacks are stopped while driving. The Motorists study?
The Racial Profiling Myth Debunked.....
The anti–racial profiling juggernaut has finally met its nemesis: the truth. According to a new study, black drivers on the New Jersey Turnpike are twice as likely to speed as white drivers, and are even more dominant among drivers breaking 90 miles per hour. This finding demolishes the myth of racial profiling. Precisely for that reason, the Bush Justice Department tried to bury the report so the profiling juggernaut could continue its destructive campaign against law enforcement. What happens next will show whether the politics of racial victimization now trump all other national concerns.
Until now, the anti-police crusade that travels under the banner of “ending racial profiling” has traded on ignorance. Its spokesmen went around the country charging that the police were stopping “too many” minorities for traffic infractions or more serious violations. The reason, explained the anti-cop crowd, was that the police were racist.
They can argue that no more. The new turnpike study solves one of the most vexing problems in racial profiling analysis:
establishing a violator benchmark. To show that the police are stopping “too many” members of a group, you need to know, at a minimum, the rate of lawbreaking among that group—the so-called violator benchmark. Only if the rate of stops or arrests greatly exceeds the rate of criminal behavior should our suspicions be raised.
But most of the studies that the ACLU and defense attorneys have proffered to show biased behavior by the police only used crude population measures as the benchmark for comparing police activity—arguing, say, that if 24 percent of speeding stops on a particular stretch of highway were of black drivers, in a city or state where blacks make up 19 percent of the population, the police are over-stopping blacks.
Such an analysis is clearly specious, since it fails to say what percentage of
speeders are black, but the data required to rebut it were not available.
Such investigations violate the reigning fiction in anti–racial profiling rhetoric: that all groups commit crime and other infractions at equal rates. It follows from this central fiction that any differences in the rate at which the police interact with certain citizens result only from police bias, not from differences in citizen behavior.
Despite the glaring flaws in every racial profiling study heretofore available, the press and the politicians jumped on the anti-profiling bandwagon. How could they lose? They showed their racial sensitivity, and, as for defaming the police without evidence, well, you don’t have to worry that the
New York Times will be on your case if you do.
No institution made more destructive use of racial profiling junk science than the Clinton Justice Department. Armed with the shoddy studies, it slapped costly consent decrees on police departments across the country, requiring them to monitor their officers’ every interaction with minorities, among other managerial intrusions.
But one thing did not change after the much-publicized consent decree: the proportion of blacks stopped on the turnpike for speeding continued to exceed their proportion in the driving population.
Man, those troopers must be either really dumb or really racist! thought most observers, including the New Jersey attorney general, who accused the troopers of persistent profiling.
Black drivers speed twice as much as white drivers, and speed at reckless levels even more. Blacks are actually stopped less than their speeding behavior would predict—they are 23 percent of those stopped.
The devastation wrought by this study to the anti-police agenda is catastrophic. It turns out that the police stop blacks more for speeding because they speed more. Race has nothing to do with it.
The elegant study, designed by the Public Service Research Institute in Maryland, had taken photos with high-speed camera equipment and a radar gun of nearly 40,000 drivers on the turnpike. The researchers then showed the photos to a team of three evaluators, who identified the race of the driver. The evaluators had no idea if the drivers in the photos had been speeding. The photos were then correlated with speeds.
Matthew Zingraff’s pioneering traffic research in North Carolina, due out in April, as well as sound studies in Pennsylvania, New York, and Miami. Expect many of the results to support the turnpike data, since circumstantial evidence from traffic fatalities and drunk-driving tests have long suggested different driving behaviors among different racial groups. While racist cops undoubtedly do exist, and undoubtedly they are responsible for isolated instances of racial profiling,
the evidence shows that systematic racial profiling by police does not exist.....snip~
https://www.city-journal.org/html/ra...ked-12244.html
No the Democratic governed and controlled cities, along with their activists implemented change. Reforms to mitigate racism in their police depts.
What did Ted Miller conclude. As follows.
“What this study says is that it doesn’t matter what your race is when you’re in a stop and frisk situation or arrest situation with a police officer. Your chance of being injured or killed is the same regardless of race – it’s equally dangerous for everyone,” Miller said.
Miller said that his findings were consistent with simulation studies that have found “police are no more likely to fire on unarmed blacks than unarmed whites”, citing a 2007 study from the University of Colorado. Researchers there found that, while the general public is more likely to erroneously shoot an unarmed black person in a computer simulation, police officers in the same game did not make the same errors. “Officers showed greater sensitivity,” that study reads, and “this tended to be particularly true with Black targets”. The same study found that both police and the general public were susceptible to anti-black bias in their reaction time.
A third study,
also released this month, from the Center for Policing Equity (PE), a criminal justice thinktank, reached a conclusion similar to Fryer’s. Its data suggests that in most use-of-force situations, black Americans were “more likely than Whites to be targeted for force”, including the drawing and pointing of weapons, use of pepper spray, Tasers and hands. But when it came to lethal force, the mean use of force rate was nearly double for whites versus blacks. The PE data was pulled from Bureau of Justice Statistics numbers for eight locales, and calculated use of force compared against arrests......snip~
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...counters-study